Manolete Partners Plc
Manolete Partners Plc (MANOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MANOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANOF | $0.76 | +0.00% | 36.4M | 41.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| EXPGY | $34.64 | +0.00% | 33.1B | 24.45 | $1.48 | +1.75% |
| EXPGF | $34.25 | -0.93% | 31.3B | 23.14 | $1.48 | +1.86% |
| SGSOY | $12.20 | +0.00% | 23.6B | 27.18 | $0.45 | +3.15% |
| SGSOF | $121.87 | +0.00% | 23.5B | 29.80 | $4.09 | +2.97% |
| BVVBY | $65.21 | +0.00% | 15.1B | 19.91 | $3.42 | +3.11% |
| BVRDF | $32.23 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 18.85 | $1.71 | +3.29% |
| CPBLF | $16.10 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 42.37 | $0.38 | +1.69% |
| BYCRF | $42.33 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 28.60 | $1.48 | +1.39% |
| DKSHF | $70.01 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 17.95 | $3.90 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
MANOF vs EXPGY Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while EXPGY trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check EXPGY's competition here
MANOF vs EXPGF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while EXPGF trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check EXPGF's competition here
MANOF vs SGSOY Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while SGSOY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check SGSOY's competition here
MANOF vs SGSOF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while SGSOF trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and SGSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGSOF's competition here
MANOF vs BVVBY Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while BVVBY trades at $65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check BVVBY's competition here
MANOF vs BVRDF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while BVRDF trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and BVRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVRDF's competition here
MANOF vs CPBLF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while CPBLF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and CPBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPBLF's competition here
MANOF vs BYCRF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while BYCRF trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and BYCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYCRF's competition here
MANOF vs DKSHF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while DKSHF trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and DKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKSHF's competition here
MANOF vs WPFH Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while WPFH trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check WPFH's competition here
MANOF vs IPSOF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while IPSOF trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and IPSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPSOF's competition here
MANOF vs BGPBF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and BGPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGPBF's competition here
MANOF vs AYAG Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 423M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while AYAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and AYAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYAG's competition here
MANOF vs RCDOF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check RCDOF's competition here
MANOF vs GLCP Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GLCP has a market cap of 154.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while GLCP trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas GLCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and GLCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCP's competition here
MANOF vs EUBG Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while EUBG trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check EUBG's competition here
MANOF vs FLCX Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLCX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and FLCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLCX's competition here
MANOF vs KMNCF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while KMNCF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and KMNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMNCF's competition here
MANOF vs DFCO Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while DFCO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DFCO's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and DFCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFCO's competition here
MANOF vs GPLS Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while GPLS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check GPLS's competition here
MANOF vs AIMH Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while AIMH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check AIMH's competition here
MANOF vs GTVH Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTVH's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check GTVH's competition here
MANOF vs VIZC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check VIZC's competition here
MANOF vs BLDV Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check BLDV's competition here
MANOF vs INTO Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while INTO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INTO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and INTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTO's competition here
MANOF vs ENCC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 798K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while ENCC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check ENCC's competition here
MANOF vs QPRC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 693.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while QPRC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and QPRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QPRC's competition here
MANOF vs AERS Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 539.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while AERS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and AERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AERS's competition here
MANOF vs ADHC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 531.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check ADHC's competition here
MANOF vs SGDH Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 245.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while SGDH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and SGDH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGDH's competition here
MANOF vs DCAC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and DCAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCAC's competition here
MANOF vs MRDH Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while MRDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and MRDH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRDH's competition here
MANOF vs LGBS Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while LGBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and LGBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGBS's competition here
MANOF vs PCHK Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 120.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and PCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHK's competition here
MANOF vs SYNJ Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and SYNJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYNJ's competition here
MANOF vs DEQI Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 92.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and DEQI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DEQI's competition here
MANOF vs MSYN Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOF.Check MSYN's competition here
MANOF vs ITEC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITEC's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and ITEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITEC's competition here
MANOF vs CSLI Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 64.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and CSLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSLI's competition here
MANOF vs AMMJ Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 55.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and AMMJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMMJ's competition here
MANOF vs STWC Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 35.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while STWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and STWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STWC's competition here
MANOF vs FUGI Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while FUGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUGI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and FUGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUGI's competition here
MANOF vs HDST Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and HDST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDST's competition here
MANOF vs ISAT Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ISAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while ISAT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and ISAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISAT's competition here
MANOF vs GLSEF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GLSEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and GLSEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLSEF's competition here
MANOF vs RPSGF Comparison February 2026
MANOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANOF stands at 36.4M. In comparison, RPSGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MANOF is priced at $0.76, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANOF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.50, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, MANOF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MANOF and RPSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPSGF's competition here