Millicom International Cellular S.A.
Millicom International Cellular S.A. (MICCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MICCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICCF | $18.45 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 70.96 | $0.26 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $36.92 | -0.46% | 180.9B | 12.35 | $2.99 | +2.73% |
| DTEGY | $36.73 | -0.08% | 180.2B | 12.30 | $2.99 | +2.70% |
| SFTBF | $103.93 | +5.04% | 148.1B | 19.68 | $5.28 | +0.29% |
| SFTBY | $51.83 | +4.73% | 148B | 19.68 | $2.64 | +0.18% |
| NTTYY | $27.65 | +0.30% | 92.5B | 13.79 | $2.02 | +2.26% |
| NPPXF | $0.96 | -12.73% | 81.6B | 12.33 | $0.08 | +3.27% |
| SFBQF | $1.62 | -2.41% | 77.4B | 23.21 | $0.07 | +19.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KDDIY | $18.19 | +1.51% | 72.9B | 15.83 | $1.15 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
MICCF vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while DTEGF trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check DTEGF's competition here
MICCF vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while DTEGY trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check DTEGY's competition here
MICCF vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SFTBF trades at $103.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SFTBF's competition here
MICCF vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SFTBY trades at $51.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SFTBY's competition here
MICCF vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while NTTYY trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check NTTYY's competition here
MICCF vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while NPPXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check NPPXF's competition here
MICCF vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SFBQF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SFBQF's competition here
MICCF vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check AMXVF's competition here
MICCF vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while KDDIY trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check KDDIY's competition here
MICCF vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while KDDIF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check KDDIF's competition here
MICCF vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
MICCF vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SGAPY trades at $32.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SGAPY's competition here
MICCF vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
MICCF vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CLLNY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check CLLNY's competition here
MICCF vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while FNCTF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
MICCF vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SWZCF trades at $740.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
MICCF vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SCMWY trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SCMWY's competition here
MICCF vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLGPY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TLGPY's competition here
MICCF vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TTRAF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TTRAF's competition here
MICCF vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TEFOF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
MICCF vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while VODPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODPF's competition here
MICCF vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BTGOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTGOF's competition here
MICCF vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CHWRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
MICCF vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AVIFY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIFY's competition here
MICCF vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TELNY trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TELNY's competition here
MICCF vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TELNF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TELNF's competition here
MICCF vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check CTOWY's competition here
MICCF vs KKPNY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while KKPNY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check KKPNY's competition here
MICCF vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while RCIAF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
MICCF vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while KKPNF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check KKPNF's competition here
MICCF vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check AVIVF's competition here
MICCF vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check ELMUY's competition here
MICCF vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check AVIKF's competition here
MICCF vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TLKMF's competition here
MICCF vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while MTNOF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
MICCF vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while VDMCY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check VDMCY's competition here
MICCF vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while MTNOY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check MTNOY's competition here
MICCF vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while HLTOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check HLTOY's competition here
MICCF vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLSNY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TLSNY's competition here
MICCF vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
MICCF vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
MICCF vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TIAIY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TIAIY's competition here
MICCF vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BCEPF trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check BCEPF's competition here
MICCF vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BECEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check BECEF's competition here
MICCF vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TIAJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TIAJF's competition here
MICCF vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TCPFF's competition here
MICCF vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLTZY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TLTZY's competition here
MICCF vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLTZF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
MICCF vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check HKTTF's competition here
MICCF vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TIAOF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TIAOF's competition here
MICCF vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check VODAF's competition here
MICCF vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AAFRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check AAFRF's competition here
MICCF vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while HKTTY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
MICCF vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCPPF's competition here
MICCF vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
MICCF vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check LBRDB's competition here
MICCF vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
MICCF vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check ELMUF's competition here
MICCF vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TELDF's competition here
MICCF vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SOBKY trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SOBKY's competition here
MICCF vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SHNUF's competition here
MICCF vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TELDY's competition here
MICCF vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check AARTY's competition here
MICCF vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while FRTAY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check FRTAY's competition here
MICCF vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while QBCRF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
MICCF vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check MYTEF's competition here
MICCF vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while QBCAF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
MICCF vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check HLTOF's competition here
MICCF vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
MICCF vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
MICCF vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PCCWY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -134.80. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check PCCWY's competition here
MICCF vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -68.13. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check PCWLF's competition here
MICCF vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
MICCF vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BZQIY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check BZQIY's competition here
MICCF vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check PTITF's competition here
MICCF vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TRKNY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
MICCF vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
MICCF vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check UDIRF's competition here
MICCF vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
MICCF vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check PHTCF's competition here
MICCF vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CUCSY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check CUCSY's competition here
MICCF vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check FRTAF's competition here
MICCF vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CUCSF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and CUCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSF's competition here
MICCF vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
MICCF vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
MICCF vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while IIJIF trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
MICCF vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while IIJIY trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
MICCF vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check BGAOF's competition here
MICCF vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PTXKY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and PTXKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTXKY's competition here
MICCF vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
MICCF vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check TRKNF's competition here
MICCF vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while BGAOY trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
MICCF vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while SPKKY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check SPKKY's competition here
MICCF vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
MICCF vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check PTTWF's competition here
MICCF vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check GMOYF's competition here
MICCF vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
MICCF vs CHRYY Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CHRYY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -452.17. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check CHRYY's competition here
MICCF vs CHRUF Comparison August 2025
MICCF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICCF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICCF is priced at $18.45, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICCF currently has a P/E ratio of 70.96, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, MICCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICCF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICCF.Check CHRUF's competition here