Minolta Finance Limited
Minolta Finance Limited (MINOLTAF.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MINOLTAF.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINOLTAF.BO | ₹1.27 | +0.00% | 121M | -2.16 | -₹0.56 | N/A |
| BAJAJFINSV.NS | ₹2,043.30 | +0.00% | 3.3T | 34.21 | ₹59.90 | +0.05% |
| BAJAJFINSV.BO | ₹2,046.05 | +0.00% | 3.3T | 34.22 | ₹59.89 | +0.05% |
| ABCAPITAL.BO | ₹349.30 | +0.00% | 924.9B | 26.64 | ₹13.26 | N/A |
| ABCAPITAL.NS | ₹349.30 | +0.00% | 924.5B | 26.63 | ₹13.26 | N/A |
| AIIL.BO | ₹497.05 | +0.00% | 418.7B | 11.52 | ₹42.80 | +0.30% |
| PEL.BO | ₹1,124.60 | +0.25% | 254.9B | 44.24 | ₹25.42 | +0.98% |
| INDIGRID-IV.NS | ₹164.49 | +0.00% | 156.9B | N/A | N/A | +9.77% |
| INDIGRID.NS | ₹164.49 | +15.06% | 118.7B | 42.20 | ₹3.37 | +8.51% |
| ELCIDIN.BO | ₹109,580.00 | +0.00% | 21.8B | 16.75 | ₹6,506.69 | +0.02% |
Stock Comparison
MINOLTAF.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.NS has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while BAJAJFINSV.NS trades at ₹2,043.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas BAJAJFINSV.NS's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.BO has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while BAJAJFINSV.BO trades at ₹2,046.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas BAJAJFINSV.BO's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ABCAPITAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.BO has a market cap of 924.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ABCAPITAL.BO trades at ₹349.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ABCAPITAL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ABCAPITAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ABCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 924.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ABCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹349.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ABCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ABCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs AIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, AIIL.BO has a market cap of 418.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while AIIL.BO trades at ₹497.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AIIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to AIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check AIIL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs PEL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, PEL.BO has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while PEL.BO trades at ₹1,124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas PEL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to PEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check PEL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs INDIGRID-IV.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, INDIGRID-IV.NS has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while INDIGRID-IV.NS trades at ₹164.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INDIGRID-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check INDIGRID-IV.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs INDIGRID.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, INDIGRID.NS has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while INDIGRID.NS trades at ₹164.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INDIGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to INDIGRID.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check INDIGRID.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ELCIDIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ELCIDIN.BO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ELCIDIN.BO trades at ₹109,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ELCIDIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ELCIDIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ELCIDIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ELCIDIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ZSARACOM.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ZSARACOM.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ZSARACOM.BO trades at ₹10,950.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ZSARACOM.BO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ZSARACOM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ZSARACOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ZSARACOM.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CENTRUM.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CENTRUM.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CENTRUM.BO trades at ₹24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CENTRUM.BO's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CENTRUM.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to CENTRUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CENTRUM.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CENTRUM.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CENTRUM.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CENTRUM.NS trades at ₹24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CENTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CENTRUM.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to CENTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CENTRUM.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CREST.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CREST.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CREST.NS trades at ₹335.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CREST.NS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CREST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to CREST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CREST.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CREST.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CREST.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CREST.BO trades at ₹331.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CREST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CREST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to CREST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CREST.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs RELCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, RELCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while RELCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas RELCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RELCAPITAL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to RELCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check RELCAPITAL.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs IVC.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, IVC.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while IVC.BO trades at ₹7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas IVC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to IVC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to IVC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check IVC.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs IVC.NS Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, IVC.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while IVC.NS trades at ₹7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas IVC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to IVC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to IVC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check IVC.NS's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs YASTF.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, YASTF.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while YASTF.BO trades at ₹157.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas YASTF.BO's P/E ratio is 194.44. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to YASTF.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to YASTF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check YASTF.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ABVL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ABVL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ABVL.BO trades at ₹7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ABVL.BO's P/E ratio is -83.44. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ABVL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ABVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ABVL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs INTELLCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, INTELLCAP.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while INTELLCAP.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INTELLCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 1097.56. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to INTELLCAP.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to INTELLCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check INTELLCAP.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GLOBUSCON.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GLOBUSCON.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GLOBUSCON.BO trades at ₹13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GLOBUSCON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GLOBUSCON.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to GLOBUSCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GLOBUSCON.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ZMILGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ZMILGFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ZMILGFIN.BO trades at ₹57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ZMILGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ZMILGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to ZMILGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ZMILGFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs RSDFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, RSDFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while RSDFIN.BO trades at ₹91.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas RSDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RSDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to RSDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check RSDFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs AGVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, AGVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while AGVENTURES.BO trades at ₹114.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AGVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AGVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to AGVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check AGVENTURES.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs FERVENTSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, FERVENTSYN.BO has a market cap of 981.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while FERVENTSYN.BO trades at ₹18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas FERVENTSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FERVENTSYN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to FERVENTSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check FERVENTSYN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs APOORVA.