Morses Club PLC

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2Z.L has a market cap of 486.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while 0R2Z.L trades at $344.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R2Z.L's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0R2Z.L's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to 0R2Z.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GACA.L has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while GACA.L trades at $155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACA.L's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GACA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to GACA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GACB.L has a market cap of 25.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while GACB.L trades at $134.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACB.L's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GACB.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to GACB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QIG.L has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while 0QIG.L trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QIG.L's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0QIG.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to 0QIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LENZ.L has a market cap of 645.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while LENZ.L trades at $108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LENZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LENZ.L's ROE of +2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and LENZ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PFG.L has a market cap of 571.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while PFG.L trades at $225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFG.L's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PFG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and PFG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FCH.L has a market cap of 360.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while FCH.L trades at $119.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCH.L's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FCH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to FCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IPF.L has a market cap of 323.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while IPF.L trades at $148.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPF.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IPF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to IPF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EQLS.L has a market cap of 282.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while EQLS.L trades at $139.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQLS.L's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EQLS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to EQLS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HAT.L has a market cap of 198.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while HAT.L trades at $452.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAT.L's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HAT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to HAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SUS.L has a market cap of 185.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while SUS.L trades at $1,525.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUS.L's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SUS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to SUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VANQ.L has a market cap of 181.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while VANQ.L trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VANQ.L's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VANQ.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to VANQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 47IE.L has a market cap of 176.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while 47IE.L trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 47IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 47IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and 47IE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ASAI.L has a market cap of 104.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while ASAI.L trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAI.L's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ASAI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to ASAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, APP.L has a market cap of 79.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while APP.L trades at $42.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP.L's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to APP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and APP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TRU.L has a market cap of 77.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while TRU.L trades at $73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRU.L's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TRU.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to TRU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LIT.L has a market cap of 65.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while LIT.L trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIT.L's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to LIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DFCH.L has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while DFCH.L trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCH.L's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DFCH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to DFCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BFSP.L has a market cap of 60.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while BFSP.L trades at $96.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFSP.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BFSP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and BFSP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TIME.L has a market cap of 51.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while TIME.L trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIME.L's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TIME.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to TIME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AWEM.L has a market cap of 42.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while AWEM.L trades at $121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWEM.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AWEM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to AWEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BANK.L has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while BANK.L trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANK.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BANK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to BANK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CIN.L has a market cap of 11.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while CIN.L trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CIN.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MCL.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and CIN.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ORCH.L has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while ORCH.L trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCH.L's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ORCH.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to ORCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VCAP.L has a market cap of 4.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while VCAP.L trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCAP.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VCAP.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to VCAP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LEND.L has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while LEND.L trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEND.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and LEND.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ZAIM.L has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while ZAIM.L trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAIM.L's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZAIM.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and ZAIM.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AMGO.L has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while AMGO.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGO.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AMGO.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L is less volatile compared to AMGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCL.L.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NSF.L has a market cap of 274944.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while NSF.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NSF.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and NSF.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PCF.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while PCF.L trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PCF.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MCL.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and PCF.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TSL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while TSL.L trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TSL.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MCL.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and TSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.

MCL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 46IE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCL.L is priced at $0.21, while 46IE.L trades at $85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCL.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 46IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCL.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 46IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCL.L and 46IE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).