Mobivity Holdings Corp.
Mobivity Holdings Corp. MFON Peers
See (MFON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFON | $0.35 | +15.33% | 23.9M | -2.36 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $307.80 | +0.83% | 361B | 53.91 | $5.74 | +1.63% |
| CNSWF | $3,646.19 | -0.57% | 77.2B | 103.62 | $35.14 | +0.14% |
| DASTY | $37.19 | +1.75% | 48.9B | 36.12 | $1.03 | +1.47% |
| INVUP | $26.00 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1733.33 | -$0.02 | +15.63% |
| DASTF | $36.04 | -1.77% | 47.3B | 34.65 | $1.04 | +1.54% |
| WTCHF | $75.39 | +6.03% | 25B | 125.65 | $0.60 | +0.14% |
| WIGBY | $73.49 | +0.12% | 24.4B | 122.48 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| DIDIY | $4.95 | -0.40% | 23B | 61.75 | $0.08 | N/A |
| NEMTF | $151.63 | +21.29% | 17.5B | 85.19 | $1.78 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
MFON vs SAPGF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 361B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SAPGF trades at $307.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 53.91. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs CNSWF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while CNSWF trades at $3,646.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 103.62. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DASTY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DASTY trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs INVUP Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while INVUP trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1733.33. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DASTF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DASTF trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs WTCHF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while WTCHF trades at $75.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 125.65. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs WIGBY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while WIGBY trades at $73.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 122.48. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DIDIY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DIDIY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NEMTF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NEMTF trades at $151.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 85.19. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NEMKY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 83.28. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs XROLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while XROLF trades at $110.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 127.33. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SGGEF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SGGEF trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs OBIIF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while OBIIF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SGPYY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SGPYY trades at $67.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs OCLCF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while OCLCF trades at $123.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NCSYF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NCSYF trades at $167.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs KGDEY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while KGDEY trades at $196.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -344.13. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ALMFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs HOILF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs FNOXF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMSNY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMSNY trades at $72.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMNSF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs THNOF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs LIFX Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while LIFX trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 525.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SRBEF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SRBEF trades at $292.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -103.06. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ASOZF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SMCYY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs KXSCF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while KXSCF trades at $146.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 443.61. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SICRF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ASOZY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMVWF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs UBMRF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMVWY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMVWY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs KHOTF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs QTGPF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while QTGPF trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ESKEF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs IPEU Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SWONF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SWONF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -975.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs WEMXF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMOAY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMOAY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -58.60. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BCTCF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs MAGTF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs FREKF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while FREKF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs KNNNF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while KNNNF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs VOBIF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ZEUCF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs LTTHF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs EGHSF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 965.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while EGHSF trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs GBGPF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 955M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ESIGF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BHPA Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BTRCF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SLVFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TTMZF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 656.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TMOAF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NPACY Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 631.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NPACY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs XMMRF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NPACF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs PXPHF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NXLLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 529.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NXLLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 160.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs RWWI Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while RWWI trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NSWEF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BRDLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs CMDXF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 450.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while CMDXF trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BLKLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 441.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BLKLF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -74.86. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TCYSF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 436.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TCYSF trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 133.86. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BVSFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs IQGLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs CHNVF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs RPGHF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs PSSWF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs LCHTF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs RTME Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs PLDIF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while PLDIF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ELMFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs ABXXF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 320M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while ABXXF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs JAPPF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs RLLMF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DOTDF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DOTDF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs IVUFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs CIGMF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs KWIK Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, KWIK has a market cap of 272.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while KWIK trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas KWIK's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KWIK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to KWIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs EXMXF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs LOQPF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs BAINF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while BAINF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs MCAP Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while MCAP trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SMTEF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SMTEF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DAHLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs FXSRF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs FBSFF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs GBUX Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while GBUX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs WONDF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs NEOJF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs EXSPF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while EXSPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs SYZLF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while SYZLF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -165.25. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs CBSZF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs TCIIF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs IARGF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.
MFON vs DFORF Comparison
MFON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFON stands at 23.9M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFON is priced at $0.35, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.36, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, MFON's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MFON is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFON.