Mediterranean Towers Ltd.
Mediterranean Towers Ltd. (MDTWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MDTWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDTWF | $2.15 | +0.00% | 324.2M | 7.41 | $0.29 | +8.37% |
| VONOY | $16.00 | -0.50% | 26.7B | -30.19 | -$0.53 | +4.14% |
| VNNVF | $31.50 | +2.83% | 26.3B | -29.72 | -$1.06 | +4.51% |
| CLNXF | $35.84 | -3.14% | 25.3B | -447.94 | -$0.08 | +0.20% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 40.06 | $1.00 | +3.72% |
| SURDF | $38.69 | +0.00% | 18.2B | 13.97 | $2.77 | +1.23% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.00% | 16B | 12.14 | $1.40 | N/A |
| SWPFF | $2.69 | +19.56% | 15.5B | -134.50 | -$0.02 | +5.25% |
| IFSUF | $12.30 | -1.13% | 11.5B | 27.33 | $0.45 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
MDTWF vs VONOY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VONOY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check VONOY's competition here
MDTWF vs VNNVF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VNNVF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check VNNVF's competition here
MDTWF vs CLNXF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CLNXF trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -447.94. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and CLNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLNXF's competition here
MDTWF vs VTAGY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTAGY's competition here
MDTWF vs VTWRF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check VTWRF's competition here
MDTWF vs SURDF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SURDF trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SURDF's competition here
MDTWF vs SURYY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SURYY's competition here
MDTWF vs SWPFF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SWPFF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -134.50. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and SWPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWPFF's competition here
MDTWF vs IFSUF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while IFSUF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check IFSUF's competition here
MDTWF vs SWPRF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SWPRF's competition here
MDTWF vs CLILF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CLILF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check CLILF's competition here
MDTWF vs WRFRF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while WRFRF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check WRFRF's competition here
MDTWF vs AZRGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check AZRGF's competition here
MDTWF vs HULCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while HULCF trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and HULCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HULCF's competition here
MDTWF vs ESRCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and ESRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESRCF's competition here
MDTWF vs LEGIF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while LEGIF trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and LEGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LEGIF's competition here
MDTWF vs LGMMY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGMMY's competition here
MDTWF vs NXDCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while NXDCF trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -129.86. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check NXDCF's competition here
MDTWF vs SCOTF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SCOTF's competition here
MDTWF vs HLPPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while HLPPF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check HLPPF's competition here
MDTWF vs NMEHF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while NMEHF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMEHF's competition here
MDTWF vs HLPPY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while HLPPY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check HLPPY's competition here
MDTWF vs SSSAF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SSSAF trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SSSAF's competition here
MDTWF vs TAGYY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAGYY's competition here
MDTWF vs AANNF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while AANNF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check AANNF's competition here
MDTWF vs CWSRF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CWSRF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 85.85. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and CWSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWSRF's competition here
MDTWF vs TYTMF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TYTMF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check TYTMF's competition here
MDTWF vs IWGFF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while IWGFF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 150.75. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and IWGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IWGFF's competition here
MDTWF vs TAGOF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TAGOF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check TAGOF's competition here
MDTWF vs VGPBF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VGPBF trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check VGPBF's competition here
MDTWF vs CTRGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check CTRGF's competition here
MDTWF vs CGSHY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGSHY's competition here
MDTWF vs CNPPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check CNPPF's competition here
MDTWF vs FBGGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check FBGGF's competition here
MDTWF vs GRNNF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while GRNNF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check GRNNF's competition here
MDTWF vs ENTOF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ENTOF's competition here
MDTWF vs SRRLF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SRRLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and SRRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRRLF's competition here
MDTWF vs WIHLY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WIHLY's competition here
MDTWF vs GRGTF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while GRGTF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check GRGTF's competition here
MDTWF vs GRDDY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check GRDDY's competition here
MDTWF vs SVLPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SVLPF's competition here
MDTWF vs ASGTF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ASGTF trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 520.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and ASGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGTF's competition here
MDTWF vs DUSCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DUSCF's competition here
MDTWF vs HYSNF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check HYSNF's competition here
