Megaport Limited
Megaport Limited (MGPPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MGPPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGPPF | $7.01 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 233.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,856.00 | +3.98% | 58.5B | 53.97 | $34.39 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.33 | +1.61% | 57.7B | 52.31 | $0.35 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $65.00 | +0.00% | 49B | 15.78 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.11% |
| TOITF | $139.16 | +3.13% | 11.6B | 100.84 | $1.38 | N/A |
| TMICY | $64.26 | +0.56% | 8.7B | 39.69 | $1.65 | +1.45% |
| TMICF | $65.49 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 38.98 | $1.68 | +3.57% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.76% |
| NEXXY | $6.06 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 37.88 | $0.16 | +4.67% |
Stock Comparison
MGPPF vs ADYYF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ADYYF trades at $1,856.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 53.97. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ADYYF's competition here
MGPPF vs ADYEY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ADYEY trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 52.31. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ADYEY's competition here
MGPPF vs BSQKZ Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while BSQKZ trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check BSQKZ's competition here
MGPPF vs KAKZF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check KAKZF's competition here
MGPPF vs TOITF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TOITF trades at $139.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 100.84. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TOITF's competition here
MGPPF vs TMICY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TMICY trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TMICY's competition here
MGPPF vs TMICF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TMICF trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TMICF's competition here
MGPPF vs NEXPF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NEXPF's competition here
MGPPF vs NEXXY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NEXXY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NEXXY's competition here
MGPPF vs DRKTY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DRKTY's competition here
MGPPF vs GMYTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check GMYTF's competition here
MGPPF vs SWDAF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SWDAF's competition here
MGPPF vs STWRY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check STWRY's competition here
MGPPF vs CIOXY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CIOXY's competition here
MGPPF vs EXNWF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check EXNWF's competition here
MGPPF vs OVHFF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while OVHFF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 144.67. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check OVHFF's competition here
MGPPF vs DRKTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DRKTF's competition here
MGPPF vs SPNUF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SPNUF's competition here
MGPPF vs WWLNF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while WWLNF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check WWLNF's competition here
MGPPF vs WRDLY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while WRDLY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check WRDLY's competition here
MGPPF vs SANP Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SANP's competition here
MGPPF vs PHPYF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PHPYF's competition here
MGPPF vs YHEKF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 896.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while YHEKF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check YHEKF's competition here
MGPPF vs CPLFF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CPLFF's competition here
MGPPF vs FMZNF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 681.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FMZNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FMZNF's competition here
MGPPF vs FNCHF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FNCHF's competition here
MGPPF vs PRTHU Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PRTHU's competition here
MGPPF vs PYPTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 553.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PYPTF's competition here
MGPPF vs DYNDF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DYNDF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DYNDF's competition here
MGPPF vs TDCSF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TDCSF's competition here
MGPPF vs SPMYY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SPMYY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SPMYY's competition here
MGPPF vs NFONF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NFONF's competition here
MGPPF vs CORZQ Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CORZQ's competition here
MGPPF vs TYPMF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TYPMF's competition here
MGPPF vs FFPP Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FFPP's competition here
MGPPF vs OTPMF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check OTPMF's competition here
MGPPF vs ABANF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ABANF's competition here
MGPPF vs SERKF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SERKF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SERKF's competition here
MGPPF vs SEEMF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 205.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SEEMF's competition here
MGPPF vs HISNF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while HISNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check HISNF's competition here
MGPPF vs FSOYF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FSOYF's competition here
MGPPF vs ERDLF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ERDLF's competition here
MGPPF vs GIVXF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check GIVXF's competition here
MGPPF vs CGAAY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CGAAY's competition here
MGPPF vs PYFRF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PYFRF's competition here
MGPPF vs FCLOF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FCLOF's competition here
MGPPF vs HAIVF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while HAIVF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check HAIVF's competition here
MGPPF vs BGOPF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while BGOPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check BGOPF's competition here
MGPPF vs DGGXF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DGGXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DGGXF's competition here
MGPPF vs VRSSF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while VRSSF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check VRSSF's competition here
MGPPF vs CROTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CROTF's competition here
MGPPF vs JGHG Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check JGHG's competition here
MGPPF vs WHEN Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check WHEN's competition here
MGPPF vs QBITF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check QBITF's competition here
MGPPF vs NTTCF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NTTCF's competition here
MGPPF vs NOWVF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NOWVF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NOWVF's competition here
MGPPF vs APGT Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check APGT's competition here
MGPPF vs CORZR Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CORZR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CORZR's competition here
MGPPF vs ISDCF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ISDCF's competition here
MGPPF vs SKKY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SKKY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SKKY's competition here
MGPPF vs SDCH Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SDCH trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SDCH's competition here
MGPPF vs TFLM Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TFLM's competition here
MGPPF vs POTTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check POTTF's competition here
MGPPF vs CLOQ Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CLOQ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CLOQ's competition here
MGPPF vs FOBIF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FOBIF's competition here
MGPPF vs PLCKF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PLCKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PLCKF's competition here
MGPPF vs CLPMF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CLPMF's competition here
MGPPF vs CYBNY Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check CYBNY's competition here
MGPPF vs QFEEF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check QFEEF's competition here
MGPPF vs EPXGF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check EPXGF's competition here
MGPPF vs DRKOF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DRKOF's competition here
MGPPF vs ATCHW Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ATCHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ATCHW's competition here
MGPPF vs DLTXF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DLTXF's competition here
MGPPF vs DSAIF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DSAIF's competition here
MGPPF vs IPNFF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check IPNFF's competition here
MGPPF vs SFIIF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SFIIF's competition here
MGPPF vs NBVAF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while NBVAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check NBVAF's competition here
MGPPF vs DVPNF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check DVPNF's competition here
MGPPF vs RKNEF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while RKNEF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check RKNEF's competition here
MGPPF vs VENZF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check VENZF's competition here
MGPPF vs OVTZ Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check OVTZ's competition here
MGPPF vs PKKFF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PKKFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PKKFF's competition here
MGPPF vs PKLBF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check PKLBF's competition here
MGPPF vs TGCB Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TGCB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TGCB's competition here
MGPPF vs MODGF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check MODGF's competition here
MGPPF vs RIHT Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check RIHT's competition here
MGPPF vs SCYRF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SCYRF's competition here
MGPPF vs MBLMF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check MBLMF's competition here
MGPPF vs VISM Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check VISM's competition here
MGPPF vs KCRD Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while KCRD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check KCRD's competition here
MGPPF vs TONR Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check TONR's competition here
MGPPF vs RCWDF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check RCWDF's competition here
MGPPF vs FUAPF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 819.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FUAPF's competition here
MGPPF vs INOTF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check INOTF's competition here
MGPPF vs INAR Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check INAR's competition here
MGPPF vs MKTDF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 728.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while MKTDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +220.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check MKTDF's competition here
MGPPF vs ITNF Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check ITNF's competition here
MGPPF vs FSRDQ Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check FSRDQ's competition here
MGPPF vs SMKG Comparison July 2025
MGPPF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MGPPF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MGPPF is priced at $7.01, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MGPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 233.67, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGPPF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MGPPF is more volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGPPF.Check SMKG's competition here