Mercedes-Benz Group AG
Mercedes-Benz Group AG MBGAF Peers
See (MBGAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBGAF | $59.70 | +1.96% | 57.5B | 5.71 | $10.45 | +9.35% |
| TOYOF | $18.60 | +0.27% | 242.7B | 7.44 | $2.50 | +3.30% |
| BYDDF | $51.11 | -4.82% | 153.9B | 23.88 | $2.14 | +0.81% |
| BYDDY | $102.29 | -4.70% | 70.2B | 23.96 | $4.27 | +0.80% |
| MBGYY | $14.90 | +2.14% | 57.4B | 5.78 | $2.58 | +8.20% |
| VLKAF | $112.26 | +3.70% | 55.9B | 5.34 | $21.03 | +13.50% |
| BAMXF | $90.05 | +1.23% | 55.8B | 7.51 | $11.99 | +5.38% |
| VWAGY | $11.05 | +1.10% | 55.5B | 5.24 | $2.11 | +14.19% |
| VWAPY | $10.85 | +0.61% | 55.3B | 5.17 | $2.10 | +13.83% |
| VLKPF | $109.00 | +0.00% | 54.7B | 5.17 | $21.10 | +14.29% |
Stock Comparison
MBGAF vs TOYOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while TOYOF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BYDDF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BYDDF trades at $51.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BYDDY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BYDDY trades at $102.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs MBGYY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while MBGYY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VLKAF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VLKAF trades at $112.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BAMXF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BAMXF trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VWAGY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VWAGY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VWAPY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VWAPY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VLKPF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VLKPF trades at $109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BYMOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BYMOF trades at $81.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs DRPRF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while DRPRF trades at $52.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs HNDAF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while HNDAF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs MAHMF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs TYIDY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while TYIDY trades at $128.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs TYIDF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while TYIDF trades at $124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs HYMTF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GWLLF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GWLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs SZKMF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while SZKMF trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs SZKMY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while SZKMY trades at $50.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GELYY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GELYY trades at $44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GELYF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GELYF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs HYMLF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs DRPRY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while DRPRY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs EXXRF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while EXXRF trades at $95.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BMWYY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs XPNGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while XPNGF trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs RNLSY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while RNLSY trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs RNSDF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs FUJHF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while FUJHF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs FUJHY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while FUJHY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GWLLY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GWLLY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs YAMHY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs POAHF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while POAHF trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ISUZY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ISUZY trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GNZUF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GNZUF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NSANY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NSANY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ISUZF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ISUZF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NSANF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NSANF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs JCYGY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while JCYGY trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NIOIF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NIOIF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs YMHAY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while YMHAY trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs JCYCF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs YAMHF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while YAMHF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs POAHY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while POAHY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VLVOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VLVOF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs VLVCY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while VLVCY trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs IVCGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while IVCGF trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs DNFGY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs DNFGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs MZDAF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while MZDAF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs MMTOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while MMTOF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs YADGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while YADGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs MZDAY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while MZDAY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs SMEBF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BCCMY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BCCMY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BMCLF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs HINOY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while HINOY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs BCAUF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs HINOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while HINOF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs FOVSY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while FOVSY trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NFYEF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NFYEF trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -367.33. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ARGGY Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ARGGY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs AMGDF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while AMGDF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NSNHF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs PIAGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while PIAGF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs KRSOF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs RIDEQ Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs FHYDF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while FHYDF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NRDE Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NRDE trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs SEVCF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ELMSQ Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ELMSQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ELMWQ Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ELEK Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ELEK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs LFEV Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while LFEV trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs EVTGF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs FSRNQ Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GKIT Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 742.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GKIT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ELCR Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs TUGAF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs RONN Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs GACR Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs CSBI Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ELIO Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NVYAF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs ARVLF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs NDVR Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.
MBGAF vs DDAIF Comparison
MBGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBGAF stands at 57.5B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBGAF is priced at $59.70, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, MBGAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBGAF is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBGAF.