Meridian Energy Limited
Meridian Energy Limited MDDNF Peers
See (MDDNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDDNF | $3.96 | N/A | 10.36B | 39.60 | $0.10 | +2.84% |
| FOJCY | $3.32 | +0.15% | 74.47B | 12.30 | $0.27 | +7.44% |
| OEZVY | $14.65 | -7.34% | 25.35B | 12.11 | $1.21 | +2.99% |
| OEZVF | $67.84 | -7.26% | 23.57B | 11.23 | $6.04 | +5.24% |
| CZAVF | $37.15 | +2.91% | 19.94B | 20.52 | $1.81 | +5.98% |
| CEZYY | $18.00 | -0.28% | 19.33B | 15.65 | $1.15 | N/A |
| DNNGY | $12.27 | +0.57% | 15.50B | 87.64 | $0.14 | N/A |
| DOGEF | $36.69 | -0.03% | 15.42B | 91.73 | $0.40 | N/A |
| FOJCF | $16.52 | +15.85% | 14.82B | 12.71 | $1.30 | +11.67% |
| KAEPY | $5.96 | +5.67% | 13.28B | 4.03 | $1.48 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
MDDNF vs FOJCY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 74.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while FOJCY trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs OEZVY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 25.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while OEZVY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to OEZVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs OEZVF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while OEZVF trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CZAVF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 19.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CZAVF trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CEZYY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and CEZYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs DNNGY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 15.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while DNNGY trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 87.64. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs DOGEF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 15.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while DOGEF trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 91.73. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and DOGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs FOJCF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while FOJCF trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs KAEPY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while KAEPY trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CLPXF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 13.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CLPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs KAEPF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 11.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while KAEPF trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs EDRVF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 10.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while EDRVF trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs BRENF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while BRENF trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -42.41. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs NOSPF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs IFUUF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while IFUUF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs MGHTF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TEPCF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TEPCF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and TEPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs TKECF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TKECF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKECF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TKECY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TKECY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKECY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs PUPOF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs AGQPF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and AGQPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs COENF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while COENF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs NPIFF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while NPIFF trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TEPCY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TEPCY trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and TEPCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs EDRWY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while EDRWY trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to EDRWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CPOIF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CPOIF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 459.09. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs DRXGY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while DRXGY trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to DRXGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs EPWDF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while EPWDF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CLPXY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CLPXY trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and CLPXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs DRXGF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while DRXGF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TREAY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TREAY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TREAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TRSWF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CGKEF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs BRLXF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while BRLXF trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is 267.50. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and BRLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs INGXF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while INGXF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 69.51. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and INGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs CGKEY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CGKEY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ALRCF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ALRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs TREAF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TREAF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and TREAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs STECF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while STECF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs FSGCY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while FSGCY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ENGDF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs SEYMF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs VLTAF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ERXCF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ERXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs CWPWF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 390.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and CWPWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs OKEPF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 361.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while OKEPF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs LGSXY Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 339.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while LGSXY trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ENLTF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ATRWF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ATRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs SMTLD Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs RAMPF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 176.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while RAMPF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs SVMRF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and SVMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs PHNGF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and PHNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs PVLTF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 81.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PVLTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs SMTLF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 79.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SMTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs IESVF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 72.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while IESVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and IESVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs WEGYF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 57.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while WEGYF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs SKPGF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and SKPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs AZREF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 48.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while AZREF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to AZREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs GIPIF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 45.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and GIPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs SHUNF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 41.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SHUNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CLMOF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs SMAYF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 21.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while SMAYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and SMAYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs CLNV Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 21.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CLNV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TDWRF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 20.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TDWRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs PHIXF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and PHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs RROYF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 14.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while RROYF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs WNDW Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 14.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while WNDW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs AZLOF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and AZLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs GEBRF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 12.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while GEBRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CWGYF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 12.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CWGYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs AWSL Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 11.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while AWSL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs MOTNF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs FNEC Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while FNEC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to FNEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs PWCO Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 3.20M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PWCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs VGREF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VGREF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and VGREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs VXIT Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VXIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs NKWFF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while NKWFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ASRE Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ASRE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASRE's ROE of -7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs PRHL Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PRHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and PRHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs TNSTF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 889194.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TNSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ALKHF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 791424.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs NEVE Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746772.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while NEVE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and NEVE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs IICN Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 719695.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while IICN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and IICN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs GSFI Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654176.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while GSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and GSFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs ENCVF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630720.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs MMMW Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 325149.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while MMMW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and MMMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs VSPC Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141051.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VSPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs CPWR Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 92185.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CPWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to CPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs PSPW Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 82289.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while PSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs GEECF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 47193.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while GEECF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs TPII Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37240.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while TPII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and TPII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs ETRXF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 33409.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ETRXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs ARSC Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22430.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ARSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ARSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs QSPW Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15558.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while QSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QSPW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDDNF.
MDDNF vs ZHYLF Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15328.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and ZHYLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs VENG Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12629.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VENG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and VENG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs VCII Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11388.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while VCII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and VCII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MDDNF vs CGEI Comparison
MDDNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDDNF stands at 10.36B. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9756.00. Regarding current trading prices, MDDNF is priced at $3.96, while CGEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDDNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.60, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MDDNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDDNF and CGEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).