Duro Felguera, S.A.
Duro Felguera, S.A. (MDF.MC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MDF.MC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDF.MC | €0.23 | -2.60% | 49.5M | -0.50 | -€0.46 | N/A |
| DG.PA | €121.40 | -1.14% | 69.3B | 14.86 | €8.32 | +3.84% |
| EN.PA | €36.92 | -1.18% | 14.4B | 13.66 | €2.77 | +5.28% |
| FGR.PA | €118.85 | -1.12% | 11.2B | 11.08 | €10.93 | +3.88% |
| SPIE.PA | €51.20 | -3.12% | 8.9B | 44.38 | €1.20 | +1.88% |
| ACKB.BR | €218.00 | -1.00% | 7.2B | 15.70 | €14.04 | +1.72% |
| ARCAD.AS | €41.30 | +0.54% | 3.7B | 15.70 | €2.65 | +2.40% |
| DEME.BR | €130.60 | -0.46% | 3.3B | 13.47 | €9.80 | +2.02% |
| BAMNB.AS | €7.52 | -2.97% | 2.1B | 35.11 | €0.23 | +3.10% |
| HEIJM.AS | €59.25 | -3.74% | 1.7B | 15.18 | €4.07 | +2.65% |
Stock Comparison
MDF.MC vs DG.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, DG.PA has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while DG.PA trades at €121.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DG.PA's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DG.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to DG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check DG.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs EN.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, EN.PA has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while EN.PA trades at €36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EN.PA's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EN.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to EN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check EN.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs FGR.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, FGR.PA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while FGR.PA trades at €118.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FGR.PA's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGR.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to FGR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check FGR.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs SPIE.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, SPIE.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while SPIE.PA trades at €51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SPIE.PA's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPIE.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to SPIE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check SPIE.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs ACKB.BR Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, ACKB.BR has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while ACKB.BR trades at €218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ACKB.BR's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACKB.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ACKB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check ACKB.BR's competition here
MDF.MC vs ARCAD.AS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, ARCAD.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while ARCAD.AS trades at €41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ARCAD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARCAD.AS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to ARCAD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check ARCAD.AS's competition here
MDF.MC vs DEME.BR Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, DEME.BR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while DEME.BR trades at €130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DEME.BR's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DEME.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to DEME.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check DEME.BR's competition here
MDF.MC vs BAMNB.AS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, BAMNB.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while BAMNB.AS trades at €7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BAMNB.AS's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BAMNB.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to BAMNB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check BAMNB.AS's competition here
MDF.MC vs HEIJM.AS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, HEIJM.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while HEIJM.AS trades at €59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HEIJM.AS's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HEIJM.AS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to HEIJM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check HEIJM.AS's competition here
MDF.MC vs EGL.LS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, EGL.LS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while EGL.LS trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EGL.LS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EGL.LS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to EGL.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check EGL.LS's competition here
MDF.MC vs ASY.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, ASY.PA has a market cap of 693.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while ASY.PA trades at €47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASY.PA's P/E ratio is 88.80. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASY.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to ASY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check ASY.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs CFEB.BR Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, CFEB.BR has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while CFEB.BR trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CFEB.BR's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFEB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to CFEB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check CFEB.BR's competition here
MDF.MC vs MOUR.BR Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, MOUR.BR has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while MOUR.BR trades at €584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MOUR.BR's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOUR.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MOUR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check MOUR.BR's competition here
MDF.MC vs MAR.LS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, MAR.LS has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while MAR.LS trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MAR.LS's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAR.LS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to MAR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check MAR.LS's competition here
MDF.MC vs TDSA.LS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, TDSA.LS has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while TDSA.LS trades at €0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TDSA.LS's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TDSA.LS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to TDSA.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check TDSA.LS's competition here
MDF.MC vs INFE.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, INFE.PA has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while INFE.PA trades at €71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas INFE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INFE.PA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to INFE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check INFE.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs TVRB.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, TVRB.PA has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while TVRB.PA trades at €54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TVRB.PA's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TVRB.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to TVRB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check TVRB.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs CDU.LS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, CDU.LS has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while CDU.LS trades at €12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CDU.LS's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDU.LS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to CDU.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check CDU.LS's competition here
MDF.MC vs MLHYE.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, MLHYE.PA has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while MLHYE.PA trades at €107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MLHYE.PA's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLHYE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MLHYE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check MLHYE.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs SEC.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, SEC.PA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while SEC.PA trades at €2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SEC.PA's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEC.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is less volatile compared to SEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check SEC.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs GPA.LS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, GPA.LS has a market cap of 262.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while GPA.LS trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPA.LS's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPA.LS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to GPA.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check GPA.LS's competition here
MDF.MC vs MLAGI.PA Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, MLAGI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while MLAGI.PA trades at €0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MLAGI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLAGI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to MLAGI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check MLAGI.PA's competition here
MDF.MC vs ORANW.AS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, ORANW.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while ORANW.AS trades at €5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ORANW.AS's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ORANW.AS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to ORANW.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check ORANW.AS's competition here
MDF.MC vs BOKA.AS Comparison August 2025
MDF.MC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDF.MC stands at 49.5M. In comparison, BOKA.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDF.MC is priced at €0.23, while BOKA.AS trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDF.MC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BOKA.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MDF.MC's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOKA.AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDF.MC is more volatile compared to BOKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDF.MC.Check BOKA.AS's competition here