MDTWF vs EVGPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while EVGPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and EVGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVGPF's competition here
MDTWF vs FBGBY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBGBY's competition here
MDTWF vs MEQYF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MEQYF trades at $135.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MEQYF's competition here
MDTWF vs SVAUF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SVAUF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -57.17. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and SVAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVAUF's competition here
MDTWF vs ACNDF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ACNDF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ACNDF's competition here
MDTWF vs ICHIF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ICHIF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ICHIF's competition here
MDTWF vs VIBVY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIBVY's competition here
MDTWF vs HYSNY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 988.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while HYSNY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 385.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and HYSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYSNY's competition here
MDTWF vs GRMHF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check GRMHF's competition here
MDTWF vs RLHPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLHPF's competition here
MDTWF vs MMHTF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MMHTF's competition here
MDTWF vs PTLKF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check PTLKF's competition here
MDTWF vs SSHLY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 665.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SSHLY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SSHLY's competition here
MDTWF vs SSHLF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SSHLF's competition here
MDTWF vs GBCEY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBCEY's competition here
MDTWF vs KWLGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWLGF's competition here
MDTWF vs JPPSF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPPSF's competition here
MDTWF vs LSLPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while LSLPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check LSLPF's competition here
MDTWF vs DLMI Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while DLMI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check DLMI's competition here
MDTWF vs SHMSF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SHMSF's competition here
MDTWF vs MDPCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDPCF's competition here
MDTWF vs NTPIF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check NTPIF's competition here
MDTWF vs FXTGY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and FXTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXTGY's competition here
MDTWF vs SOHOF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SOHOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check SOHOF's competition here
MDTWF vs SDWHF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDWHF's competition here
MDTWF vs RNHEF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check RNHEF's competition here
MDTWF vs FCRIF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCRIF's competition here
MDTWF vs MRFGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRFGF's competition here
MDTWF vs MSGNF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MSGNF's competition here
MDTWF vs TPRP Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check TPRP's competition here
MDTWF vs BREUF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while BREUF trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check BREUF's competition here
MDTWF vs AZLCZ Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while AZLCZ trades at $1,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check AZLCZ's competition here
MDTWF vs PKTEF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while PKTEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check PKTEF's competition here
MDTWF vs OJOC Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check OJOC's competition here
MDTWF vs MHIVF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MHIVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MHIVF's competition here
MDTWF vs BVERS Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while BVERS trades at $3,050.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to BVERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check BVERS's competition here
MDTWF vs CRSS Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check CRSS's competition here
MDTWF vs CPTP Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while CPTP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check CPTP's competition here
MDTWF vs ADPPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ADPPF's competition here
MDTWF vs PCPDF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check PCPDF's competition here
MDTWF vs TNHDF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNHDF's competition here
MDTWF vs MDICF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDICF's competition here
MDTWF vs LGYSF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGYSF's competition here
MDTWF vs ABCP Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ABCP trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ABCP's competition here
MDTWF vs MNGGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MNGGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MNGGF's competition here
MDTWF vs ADHLF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ADHLF's competition here
MDTWF vs ASPZ Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ASPZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ASPZ's competition here
MDTWF vs DIVVZ Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIVVZ's competition here
MDTWF vs BCKMF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCKMF's competition here
MDTWF vs ATTGF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check ATTGF's competition here
MDTWF vs TRPTF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while TRPTF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and TRPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRPTF's competition here
MDTWF vs MGAG Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDTWF.Check MGAG's competition here
MDTWF vs PRPPF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRPPF's competition here
MDTWF vs MBHCF Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and MBHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBHCF's competition here
MDTWF vs ZDPY Comparison July 2025
MDTWF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDTWF stands at 324.2M. In comparison, ZDPY has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDTWF is priced at $2.15, while ZDPY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDTWF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ZDPY's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, MDTWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZDPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDTWF and ZDPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZDPY's competition here