Metcash Limited
Metcash Limited MCSHF Peers
See (MCSHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCSHF | $2.10 | N/A | 2.31B | 14.00 | $0.15 | +3.38% |
| JRONF | $21.50 | N/A | 13.53B | 19.20 | $1.12 | +2.75% |
| BZLFF | $34.25 | N/A | 11.16B | 17.47 | $1.96 | +2.60% |
| BZLFY | $16.73 | +1.09% | 10.90B | 17.07 | $0.98 | +4.62% |
| BDDDY | $24.57 | +1.48% | 8.23B | 18.47 | $1.33 | N/A |
| BPPPF | $23.75 | N/A | 8.00B | 18.27 | $1.30 | +1.46% |
| JRONY | $48.39 | -0.77% | 7.60B | 21.80 | $2.22 | N/A |
| ATAAY | $6.09 | N/A | 3.21B | 9.37 | $0.65 | +0.16% |
| OLGPF | $0.71 | +15.28% | 2.69B | 70.90 | $0.01 | +5.77% |
| MSHXF | $42.85 | N/A | 1.86B | 11.90 | $3.60 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
MCSHF vs JRONF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, JRONF has a market cap of 13.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while JRONF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas JRONF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to JRONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs BZLFF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, BZLFF has a market cap of 11.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while BZLFF trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BZLFF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZLFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to BZLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs BZLFY Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, BZLFY has a market cap of 10.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while BZLFY trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BZLFY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZLFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to BZLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs BDDDY Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, BDDDY has a market cap of 8.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while BDDDY trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BDDDY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDDDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to BDDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs BPPPF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, BPPPF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while BPPPF trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BPPPF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to BPPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs JRONY Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, JRONY has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while JRONY trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas JRONY's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to JRONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs ATAAY Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, ATAAY has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while ATAAY trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ATAAY's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to ATAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs OLGPF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, OLGPF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while OLGPF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OLGPF's P/E ratio is 70.90. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to OLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs MSHXF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, MSHXF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while MSHXF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MSHXF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSHXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to MSHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs KARNF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, KARNF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while KARNF trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KARNF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KARNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to KARNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs SGPPY Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, SGPPY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while SGPPY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SGPPY's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to SGPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs SGPPF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, SGPPF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while SGPPF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SGPPF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to SGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs ACNFF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, ACNFF has a market cap of 723.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while ACNFF trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ACNFF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to ACNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs DMPLF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, DMPLF has a market cap of 456.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while DMPLF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas DMPLF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMPLF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to DMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs OISXF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, OISXF has a market cap of 259.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while OISXF trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OISXF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OISXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to OISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs GLBGF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, GLBGF has a market cap of 176.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while GLBGF trades at $143.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GLBGF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLBGF's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to GLBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs IVFH Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, IVFH has a market cap of 76.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while IVFH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas IVFH's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVFH's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to IVFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs COLFF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, COLFF has a market cap of 63.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while COLFF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas COLFF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to COLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs EWOOF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, EWOOF has a market cap of 47.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while EWOOF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas EWOOF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EWOOF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to EWOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs AIXND Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, AIXND has a market cap of 40.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while AIXND trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas AIXND's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXND's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to AIXND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs UNMK Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, UNMK has a market cap of 14.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while UNMK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas UNMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to UNMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs OGOFF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, OGOFF has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while OGOFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OGOFF's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGOFF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to OGOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs CEUMF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, CEUMF has a market cap of 3.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while CEUMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CEUMF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEUMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to CEUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs AIXN Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, AIXN has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while AIXN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas AIXN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to AIXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs NHYF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, NHYF has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while NHYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NHYF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHYF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to NHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs MCLE Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, MCLE has a market cap of 970880.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while MCLE trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MCLE's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLE's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to MCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs WDRP Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, WDRP has a market cap of 514875.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while WDRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas WDRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to WDRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs DLAD Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, DLAD has a market cap of 394526.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while DLAD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas DLAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to DLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs ENHD Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, ENHD has a market cap of 190228.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while ENHD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ENHD's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENHD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to ENHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs NCTW Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, NCTW has a market cap of 131328.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while NCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to NCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs ACITF Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, ACITF has a market cap of 37251.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while ACITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ACITF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACITF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to ACITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs JAMN Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, JAMN has a market cap of 13739.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while JAMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas JAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to JAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs VRUS Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, VRUS has a market cap of 2025.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while VRUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas VRUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to VRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs SYBRQ Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, SYBRQ has a market cap of 1883.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while SYBRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SYBRQ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYBRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is less volatile compared to SYBRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs GPDB Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, GPDB has a market cap of 1810.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while GPDB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GPDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to GPDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs NXTH Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, NXTH has a market cap of 740.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while NXTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NXTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXTH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to NXTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs GLCC Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, GLCC has a market cap of 593.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while GLCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GLCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to GLCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs PACV Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, PACV has a market cap of 363.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while PACV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas PACV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACV's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to PACV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.
MCSHF vs LFER Comparison
MCSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCSHF stands at 2.31B. In comparison, LFER has a market cap of 72.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCSHF is priced at $2.10, while LFER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas LFER's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MCSHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LFER's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCSHF is more volatile compared to LFER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCSHF.