Morgan Sindall Group plc

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0KSR.L has a market cap of 48.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0KSR.L trades at $329.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0KSR.L's P/E ratio is 100.22. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0KSR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0KSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, LTOD.L has a market cap of 30.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while LTOD.L trades at $22.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas LTOD.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTOD.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to LTOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0DH7.L has a market cap of 16.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0DH7.L trades at $155.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0DH7.L's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0DH7.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0DH7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0OFP.IL has a market cap of 16.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0OFP.IL trades at $177.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0OFP.IL's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0OFP.IL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0OFP.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0H9N.L has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0H9N.L trades at $104.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0H9N.L's P/E ratio is 71.74. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0H9N.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0H9N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0MKP.L has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0MKP.L trades at $82.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0MKP.L's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0MKP.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0MKP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0IQC.L has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0IQC.L trades at $36.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0IQC.L's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0IQC.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0IQC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, BAB.L has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while BAB.L trades at $860.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas BAB.L's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAB.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to BAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, BBY.L has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while BBY.L trades at $486.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas BBY.L's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBY.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to BBY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, HILS.L has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while HILS.L trades at $1,830.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas HILS.L's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HILS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to HILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0QO2.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0QO2.L trades at $131.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0QO2.L's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0QO2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0QO2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0M6I.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0M6I.L trades at $49.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0M6I.L's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0M6I.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0M6I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0R8F.L has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0R8F.L trades at $50.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0R8F.L's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0R8F.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0R8F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0R53.L has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0R53.L trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0R53.L's P/E ratio is 496.25. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0R53.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0R53.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, KLR.L has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while KLR.L trades at $1,522.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KLR.L's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KLR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to KLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, KIE.L has a market cap of 691.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while KIE.L trades at $162.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KIE.L's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KIE.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to KIE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, RNWH.L has a market cap of 630.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while RNWH.L trades at $797.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas RNWH.L's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNWH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to RNWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0OA7.L has a market cap of 583.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0OA7.L trades at $40.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0OA7.L's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0OA7.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0OA7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0QNT.L has a market cap of 436.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0QNT.L trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0QNT.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0QNT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0QNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, GFRD.L has a market cap of 403.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while GFRD.L trades at $413.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas GFRD.L's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GFRD.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to GFRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, COST.L has a market cap of 324.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while COST.L trades at $119.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas COST.L's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to COST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, SUR.L has a market cap of 212.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while SUR.L trades at $124.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SUR.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to SUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, SFR.L has a market cap of 92.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while SFR.L trades at $31.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SFR.L's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to SFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, CTO.L has a market cap of 88.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while CTO.L trades at $159.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas CTO.L's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTO.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to CTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0F7F.L has a market cap of 60.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0F7F.L trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0F7F.L's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0F7F.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0F7F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0QIH.L has a market cap of 56.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0QIH.L trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0QIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0QIH.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0QIH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, BILN.L has a market cap of 48.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while BILN.L trades at $382.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas BILN.L's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to BILN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, SMJ.L has a market cap of 46.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while SMJ.L trades at $120.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SMJ.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMJ.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to SMJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, VANL.L has a market cap of 41.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while VANL.L trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas VANL.L's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VANL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to VANL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, HERC.L has a market cap of 39.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while HERC.L trades at $49.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas HERC.L's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HERC.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to HERC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, KINO.L has a market cap of 36.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while KINO.L trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KINO.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KINO.L's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to KINO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, NEXS.L has a market cap of 14.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while NEXS.L trades at $162.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas NEXS.L's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEXS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to NEXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, TGP.L has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while TGP.L trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas TGP.L's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TGP.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to TGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, AUK.L has a market cap of 5.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while AUK.L trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas AUK.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUK.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to AUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, RAI.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while RAI.L trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas RAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAI.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to RAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, FCRM.L has a market cap of 718764.00. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while FCRM.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas FCRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCRM.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MGNS.L has daily volatility of 4.43 and FCRM.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, CLLN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while CLLN.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas CLLN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLLN.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MGNS.L has daily volatility of 4.43 and CLLN.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, 0DMQ.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while 0DMQ.L trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas 0DMQ.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0DMQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to 0DMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, NMCN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while NMCN.L trades at $117.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas NMCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NMCN.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is less volatile compared to NMCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, TPG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while TPG.L trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas TPG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TPG.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MGNS.L has daily volatility of 4.43 and TPG.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MGNS.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MGNS.L stands at 1.72B. In comparison, JLG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MGNS.L is priced at $3,685.00, while JLG.L trades at $402.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MGNS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas JLG.L's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MGNS.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JLG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MGNS.L is more volatile compared to JLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MGNS.L.