Duro Felguera, S.A.
Duro Felguera, S.A. MDF.MC Peers
See (MDF.MC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDF.MC | €0.27 | +0.94% | 58M | -0.59 | -€0.46 | N/A |
| DG.PA | €125.85 | -1.60% | 70.9B | 14.93 | €8.43 | +3.77% |
| EN.PA | €38.39 | -1.03% | 14.5B | 13.81 | €2.78 | +5.21% |
| FGR.PA | €121.10 | -1.10% | 11.2B | 11.08 | €10.93 | +3.88% |
| SPIE.PA | €44.74 | +0.18% | 7.5B | 27.62 | €1.62 | +2.24% |
| ACKB.BR | €224.00 | -0.18% | 7.3B | 15.93 | €14.06 | +1.19% |
| ARCAD.AS | €45.48 | -0.39% | 4.1B | 16.84 | €2.70 | +2.20% |
| DEME.BR | €136.80 | -0.73% | 3.5B | 12.00 | €11.40 | +3.89% |
| BAMNB.AS | €7.37 | +2.36% | 1.9B | 32.02 | €0.23 | +3.39% |
| HEIJM.AS | €56.00 | +3.99% | 1.5B | 16.92 | €3.31 | +2.93% |
Stock Comparison
MDF.MC vs DG.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, DG.PA has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while DG.PA trades at €125.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas DG.PA's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DG.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to DG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs EN.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, EN.PA has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while EN.PA trades at €38.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas EN.PA's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EN.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to EN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs FGR.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, FGR.PA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while FGR.PA trades at €121.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas FGR.PA's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGR.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to FGR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs SPIE.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, SPIE.PA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while SPIE.PA trades at €44.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas SPIE.PA's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPIE.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to SPIE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs ACKB.BR Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, ACKB.BR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while ACKB.BR trades at €224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas ACKB.BR's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACKB.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ACKB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs ARCAD.AS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, ARCAD.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while ARCAD.AS trades at €45.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas ARCAD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARCAD.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ARCAD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs DEME.BR Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, DEME.BR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while DEME.BR trades at €136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas DEME.BR's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DEME.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to DEME.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs BAMNB.AS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, BAMNB.AS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while BAMNB.AS trades at €7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas BAMNB.AS's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BAMNB.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to BAMNB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs HEIJM.AS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, HEIJM.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while HEIJM.AS trades at €56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas HEIJM.AS's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HEIJM.AS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to HEIJM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs EGL.LS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, EGL.LS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while EGL.LS trades at €4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas EGL.LS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EGL.LS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to EGL.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs ASY.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, ASY.PA has a market cap of 600.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while ASY.PA trades at €41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas ASY.PA's P/E ratio is 76.85. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASY.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ASY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs MAR.LS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, MAR.LS has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while MAR.LS trades at €2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas MAR.LS's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAR.LS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to MAR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs CFEB.BR Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, CFEB.BR has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while CFEB.BR trades at €8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas CFEB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFEB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to CFEB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs MOUR.BR Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, MOUR.BR has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while MOUR.BR trades at €530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas MOUR.BR's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOUR.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MOUR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs TDSA.LS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, TDSA.LS has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while TDSA.LS trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas TDSA.LS's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TDSA.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to TDSA.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs INFE.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, INFE.PA has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while INFE.PA trades at €83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas INFE.PA's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INFE.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to INFE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs TVRB.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, TVRB.PA has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while TVRB.PA trades at €61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas TVRB.PA's P/E ratio is 83.11. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TVRB.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to TVRB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs CDU.LS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, CDU.LS has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while CDU.LS trades at €24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas CDU.LS's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDU.LS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to CDU.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs MLHYE.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, MLHYE.PA has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while MLHYE.PA trades at €120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas MLHYE.PA's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLHYE.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MLHYE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs SEC.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, SEC.PA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while SEC.PA trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas SEC.PA's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEC.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to SEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs GPA.LS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, GPA.LS has a market cap of 450K. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while GPA.LS trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas GPA.LS's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPA.LS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to GPA.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs MLAGI.PA Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, MLAGI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while MLAGI.PA trades at €0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas MLAGI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLAGI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MLAGI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs BOKA.AS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, BOKA.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while BOKA.AS trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas BOKA.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOKA.AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to BOKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.
MDF.MC vs ORANW.AS Comparison
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 58M. In comparison, ORANW.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.27, while ORANW.AS trades at €5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.59, whereas ORANW.AS's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ORANW.AS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ORANW.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.