Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ABBNY trades at $57.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ABLZF trades at $58.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while MIELY trades at $40.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LGRDY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LGRVF trades at $123.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while PRYMF trades at $67.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while PRYMY trades at $33.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FELTF trades at $44.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FELTY trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while PHPPY trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while YASKF trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while NEXNY trades at $57.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while NXPRF trades at $115.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FUWAY trades at $22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while SFFYF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while YASKY trades at $42.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 956M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while HMDPF trades at $80.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -29.28. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while VARGF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while COSXF trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while XPPLF trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CPWHF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CRPHY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while NVNXF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while TGEN trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while PCELF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while AFGYF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FCELB trades at $327.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1063.31. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while VARTY trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ILIKF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while DIALF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GELNF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while EXROF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while NHHHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while QBAK trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while IHGP trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LPSIF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ORBT trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while DFEL trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ASTO trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while HYEG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GPGC trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CECBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LPENF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while IDGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while OZSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while TOGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CAPC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while KRFG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 580.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while BSTK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while SGLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while PSTO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while USLG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while EIPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while AIPG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while DLYT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while CHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while FDEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while LSCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GNAL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GCHT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while USGA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while DCFCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while GCLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while HLXW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while TMGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.

MIELF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MIELF stands at 43.7B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, MIELF is priced at $21.08, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MIELF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.52, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIELF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MIELF is more volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIELF.