Mind Cure Health Inc.
Mind Cure Health Inc. MCUR.CN Peers
See (MCUR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCUR.CN | CA$0.08 | N/A | 7M | -0.75 | -CA$0.10 | N/A |
| BLU.TO | CA$19.48 | -0.10% | 2.5B | -20.29 | -CA$0.96 | N/A |
| MMED.NE | CA$14.90 | +9.48% | 1.1B | -4.50 | -CA$3.31 | N/A |
| FRX.TO | CA$10.66 | +2.01% | 294.4M | -14.81 | -CA$0.72 | N/A |
| DRUG.CN | CA$38.73 | -0.26% | 274.3M | -193.65 | -CA$0.20 | N/A |
| CYBN.NE | CA$10.78 | +3.16% | 226.7M | -2.17 | -CA$4.96 | N/A |
| EPRX.TO | CA$5.84 | -1.35% | 209.4M | -5.62 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| MSCL.TO | CA$0.55 | N/A | 97M | 2.20 | CA$0.25 | N/A |
| ONC.TO | CA$1.02 | +14.61% | 90.6M | -2.49 | -CA$0.41 | N/A |
| MSET.CN | CA$0.74 | -1.33% | 75M | -12.33 | -CA$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MCUR.CN vs BLU.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BLU.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BLU.TO trades at CA$19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BLU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BLU.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to BLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs MMED.NE Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MMED.NE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MMED.NE trades at CA$14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MMED.NE's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MMED.NE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MMED.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs FRX.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, FRX.TO has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while FRX.TO trades at CA$10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FRX.TO's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to FRX.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to FRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs DRUG.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, DRUG.CN has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while DRUG.CN trades at CA$38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DRUG.CN's P/E ratio is -193.65. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to DRUG.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to DRUG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs CYBN.NE Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, CYBN.NE has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while CYBN.NE trades at CA$10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CYBN.NE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to CYBN.NE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to CYBN.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs EPRX.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, EPRX.TO has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while EPRX.TO trades at CA$5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas EPRX.TO's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to EPRX.TO's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to EPRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs MSCL.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MSCL.TO has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MSCL.TO trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MSCL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MSCL.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MSCL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs ONC.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, ONC.TO has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while ONC.TO trades at CA$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ONC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to ONC.TO's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to ONC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs MSET.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MSET.CN has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MSET.CN trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MSET.CN's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MSET.CN's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MCUR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and MSET.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
MCUR.CN vs HBP.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, HBP.TO has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while HBP.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HBP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to HBP.TO's ROE of +21.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and HBP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs ONCO.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, ONCO.CN has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while ONCO.CN trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ONCO.CN's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to ONCO.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and ONCO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs MDNA.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MDNA.TO has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MDNA.TO trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MDNA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MDNA.TO's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MDNA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs GLAB.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, GLAB.CN has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while GLAB.CN trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to GLAB.CN's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and GLAB.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs SVA.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, SVA.TO has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while SVA.TO trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SVA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to SVA.TO's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to SVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs PMN.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, PMN.TO has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while PMN.TO trades at CA$6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PMN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to PMN.TO's ROE of -5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to PMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs IGX.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, IGX.TO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while IGX.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IGX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to IGX.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to IGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs MBX.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MBX.TO has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MBX.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MBX.TO's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MBX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MBX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs DTC.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, DTC.CN has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while DTC.CN trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DTC.CN's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to DTC.CN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to DTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs DOSE.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, DOSE.CN has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while DOSE.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DOSE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to DOSE.CN's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to DOSE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs AEZS.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, AEZS.TO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AEZS.TO trades at CA$8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AEZS.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to AEZS.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to AEZS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs BCT.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BCT.TO has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BCT.TO trades at CA$4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BCT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BCT.TO's ROE of +66.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to BCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs TELI.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, TELI.CN has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while TELI.CN trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TELI.CN's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to TELI.CN's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to TELI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs PHRM.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, PHRM.CN has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while PHRM.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PHRM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to PHRM.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to PHRM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs PREV.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, PREV.CN has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while PREV.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PREV.CN's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to PREV.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and PREV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs REUN.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, REUN.TO has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while REUN.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas REUN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to REUN.TO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to REUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs BETR.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BETR.CN has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BETR.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BETR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BETR.CN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to BETR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs IMV.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, IMV.TO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while IMV.TO trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IMV.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to IMV.TO's ROE of -4.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to IMV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs RVX.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, RVX.TO has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while RVX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas RVX.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to RVX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and RVX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs TBP.