Maruti Suzuki India Limited
Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MARUTI.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MARUTI.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARUTI.BO | ₹12,591.45 | +0.00% | 4T | 26.52 | ₹475.19 | +1.07% |
| MARUTI.NS | ₹12,599.00 | +0.00% | 4T | 26.53 | ₹474.95 | +1.07% |
| TATAMTRDVR.BO | ₹765.15 | +2.53% | 3.9T | 8.69 | ₹88.07 | N/A |
| TATAMTRDVR.NS | ₹760.00 | -1.13% | 3.7T | 8.64 | ₹88.01 | N/A |
| M&M.NS | ₹3,045.40 | +0.00% | 3.7T | 21.92 | ₹139.86 | +0.83% |
| BAJAJ-AUTO.BO | ₹8,867.30 | +0.00% | 2.5T | 28.44 | ₹318.34 | +2.32% |
| BAJAJ-AUTO.NS | ₹8,868.50 | +0.00% | 2.5T | 28.43 | ₹318.38 | +2.32% |
| EICHERMOT.NS | ₹6,793.00 | +0.00% | 1.9T | 35.44 | ₹194.96 | +1.01% |
| EICHERMOT.BO | ₹6,792.05 | +0.00% | 1.9T | 35.44 | ₹194.93 | +1.01% |
| TVSMOTOR.NS | ₹3,454.20 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 75.12 | ₹46.09 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
MARUTI.BO vs MARUTI.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, MARUTI.NS has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while MARUTI.NS trades at ₹12,599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas MARUTI.NS's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MARUTI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to MARUTI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check MARUTI.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TATAMTRDVR.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TATAMTRDVR.BO has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TATAMTRDVR.BO trades at ₹765.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TATAMTRDVR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATAMTRDVR.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMTRDVR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TATAMTRDVR.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TATAMTRDVR.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TATAMTRDVR.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TATAMTRDVR.NS trades at ₹760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TATAMTRDVR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATAMTRDVR.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMTRDVR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TATAMTRDVR.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs M&M.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, M&M.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while M&M.NS trades at ₹3,045.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas M&M.NS's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to M&M.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to M&M.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check M&M.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs BAJAJ-AUTO.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, BAJAJ-AUTO.BO has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while BAJAJ-AUTO.BO trades at ₹8,867.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas BAJAJ-AUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAJAJ-AUTO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJ-AUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check BAJAJ-AUTO.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, BAJAJ-AUTO.NS has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while BAJAJ-AUTO.NS trades at ₹8,868.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas BAJAJ-AUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAJAJ-AUTO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJ-AUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check BAJAJ-AUTO.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs EICHERMOT.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, EICHERMOT.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while EICHERMOT.NS trades at ₹6,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas EICHERMOT.NS's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EICHERMOT.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to EICHERMOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check EICHERMOT.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs EICHERMOT.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, EICHERMOT.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while EICHERMOT.BO trades at ₹6,792.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas EICHERMOT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EICHERMOT.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to EICHERMOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check EICHERMOT.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TVSMOTOR.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TVSMOTOR.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TVSMOTOR.NS trades at ₹3,454.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TVSMOTOR.NS's P/E ratio is 75.12. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TVSMOTOR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TVSMOTOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TVSMOTOR.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TVSMOTOR.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TVSMOTOR.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TVSMOTOR.BO trades at ₹3,449.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TVSMOTOR.BO's P/E ratio is 75.14. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TVSMOTOR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TVSMOTOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TVSMOTOR.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HYUNDAI.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HYUNDAI.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HYUNDAI.BO trades at ₹1,951.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HYUNDAI.BO's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYUNDAI.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is more volatile compared to HYUNDAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HYUNDAI.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HYUNDAI.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HYUNDAI.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HYUNDAI.NS trades at ₹1,951.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HYUNDAI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYUNDAI.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is more volatile compared to HYUNDAI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HYUNDAI.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TMCV.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TMCV.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TMCV.NS trades at ₹417.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TMCV.NS's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMCV.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TMCV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TMCV.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TMCV.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TMCV.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TMCV.BO trades at ₹417.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TMCV.BO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMCV.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TMCV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TMCV.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TATAMOTORS.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TATAMOTORS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TATAMOTORS.BO trades at ₹309.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TATAMOTORS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATAMOTORS.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMOTORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TATAMOTORS.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TMPV.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TMPV.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TMPV.BO trades at ₹309.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TMPV.BO's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMPV.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TMPV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TMPV.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TMPV.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TMPV.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TMPV.NS trades at ₹309.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TMPV.NS's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMPV.NS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TMPV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TMPV.