International Iconic Gold Exploration Corp.
International Iconic Gold Exploration Corp. MFMLF Peers
See (MFMLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFMLF | $0.01 | -1.87% | 1.1M | -1.05 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.50 | -1.19% | 69B | 13.16 | $0.19 | +2.12% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +11.73% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $13.86 | -3.35% | 19.8B | 26.14 | $0.53 | +1.52% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.42% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $53.60 | -0.45% | 12.9B | 24.14 | $2.22 | +2.91% |
| CAHPF | $5.49 | -0.18% | 10.9B | 23.87 | $0.23 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
MFMLF vs ZIJMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ZIJMF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs OPYGY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs GFIOF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs NESRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while NESRF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs NSTYY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs NCMGY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs NCMGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs LUGDF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while LUGDF trades at $53.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs CAHPF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CAHPF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and CAHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs HGMCF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs AURQF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while AURQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs AULGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs EDVMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while EDVMF trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.90. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ZHAOF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ZHAOF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and ZHAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs SBYSF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SBYSF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and SBYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs ARGTF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ARGTF trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -271.59. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs DGMLF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while DGMLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and DGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs GSISF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while GSISF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs OCANF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OCANF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ZIJMY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ZIJMY trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs PMNXF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while PMNXF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs GRLGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs TORXF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while TORXF trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs KNTNF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while KNTNF trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RGRNF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RGRNF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -347.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs DPMLF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while DPMLF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs CRNLF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CRNLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs CELTF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs WDOFF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while WDOFF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RMLRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs ORAAF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ORAAF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs REDLF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and REDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs ELKMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ELKMF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs WFRSF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while WFRSF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs CXBMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs HCHDF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while HCHDF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs EOGSF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while EOGSF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs PAFRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and PAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs OBNNF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MWSNF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MWSNF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -81.67. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MAUTF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MAUTF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs KOZAY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs LECBF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs DRDGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while DRDGF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and DRDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs HCHDY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs BELGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and BELGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs SVLKF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs RUPRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 922.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RUPRF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs SNWGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 897.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SNWGF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -39.86. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs SGSVF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs KRRGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RMGGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RMGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and RMGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs PDIYF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 714.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while PDIYF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -27.28. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs WTGRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RGDFF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ECRTF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 556.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ECRTF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs GUYGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 535.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while GUYGF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ASGOF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ASGOF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MNSAF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MNSAF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RMGGY Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RMGGY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and RMGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs NVMLF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ORZCF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 491M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ORZCF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ARNGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs OSKA Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 461.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OSKA trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RSRBF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 457.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RSRBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RMLFF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 412.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RMLFF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs PNGZF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PNGZF has a market cap of 411M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while PNGZF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PNGZF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PNGZF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to PNGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs RIOFF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while RIOFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 92.96. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs THXPF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 386.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while THXPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs LMGDF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs KSKGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and KSKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs PROBF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while PROBF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MNDJF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MNDJF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs TPRXF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ELEMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 314.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ELEMF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MAKOF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MAKOF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ALKEF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ALKEF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs URGYF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, URGYF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while URGYF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas URGYF's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to URGYF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and URGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs TGMGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while TGMGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to TGMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs OGNRF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OGNRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs FDMIF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while FDMIF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs MGDPF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs OMGGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OMGGF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -21.08. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs OSIIF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs ERRSF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs GDRZF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while GDRZF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs STPGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while STPGF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs STBMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs SRBIF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SRBIF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs JAGGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while JAGGF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs HSTXF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while HSTXF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs ATLDF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ATLDF has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while ATLDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ATLDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATLDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to ATLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs WRLGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while WRLGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs AGXKF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs SAAGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs CNLMF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs DCCNF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MFMLF vs THSGF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while THSGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.
MFMLF vs CNMXF Comparison
MFMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MFMLF stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MFMLF is priced at $0.01, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MFMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MFMLF's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MFMLF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MFMLF.