MBH Corporation PLC
MBH Corporation PLC MBHCF Peers
See (MBHCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBHCF | $1.00 | N/A | 5.98M | -10.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| VNNVF | $33.75 | N/A | 27.77B | -33.42 | -$1.01 | N/A |
| CLNXF | $37.98 | -0.44% | 26.80B | -542.57 | -$0.07 | +0.19% |
| VONOY | $16.17 | -0.74% | 26.61B | -32.34 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | N/A | 20.60B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +3.57% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | N/A | 20.26B | 40.06 | $1.00 | +3.30% |
| SURDF | $35.04 | -0.01% | 16.49B | 12.60 | $2.78 | +1.36% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | -0.01% | 16.00B | 12.23 | $1.39 | N/A |
| SWPFF | $2.05 | +28.93% | 11.83B | -102.50 | -$0.02 | +6.89% |
| IFSUF | $12.07 | +5.05% | 11.25B | 28.07 | $0.43 | +4.77% |
Stock Comparison
MBHCF vs VNNVF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 27.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VNNVF trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -33.42. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CLNXF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CLNXF trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -542.57. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and CLNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs VONOY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VONOY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -32.34. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs VTAGY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs VTWRF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SURDF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SURDF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SURYY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SWPFF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SWPFF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs IFSUF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while IFSUF trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and IFSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SWPRF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CLILF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CLILF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs AZRGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and AZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs WRFRF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while WRFRF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and WRFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs HULCF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while HULCF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ESRCF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ESRCF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs NXDCF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while NXDCF trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -143.71. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs LEGIF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while LEGIF trades at $83.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 84.79. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SCOTF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs NMEHF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while NMEHF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs HLPPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while HLPPF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and HLPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SSSAF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SSSAF trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and SSSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs HLPPY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while HLPPY trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CWSRF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CWSRF trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 85.07. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs TYTMF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TYTMF trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SSHLY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SSHLY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs FBGBY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs AANNF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while AANNF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and AANNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs VGPBF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VGPBF trades at $92.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CTRGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CTRGF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs IWGFF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while IWGFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CGSHY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs TAGOF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TAGOF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs FBGGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs CNPPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CNPPF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ENTOF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs GRGTF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while GRGTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and GRGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs TAGYY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs WIHLY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SRRLF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SRRLF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs GRNNF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while GRNNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ASGTF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ASGTF trades at $39.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 497.50. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and ASGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs GRDDY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SVLPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SVLPF trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs DUSCF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs HYSNF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs LGMMY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs ICHIF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ICHIF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and ICHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs MEQYF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MEQYF trades at $138.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs EVGPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while EVGPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs VIBVY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs ACNDF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ACNDF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and ACNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SVAUF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 994.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SVAUF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -38.86. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs GRMHF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and GRMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs RLHPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs HYSNY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 885.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while HYSNY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 345.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and HYSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs MMHTF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs PTLKF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SSHLF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 513.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs GBCEY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs KWLGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs JPPSF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SHMSF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SHMSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and SHMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs LSLPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 387.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while LSLPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs MDTWF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and MDTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs SOHOF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 311.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs FXTGY Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 256.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while FXTGY trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs MDPCF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs NTPIF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 250.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while NTPIF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs SDWHF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs RNHEF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs FCRIF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs TPRP Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 153.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TPRP trades at $25,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 463.64. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and TPRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs MRFGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs DLMI Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 140.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while DLMI trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs MSGNF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs BREUF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 98.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while BREUF trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and BREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs AZLCZ Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 96.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while AZLCZ trades at $1,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs OJOC Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs BVERS Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 84.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while BVERS trades at $3,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and BVERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs CRSS Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs MHIVF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 73.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MHIVF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and MHIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs CPTP Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 64.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while CPTP trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs PKTEF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 60.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while PKTEF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ADPPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ADPPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and ADPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs TNHDF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs MDICF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.20M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs LGYSF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs ABCP Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 26.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ABCP trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs PCPDF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 23.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while PCPDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ADHLF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs MNGGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 19.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MNGGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs DIVVZ Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs BCKMF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs ATTGF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs TRPTF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 13.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while TRPTF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and TRPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MBHCF vs MGAG Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while MGAG trades at $300.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs WETH Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while WETH trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs ASPZ Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while ASPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBHCF.
MBHCF vs PRPPF Comparison
MBHCF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBHCF stands at 5.98M. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MBHCF is priced at $1.00, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBHCF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.00, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MBHCF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MBHCF and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).