Marks and Spencer Group plc
Marks and Spencer Group plc MAKSF Peers
See (MAKSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKSF | $4.54 | +5.83% | 9.2B | 23.89 | $0.19 | +1.05% |
| AONNY | $32.12 | +2.36% | 27.3B | 138.07 | $0.23 | +0.60% |
| SVTMF | $15.54 | +0.02% | 19B | 12.70 | $1.22 | +1.50% |
| AONNF | $27.63 | +0.00% | 17.2B | 81.48 | $0.23 | +1.44% |
| RYKKY | $48.42 | +8.52% | 11.9B | 33.62 | $1.33 | +0.46% |
| SMKUY | $1.00 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 50.00 | $0.02 | +1.56% |
| MAKSY | $9.46 | +3.61% | 9.5B | 24.84 | $0.38 | +1.01% |
| SRGHY | $15.57 | -0.27% | 8.4B | 21.89 | $0.71 | +2.20% |
| IMHDF | $21.52 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 19.39 | $1.11 | +1.71% |
| SRHGF | $13.75 | -20.56% | 7.4B | 19.10 | $0.72 | +3.00% |
Stock Comparison
MAKSF vs AONNY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while AONNY trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 138.07. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs SVTMF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SVTMF trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SVTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs AONNF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while AONNF trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 81.48. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and AONNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs RYKKY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while RYKKY trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and RYKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs SMKUY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SMKUY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SMKUY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SMKUY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMKUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to SMKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs MAKSY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while MAKSY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs SRGHY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SRGHY trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs IMHDF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and IMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs SRHGF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SRHGF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SRHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs TOKUY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while TOKUY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and TOKUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs TOKUF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and TOKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs RYKKF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while RYKKF trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and RYKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs WLWHF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and WLWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LRENY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LRENY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs INREF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while INREF trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to INREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs SURRY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SURRY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs JFROF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while JFROF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and JFROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs WLWHY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while WLWHY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and WLWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs TKSHF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while TKSHF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and TKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs SURRF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SURRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SURRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs PMDKF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PMDKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs PGCMF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PGCMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PGCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs PMDKY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PMDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs GDNEF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF is less volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKSF.
MAKSF vs PPASF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PPASF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PPASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs PKPYY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PKPYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LCMRF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 858.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LCMRF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and LCMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs RRETY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 756.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while RRETY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and RRETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LENTY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LENTY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and LENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs CBDBY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while CBDBY trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and CBDBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs WHGPF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 213M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -30.83. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and WHGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs SRSCQ Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SRSCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LHUAF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and LHUAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs NWRLY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and NWRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs PKSGY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while PKSGY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and PKSGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs VEST Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while VEST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and VEST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs HDVTY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while HDVTY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and HDVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs BONTQ Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BONTQ has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while BONTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas BONTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BONTQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and BONTQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LFSYY Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LFSYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and LFSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs SHLDQ Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SHLDQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and SHLDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MAKSF vs LFSYF Comparison
MAKSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKSF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LFSYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKSF is priced at $4.54, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.89, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, MAKSF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKSF and LFSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).