Maiden Holdings, Ltd.
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. (MH-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MH-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Reinsurance Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH-PA | $5.93 | -0.50% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RE | $351.28 | +2.93% | 15.3B | 20.75 | $16.93 | +1.88% |
| RGA | $205.96 | +2.86% | 13.4B | 11.54 | $17.68 | +1.81% |
| EG | $325.51 | +0.67% | 13.2B | 8.65 | $37.80 | +2.45% |
| RNR | $297.19 | +0.54% | 12.9B | 5.30 | $56.04 | +0.54% |
| RZB | $25.00 | +0.00% | 12.6B | 4.09 | $6.09 | +5.75% |
| BNRE | $47.12 | -0.80% | 6.9B | 4.90 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| BNRE-A | $50.01 | +1.38% | 6.9B | 5.20 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| RNR-PF | $20.98 | +0.48% | 6.5B | -5.32 | -$3.90 | +0.54% |
| HG | $30.02 | +2.77% | 3B | 5.38 | $5.55 | +6.73% |
Stock Comparison
MH-PA vs RE Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RE trades at $351.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RE's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RE's competition here
MH-PA vs RGA Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RGA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RGA trades at $205.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGA's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RGA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RGA's competition here
MH-PA vs EG Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while EG trades at $325.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EG's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to EG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check EG's competition here
MH-PA vs RNR Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RNR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RNR trades at $297.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RNR's competition here
MH-PA vs RZB Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RZB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RZB's competition here
MH-PA vs BNRE Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, BNRE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while BNRE trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRE's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BNRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to BNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check BNRE's competition here
MH-PA vs BNRE-A Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, BNRE-A has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while BNRE-A trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRE-A's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BNRE-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to BNRE-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check BNRE-A's competition here
MH-PA vs RNR-PF Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RNR-PF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RNR-PF trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNR-PF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RNR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RNR-PF's competition here
MH-PA vs HG Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, HG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while HG trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HG's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to HG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check HG's competition here
MH-PA vs SPNT Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SPNT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while SPNT trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNT's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPNT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to SPNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check SPNT's competition here
MH-PA vs EACQU Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EACQU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while EACQU trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EACQU's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to EACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check EACQU's competition here
MH-PA vs EACQ Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, EACQ has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while EACQ trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EACQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to EACQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check EACQ's competition here
MH-PA vs SPNT-PB Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, SPNT-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while SPNT-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNT-PB's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPNT-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to SPNT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check SPNT-PB's competition here
MH-PA vs BAMR Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, BAMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while BAMR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMR's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BAMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to BAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check BAMR's competition here
MH-PA vs RNR-PG Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RNR-PG has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RNR-PG trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PG's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNR-PG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RNR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RNR-PG's competition here
MH-PA vs GLRE Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, GLRE has a market cap of 589.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while GLRE trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GLRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to GLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check GLRE's competition here
MH-PA vs MHLD Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, MHLD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while MHLD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MHLD's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is less volatile compared to MHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check MHLD's competition here
MH-PA vs KG Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, KG has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while KG trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KG's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is less volatile compared to KG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check KG's competition here
MH-PA vs PRE-PJ Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, PRE-PJ has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while PRE-PJ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRE-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PRE-PJ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to PRE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check PRE-PJ's competition here
MH-PA vs OXBR Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, OXBR has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while OXBR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXBR's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OXBR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is less volatile compared to OXBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check OXBR's competition here
MH-PA vs OXBRW Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, OXBRW has a market cap of 826K. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while OXBRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXBRW's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OXBRW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to OXBRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check OXBRW's competition here
MH-PA vs MH-PC Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, MH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while MH-PC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MH-PC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is less volatile compared to MH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check MH-PC's competition here
MH-PA vs RZA Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RZA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RZA's competition here
MH-PA vs MH-PD Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, MH-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while MH-PD trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MH-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MH-PD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to MH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check MH-PD's competition here
MH-PA vs RNR-PE Comparison April 2026
MH-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MH-PA stands at 0. In comparison, RNR-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MH-PA is priced at $5.93, while RNR-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNR-PE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, MH-PA's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RNR-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MH-PA is more volatile compared to RNR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MH-PA.Check RNR-PE's competition here