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, APOORVA.BO has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while APOORVA.BO trades at ₹36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas APOORVA.BO's P/E ratio is -360.80. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to APOORVA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to APOORVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check APOORVA.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs YAMNINV.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, YAMNINV.BO has a market cap of 671.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while YAMNINV.BO trades at ₹0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas YAMNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to YAMNINV.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to YAMNINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check YAMNINV.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs REGIS.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, REGIS.BO has a market cap of 660.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while REGIS.BO trades at ₹2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas REGIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to REGIS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to REGIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check REGIS.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MORGAN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MORGAN.BO has a market cap of 603.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MORGAN.BO trades at ₹58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MORGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MORGAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MORGAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MORGAN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs TOYAMSL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, TOYAMSL.BO has a market cap of 537.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while TOYAMSL.BO trades at ₹0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas TOYAMSL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to TOYAMSL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to TOYAMSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check TOYAMSL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs NCLRESE.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, NCLRESE.BO has a market cap of 460.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while NCLRESE.BO trades at ₹0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas NCLRESE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to NCLRESE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to NCLRESE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check NCLRESE.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs LERTHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, LERTHAI.BO has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while LERTHAI.BO trades at ₹579.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas LERTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is -157.30. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LERTHAI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to LERTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check LERTHAI.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MIL.BO has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MIL.BO trades at ₹33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MIL.BO's P/E ratio is 3347.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MIL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs KKFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, KKFIN.BO has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while KKFIN.BO trades at ₹58.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas KKFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KKFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to KKFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check KKFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs OASISEC.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, OASISEC.BO has a market cap of 307.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while OASISEC.BO trades at ₹17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas OASISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OASISEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to OASISEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check OASISEC.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs KARTKIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, KARTKIN.BO has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while KARTKIN.BO trades at ₹1,256.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas KARTKIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KARTKIN.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to KARTKIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check KARTKIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MONOT.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MONOT.BO has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MONOT.BO trades at ₹0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MONOT.BO's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MONOT.BO's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MONOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MONOT.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs QGO.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, QGO.BO has a market cap of 287.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while QGO.BO trades at ₹43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas QGO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to QGO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to QGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check QGO.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs JOHNPHARMA.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, JOHNPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while JOHNPHARMA.BO trades at ₹0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas JOHNPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check JOHNPHARMA.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MARGOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MARGOFIN.BO has a market cap of 280.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MARGOFIN.BO trades at ₹60.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MARGOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 180.62. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MARGOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MARGOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MARGOFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs TCFCFINQ.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, TCFCFINQ.BO has a market cap of 272.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while TCFCFINQ.BO trades at ₹27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas TCFCFINQ.BO's P/E ratio is 123.62. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to TCFCFINQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to TCFCFINQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check TCFCFINQ.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MORARKFI.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MORARKFI.BO has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MORARKFI.BO trades at ₹58.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MORARKFI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MORARKFI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MORARKFI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MORARKFI.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs INDCEMCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, INDCEMCAP.BO has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while INDCEMCAP.BO trades at ₹12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INDCEMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 155.50. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to INDCEMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to INDCEMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check INDCEMCAP.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs EASUN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, EASUN.BO has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while EASUN.BO trades at ₹49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas EASUN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.93. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to EASUN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to EASUN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check EASUN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs STRLGUA.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, STRLGUA.BO has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while STRLGUA.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas STRLGUA.BO's P/E ratio is -136.84. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to STRLGUA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to STRLGUA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check STRLGUA.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs BOMTALKIES.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, BOMTALKIES.BO has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while BOMTALKIES.BO trades at ₹4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas BOMTALKIES.BO's P/E ratio is -114.50. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BOMTALKIES.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to BOMTALKIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check BOMTALKIES.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs HRMNYCP.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, HRMNYCP.BO has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while HRMNYCP.BO trades at ₹80.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas HRMNYCP.BO's P/E ratio is -66.55. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HRMNYCP.BO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to HRMNYCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check HRMNYCP.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs SWRNASE.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, SWRNASE.BO has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while SWRNASE.BO trades at ₹81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SWRNASE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SWRNASE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to SWRNASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check SWRNASE.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs INVIGO.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, INVIGO.BO has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while INVIGO.BO trades at ₹5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INVIGO.BO's P/E ratio is -91.67. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to INVIGO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to INVIGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check INVIGO.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs SOUTLAT.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, SOUTLAT.BO has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while SOUTLAT.BO trades at ₹31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SOUTLAT.BO's P/E ratio is 87.03. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SOUTLAT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to SOUTLAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check SOUTLAT.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GLOBALCA.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GLOBALCA.BO has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GLOBALCA.BO trades at ₹0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GLOBALCA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GLOBALCA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to GLOBALCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GLOBALCA.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs PRESSURS.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, PRESSURS.BO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while PRESSURS.BO trades at ₹1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas PRESSURS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PRESSURS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to PRESSURS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check PRESSURS.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CHITRTX.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CHITRTX.BO has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CHITRTX.BO trades at ₹119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CHITRTX.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CHITRTX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to CHITRTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CHITRTX.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GSLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GSLSEC.BO has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GSLSEC.BO trades at ₹53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GSLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -54.70. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GSLSEC.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to GSLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GSLSEC.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs SHYMINV.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, SHYMINV.BO has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while SHYMINV.BO trades at ₹13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SHYMINV.BO's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SHYMINV.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to SHYMINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check SHYMINV.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs PRISMMEDI.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, PRISMMEDI.BO has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while PRISMMEDI.BO trades at ₹24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas PRISMMEDI.BO's P/E ratio is -373.14. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PRISMMEDI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to PRISMMEDI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check PRISMMEDI.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs DFL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, DFL.BO has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while DFL.BO trades at ₹44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas DFL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to DFL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to DFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check DFL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs CITL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, CITL.BO has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while CITL.BO trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CITL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CITL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to CITL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check CITL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GARBIFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GARBIFIN.BO has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GARBIFIN.BO trades at ₹12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GARBIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GARBIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to GARBIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GARBIFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs TOKYOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, TOKYOFIN.BO has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while TOKYOFIN.BO trades at ₹20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas TOKYOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 345.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to TOKYOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check TOKYOFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs ECSTSTL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, ECSTSTL.BO has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while ECSTSTL.BO trades at ₹17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ECSTSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ECSTSTL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to ECSTSTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check ECSTSTL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MFSINTRCRP.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MFSINTRCRP.BO has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MFSINTRCRP.BO trades at ₹18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MFSINTRCRP.BO's P/E ratio is -41.15. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MFSINTRCRP.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GALADAFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GALADAFIN.BO has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GALADAFIN.BO trades at ₹27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GALADAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GALADAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to GALADAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GALADAFIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs JAYBHCR.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, JAYBHCR.BO has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while JAYBHCR.BO trades at ₹15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas JAYBHCR.BO's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JAYBHCR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to JAYBHCR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check JAYBHCR.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs AGARWAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, AGARWAL.BO has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while AGARWAL.BO trades at ₹22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AGARWAL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AGARWAL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to AGARWAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check AGARWAL.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MLINDLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MLINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MLINDLTD.BO trades at ₹10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MLINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MLINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to MLINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MLINDLTD.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs GANHOLD.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, GANHOLD.BO has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while GANHOLD.BO trades at ₹64.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GANHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is -24.46. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GANHOLD.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to GANHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check GANHOLD.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs AMERISE.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, AMERISE.BO has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while AMERISE.BO trades at ₹0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AMERISE.BO's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AMERISE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to AMERISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check AMERISE.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs MAHANIN.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, MAHANIN.BO has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while MAHANIN.BO trades at ₹9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas MAHANIN.BO's P/E ratio is -106.56. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to MAHANIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to MAHANIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check MAHANIN.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs KUBERJI.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, KUBERJI.BO has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while KUBERJI.BO trades at ₹12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas KUBERJI.BO's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KUBERJI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is less volatile compared to KUBERJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check KUBERJI.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs BEEYU.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, BEEYU.BO has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while BEEYU.BO trades at ₹2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas BEEYU.BO's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BEEYU.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to BEEYU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check BEEYU.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs SHYAM.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, SHYAM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while SHYAM.BO trades at ₹8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SHYAM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SHYAM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check SHYAM.BO's competition here
MINOLTAF.BO vs SHYAMAINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
MINOLTAF.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MINOLTAF.BO stands at 121M. In comparison, SHYAMAINFO.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MINOLTAF.BO is priced at ₹1.27, while SHYAMAINFO.BO trades at ₹7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MINOLTAF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SHYAMAINFO.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MINOLTAF.BO's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MINOLTAF.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MINOLTAF.BO.Check SHYAMAINFO.BO's competition here