Mountain Boy Minerals Ltd.
Mountain Boy Minerals Ltd. MBYMF Peers
See (MBYMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBYMF | $0.02 | -4.52% | 2.4M | -0.24 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | N/A | 50.5B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $18.20 | +0.85% | 13.4B | 95.79 | $0.19 | +4.09% |
| ANGPY | $7.10 | +3.80% | 11.2B | 28.40 | $0.25 | +0.51% |
| IMPUY | $8.01 | +5.12% | 7.2B | -7.49 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $7.20 | N/A | 6.5B | -6.79 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.42 | N/A | 5.7B | -35.56 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | N/A | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.57 | +2.13% | 3.4B | 19.49 | $0.44 | +0.93% |
| GMINF | $13.64 | -7.21% | 3.1B | 26.23 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MBYMF vs AUXIF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs FNLPF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while FNLPF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 95.79. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ANGPY Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ANGPY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs IMPUY Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUY trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs IMPUF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs OICT Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while OICT trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -35.56. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs NMPNF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs JINFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while JINFF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GMINF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GMINF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs POYYF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs AUCOY Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ZMPLF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 838.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ZMPLF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GLGDF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 543.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GLGDF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 166.25. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ABBRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ABBRF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -28.45. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TPRFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TIHRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SAPLF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SAPLF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GOTRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 235.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GOTRF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BRVMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BRVMF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -73.67. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SLVTF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SLVTF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -33.38. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PAASF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PAASF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PLLHF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BOCOF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs IAUFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while IAUFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs CTNXF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs XANAF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while XANAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SDRC Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SDRC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -248.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BKRRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BKRRF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ARRKF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ARRKF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -22.71. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs LUCRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while LUCRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs INMNF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs OCGSF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while OCGSF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PDLMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TSORF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TSORF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SSVFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SSVFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs CAPTF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while CAPTF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -62.07. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs CHPGF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while CHPGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SMDRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SMDRF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -26.55. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs EMPYF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while EMPYF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ORVMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ORVMF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs DNRSF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while DNRSF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs FREDF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while FREDF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs DNCVF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while DNCVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ADYRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs VLMGF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while VLMGF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PDIV Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PDIV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ELRFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ELRFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SNNGF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SNNGF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs DYNR Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while DYNR trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs MMNGF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while MMNGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs HMRRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TEUTF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TEUTF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs FCSUF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs EQMEF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while EQMEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ACKRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ACKRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs OKPRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs KDKCF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while KDKCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SCTSF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SCTSF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TLSMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ACRG Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs HEGLF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while HEGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SSVRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SSVRF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs MRZLF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while MRZLF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BBBXF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BBBXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs WAMFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while WAMFF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs AGLDF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GLDRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs NAUFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while NAUFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SMOFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SMOFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TBXXF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TBXXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GSMGF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PVGDF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PVGDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GMDMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs EMPPF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while EMPPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SHGDF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs CTMCF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while CTMCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs AUCUF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs GBRRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BRGC Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BRGC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs URVNF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs WEXPF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while WEXPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs HGLD Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs MERG Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs BYRG Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs LGCXF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs PNTRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while PNTRF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs VOYRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ATEPF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ATEPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs CJIMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs AUSVF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SEKZF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SUNPF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SUNPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ESGLF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs KGFMF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while KGFMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs TSLVF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while TSLVF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs ASLRF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs THMG Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while THMG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs SBMCF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while SBMCF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.
MBYMF vs STRFF Comparison
MBYMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBYMF stands at 2.4M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBYMF is priced at $0.02, while STRFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBYMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MBYMF's ROE is -0.79%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MBYMF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBYMF.