mBank S.A.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MBAKF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MBAKF
mBank S.A. (MBAKF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MBAKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBAKF | $39.88 | +0.00% | 1.7B | -2.34 | -$17.07 | N/A |
| CIHKY | $31.93 | +0.85% | 160.5B | 7.70 | $4.13 | +6.17% |
| CIHHF | $6.25 | +2.97% | 157.6B | 7.53 | $0.83 | +6.53% |
| DBSDF | $46.52 | +6.21% | 128.2B | 15.21 | $2.97 | +4.58% |
| DBSDY | $179.53 | -0.22% | 128B | 15.15 | $11.89 | +4.79% |
| UNCRY | $36.44 | -1.96% | 109.3B | 9.07 | $4.00 | +4.11% |
| UNCFF | $71.47 | -4.80% | 107.7B | 9.20 | $8.00 | +4.51% |
| IITSF | $6.14 | -3.15% | 106.6B | 9.29 | $0.66 | +6.61% |
| BNPQY | $48.55 | -2.14% | 106.2B | 8.11 | $5.95 | +2.32% |
| BNPQF | $97.95 | -1.23% | 104.5B | 7.97 | $11.91 | +8.82% |
Stock Comparison
MBAKF vs CIHKY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 160.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CIHKY trades at $31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CIHKY's competition here
MBAKF vs CIHHF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CIHHF trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CIHHF's competition here
MBAKF vs DBSDF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DBSDF trades at $46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DBSDF's competition here
MBAKF vs DBSDY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DBSDY trades at $179.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DBSDY's competition here
MBAKF vs UNCRY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while UNCRY trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check UNCRY's competition here
MBAKF vs UNCFF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while UNCFF trades at $71.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check UNCFF's competition here
MBAKF vs IITSF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while IITSF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check IITSF's competition here
MBAKF vs BNPQY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BNPQY trades at $48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BNPQY's competition here
MBAKF vs BNPQF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BNPQF trades at $97.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BNPQF's competition here
MBAKF vs KBCSY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while KBCSY trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check KBCSY's competition here
MBAKF vs MZHOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MZHOF trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MZHOF's competition here
MBAKF vs SBKFF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SBKFF trades at $105.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SBKFF's competition here
MBAKF vs CAIXY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CAIXY trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CAIXY's competition here
MBAKF vs CIXPF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CIXPF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CIXPF's competition here
MBAKF vs EBKDY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while EBKDY trades at $54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check EBKDY's competition here
MBAKF vs OVCHY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while OVCHY trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check OVCHY's competition here
MBAKF vs BREJY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BREJY's competition here
MBAKF vs LLDTF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while LLDTF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check LLDTF's competition here
MBAKF vs OVCHF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while OVCHF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check OVCHF's competition here
MBAKF vs CHCJY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CHCJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CHCJY's competition here
MBAKF vs PSBKF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PSBKF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PSBKF's competition here
MBAKF vs JPSTF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while JPSTF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check JPSTF's competition here
MBAKF vs AKSJF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check AKSJF's competition here
MBAKF vs LLOBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while LLOBF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check LLOBF's competition here
MBAKF vs PSTVY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSTVY has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PSTVY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PSTVY's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSTVY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PSTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PSTVY's competition here
MBAKF vs CHBJF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CHBJF's competition here
MBAKF vs NRDBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while NRDBY trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check NRDBY's competition here
MBAKF vs JPPTY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while JPPTY trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check JPPTY's competition here
MBAKF vs BHKLY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BHKLY trades at $111.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BHKLY's competition here
MBAKF vs NBNKF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while NBNKF trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check NBNKF's competition here
MBAKF vs BNKHF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BNKHF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BNKHF's competition here
MBAKF vs CRARF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CRARF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CRARF's competition here
MBAKF vs CRARY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CRARY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CRARY's competition here
MBAKF vs SCGLY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SCGLY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SCGLY's competition here
MBAKF vs SCGLF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SCGLF trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SCGLF's competition here
MBAKF vs PBCRF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PBCRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PBCRF's competition here
MBAKF vs KBCSF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while KBCSF trades at $122.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check KBCSF's competition here
MBAKF vs PBCRY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PBCRY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PBCRY's competition here
MBAKF vs UOVEY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while UOVEY trades at $57.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check UOVEY's competition here
MBAKF vs UOVEF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while UOVEF trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check UOVEF's competition here
MBAKF vs STNDF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check STNDF's competition here
MBAKF vs DNBBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DNBBY trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DNBBY's competition here
MBAKF vs DNBBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DNBBF trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DNBBF's competition here
MBAKF vs EBKOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while EBKOF trades at $108.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check EBKOF's competition here
MBAKF vs CRZBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CRZBY trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CRZBY's competition here
MBAKF vs DNKEY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DNKEY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DNKEY's competition here
MBAKF vs CRZBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CRZBF trades at $35.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CRZBF's competition here
MBAKF vs SWDBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SWDBY trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SWDBY's competition here
MBAKF vs SWDBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SWDBF trades at $33.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SWDBF's competition here
MBAKF vs DNSKF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while DNSKF trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check DNSKF's competition here
MBAKF vs MLYBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MLYBY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MLYBY's competition here
MBAKF vs HSNGY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while HSNGY trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check HSNGY's competition here
MBAKF vs SVKEF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SVKEF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SVKEF's competition here
MBAKF vs MLYNF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MLYNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MLYNF's competition here
MBAKF vs OTPBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while OTPBF trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check OTPBF's competition here
MBAKF vs JPHLF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while JPHLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check JPHLF's competition here
MBAKF vs BLMIF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BLMIF trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BLMIF's competition here
MBAKF vs JPPHY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while JPPHY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check JPPHY's competition here
MBAKF vs PPERF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PPERF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PPERF's competition here
MBAKF vs GBOOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while GBOOF trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check GBOOF's competition here
MBAKF vs GBOOY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while GBOOY trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check GBOOY's competition here
MBAKF vs SBGOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SBGOF trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SBGOF's competition here
MBAKF vs PSZKF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PSZKF trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PSZKF's competition here
MBAKF vs BKHYY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKHYY trades at $120.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKHYY's competition here
MBAKF vs BKHPF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKHPF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKHPF's competition here
MBAKF vs PSZKY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PSZKY trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PSZKY's competition here
MBAKF vs SGBLY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SGBLY trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SGBLY's competition here
MBAKF vs HSNGF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while HSNGF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check HSNGF's competition here
MBAKF vs BKRKY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKRKY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKRKY's competition here
MBAKF vs CKHGY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CKHGY trades at $126.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CKHGY's competition here
MBAKF vs CKHGF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CKHGF trades at $247.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CKHGF's competition here
MBAKF vs BKRKF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKRKF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKRKF's competition here
MBAKF vs RSNHF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while RSNHF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check RSNHF's competition here
MBAKF vs CEBCF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CEBCF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CEBCF's competition here
MBAKF vs BDORY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BDORY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BDORY's competition here
MBAKF vs PPERY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PPERY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PPERY's competition here
MBAKF vs CGMBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CGMBF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CGMBF's competition here
MBAKF vs CMAKY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CMAKY trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CMAKY's competition here
MBAKF vs FCNCB Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while FCNCB trades at $1,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check FCNCB's competition here
MBAKF vs SUTNY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while SUTNY trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check SUTNY's competition here
MBAKF vs AIBGY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while AIBGY trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check AIBGY's competition here
MBAKF vs AIBRF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while AIBRF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check AIBRF's competition here
MBAKF vs CIMDF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CIMDF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CIMDF's competition here
MBAKF vs CMTDF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while CMTDF trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check CMTDF's competition here
MBAKF vs BNCZF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BNCZF trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BNCZF's competition here
MBAKF vs BPXXY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BPXXY trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BPXXY's competition here
MBAKF vs MZTFF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MZTFF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MZTFF trades at $75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MZTFF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MZTFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MZTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MZTFF's competition here
MBAKF vs MDIBF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MDIBF trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MDIBF's competition here
MBAKF vs PBLOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check PBLOF's competition here
MBAKF vs ISNPY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while ISNPY trades at $37.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check ISNPY's competition here
MBAKF vs EGFEF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while EGFEF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check EGFEF's competition here
MBAKF vs BKRIY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKRIY trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKRIY's competition here
MBAKF vs BKZHF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKZHF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKZHF trades at $166.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKZHF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKZHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKZHF's competition here
MBAKF vs BKRIF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BKRIF trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BKRIF's competition here
MBAKF vs BNMDF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNMDF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while BNMDF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas BNMDF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNMDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to BNMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check BNMDF's competition here
MBAKF vs KPCPF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KPCPF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while KPCPF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas KPCPF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KPCPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to KPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check KPCPF's competition here
MBAKF vs GPFOF Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while GPFOF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check GPFOF's competition here
MBAKF vs MDIBY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while MDIBY trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check MDIBY's competition here
MBAKF vs ISDAY Comparison April 2026
MBAKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBAKF stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ISDAY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBAKF is priced at $39.88, while ISDAY trades at $125.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBAKF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.34, whereas ISDAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, MBAKF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISDAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBAKF is more volatile compared to ISDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBAKF.Check ISDAY's competition here