Montague International Holding Ltd.
Montague International Holding Ltd. (MIHL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MIHL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIHL | $0.00 | +0.00% | 75.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ASAZY | $16.77 | +0.06% | 37.9B | 24.36 | $0.69 | +1.68% |
| ASAZF | $33.72 | +0.00% | 37.5B | 24.61 | $1.37 | +1.64% |
| SOMLF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 20.34 | $1.77 | +1.84% |
| SCTBF | $15.15 | -1.30% | 8.3B | 15.30 | $0.99 | +2.66% |
| SCTBY | $14.59 | +0.00% | 8B | 14.74 | $0.99 | +2.74% |
| SOMLY | $9.04 | -0.11% | 7.6B | 20.57 | $0.44 | +1.01% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 16.00 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.81 | -0.68% | 456.2M | 83.00 | $0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MIHL vs ASAZY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check ASAZY's competition here
MIHL vs ASAZF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check ASAZF's competition here
MIHL vs SOMLF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check SOMLF's competition here
MIHL vs SCTBF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and SCTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTBF's competition here
MIHL vs SCTBY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check SCTBY's competition here
MIHL vs SOMLY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check SOMLY's competition here
MIHL vs LOIMF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOIMF's competition here
MIHL vs SOHGF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check SOHGF's competition here
MIHL vs MRLWF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check MRLWF's competition here
MIHL vs CRFQF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check CRFQF's competition here
MIHL vs ICTSF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check ICTSF's competition here
MIHL vs GKPRF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -94.60. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check GKPRF's competition here
MIHL vs RSKIA Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check RSKIA's competition here
MIHL vs WPNNF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check WPNNF's competition here
MIHL vs SECUF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -176.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SECUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check SECUF's competition here
MIHL vs PRBCF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check PRBCF's competition here
MIHL vs CSTI Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check CSTI's competition here
MIHL vs LDDFF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check LDDFF's competition here
MIHL vs VOTDF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check VOTDF's competition here
MIHL vs DADTF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DADTF's competition here
MIHL vs PLRTF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check PLRTF's competition here
MIHL vs IWAL Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check IWAL's competition here
MIHL vs DTII Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check DTII's competition here
MIHL vs DIGTF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check DIGTF's competition here
MIHL vs PTEFF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check PTEFF's competition here
MIHL vs SSECF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSECF's competition here
MIHL vs MACE Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check MACE's competition here
MIHL vs ARGL Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARGL's competition here
MIHL vs DRNG Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 783.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check DRNG's competition here
MIHL vs WCCP Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 719.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check WCCP's competition here
MIHL vs VCON Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check VCON's competition here
MIHL vs ATWT Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and ATWT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATWT's competition here
MIHL vs LGTT Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check LGTT's competition here
MIHL vs BLPG Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 368K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check BLPG's competition here
MIHL vs VSYS Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check VSYS's competition here
MIHL vs PSGI Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGI's competition here
MIHL vs SCTY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTY's competition here
MIHL vs GDSI Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDSI's competition here
MIHL vs HCGS Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check HCGS's competition here
MIHL vs MGNT Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check MGNT's competition here
MIHL vs ABPR Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABPR's competition here
MIHL vs WOAM Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check WOAM's competition here
MIHL vs PERL Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERL's competition here
MIHL vs ALXXF Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check ALXXF's competition here
MIHL vs EKCS Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check EKCS's competition here
MIHL vs EBWK Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check EBWK's competition here
MIHL vs SKVY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and SKVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKVY's competition here
MIHL vs HWSY Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check HWSY's competition here
MIHL vs CVAS Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check CVAS's competition here
MIHL vs DIRV Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIRV's competition here
MIHL vs GTKP Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check GTKP's competition here
MIHL vs HLCN Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and HLCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLCN's competition here
MIHL vs PWLK Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIHL.Check PWLK's competition here
MIHL vs VSYM Comparison July 2025
MIHL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIHL stands at 75.6K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIHL is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIHL's ROE is +2.22%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIHL and VSYM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYM's competition here