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs TATAMOTORS.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, TATAMOTORS.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while TATAMOTORS.NS trades at ₹309.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas TATAMOTORS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATAMOTORS.NS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMOTORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check TATAMOTORS.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HEROMOTOCO.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HEROMOTOCO.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HEROMOTOCO.BO trades at ₹5,180.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HEROMOTOCO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEROMOTOCO.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to HEROMOTOCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HEROMOTOCO.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HEROMOTOCO.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HEROMOTOCO.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HEROMOTOCO.NS trades at ₹5,172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HEROMOTOCO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEROMOTOCO.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to HEROMOTOCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HEROMOTOCO.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs ATHERENERG.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, ATHERENERG.NS has a market cap of 298.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while ATHERENERG.NS trades at ₹753.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas ATHERENERG.NS's P/E ratio is -33.78. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATHERENERG.NS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to ATHERENERG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check ATHERENERG.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs FORCEMOT.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, FORCEMOT.BO has a market cap of 284.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while FORCEMOT.BO trades at ₹20,685.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas FORCEMOT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FORCEMOT.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to FORCEMOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check FORCEMOT.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs FORCEMOT.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, FORCEMOT.NS has a market cap of 284.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while FORCEMOT.NS trades at ₹20,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas FORCEMOT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FORCEMOT.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to FORCEMOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check FORCEMOT.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs OLAELEC.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, OLAELEC.NS has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while OLAELEC.NS trades at ₹23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas OLAELEC.NS's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OLAELEC.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to OLAELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check OLAELEC.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs SMLISUZU.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, SMLISUZU.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while SMLISUZU.NS trades at ₹3,953.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas SMLISUZU.NS's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMLISUZU.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to SMLISUZU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check SMLISUZU.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs SMLMAH.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, SMLMAH.NS has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while SMLMAH.NS trades at ₹3,953.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas SMLMAH.NS's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMLMAH.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to SMLMAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check SMLMAH.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs SMLISUZU.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, SMLISUZU.BO has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while SMLISUZU.BO trades at ₹3,954.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas SMLISUZU.BO's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMLISUZU.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to SMLISUZU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check SMLISUZU.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs SMLMAH.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, SMLMAH.BO has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while SMLMAH.BO trades at ₹3,954.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas SMLMAH.BO's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMLMAH.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to SMLMAH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check SMLMAH.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs ATULAUTO.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, ATULAUTO.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while ATULAUTO.NS trades at ₹415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas ATULAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATULAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to ATULAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check ATULAUTO.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs ATULAUTO.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, ATULAUTO.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while ATULAUTO.BO trades at ₹416.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas ATULAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATULAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is more volatile compared to ATULAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check ATULAUTO.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs SCOOTER.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, SCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while SCOOTER.BO trades at ₹78.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas SCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is -45.84. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCOOTER.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is more volatile compared to SCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check SCOOTER.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HINDMOTORS.NS Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HINDMOTORS.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HINDMOTORS.NS trades at ₹13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HINDMOTORS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HINDMOTORS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to HINDMOTORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HINDMOTORS.NS's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs HINDMOTORS.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, HINDMOTORS.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while HINDMOTORS.BO trades at ₹13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas HINDMOTORS.BO's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HINDMOTORS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to HINDMOTORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check HINDMOTORS.BO's competition here
MARUTI.BO vs REMLIFE.BO Comparison March 2026
MARUTI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARUTI.BO stands at 4T. In comparison, REMLIFE.BO has a market cap of 749.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARUTI.BO is priced at ₹12,591.45, while REMLIFE.BO trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARUTI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.52, whereas REMLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, MARUTI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REMLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MARUTI.BO is less volatile compared to REMLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARUTI.BO.Check REMLIFE.BO's competition here