MAV Beauty Brands Inc.

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, KPT.TO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while KPT.TO trades at CA$9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KPT.TO's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to KPT.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is more volatile compared to KPT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check KPT.TO's competition here

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PPB.CN has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while PPB.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PPB.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to PPB.CN's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is less volatile compared to PPB.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check PPB.CN's competition here

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CGII.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while CGII.CN trades at CA$0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGII.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to CGII.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is less volatile compared to CGII.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check CGII.CN's competition here

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, ZRO.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while ZRO.CN trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to ZRO.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is more volatile compared to ZRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check ZRO.CN's competition here

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, WAY.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while WAY.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WAY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to WAY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is more volatile compared to WAY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check WAY.CN's competition here

MAV.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAV.TO stands at 1.7M. In comparison, AHC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAV.TO is priced at CA$0.04, while AHC.TO trades at CA$4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AHC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, MAV.TO's ROE is -2.47%, compared to AHC.TO's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MAV.TO is more volatile compared to AHC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAV.TO.Check AHC.TO's competition here