Mercedes-Benz Group AG
Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MBGAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBGAF | $69.60 | +0.14% | 67B | 9.10 | $7.65 | +7.01% |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $23.11 | -3.38% | 306.7B | 12.65 | $1.86 | +2.67% |
| BYDDF | $12.67 | -1.02% | 119.5B | 63.40 | $0.20 | +1.44% |
| BYDDY | $12.65 | -0.86% | 113.8B | 63.20 | $0.20 | +1.44% |
| MBGYY | $17.39 | +0.69% | 66.9B | 9.10 | $1.91 | +6.89% |
| BAMXF | $106.39 | +3.29% | 65.3B | 7.93 | $13.42 | +4.52% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +0.00% | 63.5B | 7.60 | $13.42 | +4.96% |
| VWAGY | $11.82 | -1.75% | 59.3B | 7.49 | $1.58 | +5.92% |
| VWAPY | $11.79 | -1.17% | 59.1B | 7.46 | $1.58 | +6.03% |
Stock Comparison
MBGAF vs GELYY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GELYY's competition here
MBGAF vs TOYOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 306.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while TOYOF trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check TOYOF's competition here
MBGAF vs BYDDF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BYDDF trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 63.40. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BYDDF's competition here
MBGAF vs BYDDY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BYDDY trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 63.20. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BYDDY's competition here
MBGAF vs MBGYY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while MBGYY trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check MBGYY's competition here
MBGAF vs BAMXF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BAMXF trades at $106.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BAMXF's competition here
MBGAF vs BYMOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BYMOF's competition here
MBGAF vs VWAGY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VWAGY trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VWAGY's competition here
MBGAF vs VWAPY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VWAPY trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VWAPY's competition here
MBGAF vs VLKAF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VLKAF trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VLKAF's competition here
MBGAF vs VLKPF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VLKPF trades at $116.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VLKPF's competition here
MBGAF vs MAHMF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while MAHMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check MAHMF's competition here
MBGAF vs DRPRF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while DRPRF trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check DRPRF's competition here
MBGAF vs DRPRY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while DRPRY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check DRPRY's competition here
MBGAF vs HNDAF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while HNDAF trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check HNDAF's competition here
MBGAF vs TYIDY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while TYIDY trades at $132.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check TYIDY's competition here
MBGAF vs HYMTF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check HYMTF's competition here
MBGAF vs TYIDF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while TYIDF trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check TYIDF's competition here
MBGAF vs SZKMF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while SZKMF trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check SZKMF's competition here
MBGAF vs SZKMY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while SZKMY trades at $58.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check SZKMY's competition here
MBGAF vs GELHY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GELHY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GELHY's competition here
MBGAF vs GELYF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GELYF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GELYF's competition here
MBGAF vs HYMLF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check HYMLF's competition here
MBGAF vs GWLLF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GWLLF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GWLLF's competition here
MBGAF vs BMWYY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BMWYY's competition here
MBGAF vs EXXRF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while EXXRF trades at $88.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -24.90. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check EXXRF's competition here
MBGAF vs XPNGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while XPNGF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check XPNGF's competition here
MBGAF vs GWLLY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GWLLY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GWLLY's competition here
MBGAF vs FUJHY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while FUJHY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check FUJHY's competition here
MBGAF vs POAHF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while POAHF trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check POAHF's competition here
MBGAF vs FUJHF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while FUJHF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check FUJHF's competition here
MBGAF vs POAHY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while POAHY trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check POAHY's competition here
MBGAF vs ISUZY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ISUZY trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ISUZY's competition here
MBGAF vs YAMHY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check YAMHY's competition here
MBGAF vs DNFGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while DNFGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check DNFGF's competition here
MBGAF vs RNLSY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while RNLSY trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check RNLSY's competition here
MBGAF vs GNZUF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GNZUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GNZUF's competition here
MBGAF vs NIOIF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NIOIF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -11.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NIOIF's competition here
MBGAF vs RNSDF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while RNSDF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check RNSDF's competition here
MBGAF vs JCYCF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check JCYCF's competition here
MBGAF vs ISUZF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ISUZF's competition here
MBGAF vs JCYGY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check JCYGY's competition here
MBGAF vs NSANF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NSANF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NSANF's competition here
MBGAF vs NSANY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NSANY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NSANY's competition here
MBGAF vs DNFGY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while DNFGY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -113.28. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check DNFGY's competition here
MBGAF vs VLVOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VLVOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VLVOF's competition here
MBGAF vs VLVCY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while VLVCY trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 544.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check VLVCY's competition here
MBGAF vs YMHAY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while YMHAY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check YMHAY's competition here
MBGAF vs YAMHF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while YAMHF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check YAMHF's competition here
MBGAF vs IVCGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while IVCGF trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check IVCGF's competition here
MBGAF vs MZDAY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while MZDAY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check MZDAY's competition here
MBGAF vs MZDAF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while MZDAF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check MZDAF's competition here
MBGAF vs YADGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while YADGF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check YADGF's competition here
MBGAF vs MMTOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while MMTOF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check MMTOF's competition here
MBGAF vs SMEBF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while SMEBF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check SMEBF's competition here
MBGAF vs BCAUF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BCAUF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BCAUF's competition here
MBGAF vs BCCMY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BCCMY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BCCMY's competition here
MBGAF vs BMCLF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BMCLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BMCLF's competition here
MBGAF vs HINOY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while HINOY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check HINOY's competition here
MBGAF vs NFYEF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NFYEF trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NFYEF's competition here
MBGAF vs HINOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check HINOF's competition here
MBGAF vs FOVSY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 936.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while FOVSY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check FOVSY's competition here
MBGAF vs NSNHF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NSNHF's competition here
MBGAF vs ELMWQ Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ELMWQ's competition here
MBGAF vs AMGDF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 784.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while AMGDF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check AMGDF's competition here
MBGAF vs ARGGY Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 750.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ARGGY trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ARGGY's competition here
MBGAF vs PIAGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while PIAGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check PIAGF's competition here
MBGAF vs KRSOF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check KRSOF's competition here
MBGAF vs RIDEQ Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check RIDEQ's competition here
MBGAF vs NRDE Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NRDE trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NRDE's competition here
MBGAF vs FHYDF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while FHYDF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check FHYDF's competition here
MBGAF vs LFEV Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while LFEV trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check LFEV's competition here
MBGAF vs ELMSQ Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ELMSQ's competition here
MBGAF vs SEVCF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check SEVCF's competition here
MBGAF vs CSBI Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while CSBI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check CSBI's competition here
MBGAF vs EVTGF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check EVTGF's competition here
MBGAF vs FSRNQ Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check FSRNQ's competition here
MBGAF vs ELCR Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ELCR's competition here
MBGAF vs TUGAF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check TUGAF's competition here
MBGAF vs GKIT Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 494.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GKIT's competition here
MBGAF vs ELEK Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 279.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ELEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ELEK's competition here
MBGAF vs BINI Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 273.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while BINI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check BINI's competition here
MBGAF vs GACR Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check GACR's competition here
MBGAF vs EGOXF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to EGOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check EGOXF's competition here
MBGAF vs RONN Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 7.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check RONN's competition here
MBGAF vs ELIO Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ELIO's competition here
MBGAF vs ARVLF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check ARVLF's competition here
MBGAF vs NDVR Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NDVR's competition here
MBGAF vs NVYAF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check NVYAF's competition here
MBGAF vs DDAIF Comparison February 2026
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 67B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $69.60, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.10, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.Check DDAIF's competition here