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, TBP.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while TBP.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TBP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to TBP.TO's ROE of -4.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and TBP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs MDMA.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MDMA.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MDMA.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MDMA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MDMA.CN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MDMA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs BLAB.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BLAB.CN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BLAB.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BLAB.CN's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and BLAB.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs BIOV.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BIOV.CN has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BIOV.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BIOV.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BIOV.CN's ROE of +4.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and BIOV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs GLOW.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, GLOW.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while GLOW.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GLOW.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to GLOW.CN's ROE of +12.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and GLOW.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs COOL.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, COOL.CN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while COOL.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas COOL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to COOL.CN's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and COOL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs TRYP.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, TRYP.CN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while TRYP.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TRYP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to TRYP.CN's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and TRYP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs ASEP.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, ASEP.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while ASEP.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ASEP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to ASEP.CN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and ASEP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs CMND.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, CMND.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while CMND.CN trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CMND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to CMND.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and CMND.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs GTTX.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, GTTX.CN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while GTTX.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GTTX.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to GTTX.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and GTTX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs AWKN.NE Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, AWKN.NE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AWKN.NE trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AWKN.NE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to AWKN.NE's ROE of -4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and AWKN.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs MYND.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MYND.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MYND.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MYND.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MYND.CN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MYND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs APS.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, APS.TO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while APS.TO trades at CA$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas APS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to APS.TO's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to APS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs MOOD.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, MOOD.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MOOD.CN trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MOOD.CN's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to MOOD.CN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to MOOD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs IPCI.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, IPCI.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while IPCI.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IPCI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to IPCI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to IPCI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs AGN.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, AGN.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AGN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AGN.CN's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to AGN.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and AGN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs APLI.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, APLI.TO has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while APLI.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas APLI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to APLI.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to APLI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs ENBI.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, ENBI.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while ENBI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ENBI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to ENBI.CN's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to ENBI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs BRAX.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, BRAX.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BRAX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BRAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to BRAX.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and BRAX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs HAVN.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, HAVN.CN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while HAVN.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HAVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to HAVN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and HAVN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs LEXT.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, LEXT.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while LEXT.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas LEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to LEXT.CN's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to LEXT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs CHGX.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, CHGX.CN has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while CHGX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CHGX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to CHGX.CN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and CHGX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs CURE.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, CURE.CN has a market cap of 408K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while CURE.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CURE.CN's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to CURE.CN's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and CURE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs ABRT.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, ABRT.CN has a market cap of 372.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while ABRT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ABRT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to ABRT.CN's ROE of +16.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and ABRT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs NSHS.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, NSHS.CN has a market cap of 359.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while NSHS.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NSHS.CN's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to NSHS.CN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to NSHS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs WBIO.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, WBIO.CN has a market cap of 324.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while WBIO.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WBIO.CN's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to WBIO.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and WBIO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs NIRV.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, NIRV.CN has a market cap of 289.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while NIRV.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NIRV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to NIRV.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and NIRV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs NOVA.CN Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, NOVA.CN has a market cap of 148.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while NOVA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NOVA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to NOVA.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN and NOVA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MCUR.CN vs IN.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, IN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while IN.TO trades at CA$4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IN.TO's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to IN.TO's ROE of -162.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to IN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.
MCUR.CN vs TRIL.TO Comparison
MCUR.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCUR.CN stands at 7M. In comparison, TRIL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCUR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while TRIL.TO trades at CA$23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCUR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TRIL.TO's P/E ratio is -34.06. In terms of profitability, MCUR.CN's ROE is -1.61%, compared to TRIL.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCUR.CN is less volatile compared to TRIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCUR.CN.