Monarch Services, Inc.
Monarch Services, Inc. (MAHI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAHI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAHI | $0.00 | +0.00% | 324 | -0.02 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| IDWM | $40.00 | +0.00% | 98.2B | -0.97 | -$41.14 | N/A |
| RLXXF | $48.65 | +0.62% | 90.3B | 35.54 | $1.39 | +1.74% |
| IFJPY | $24.55 | +1.45% | 16.2B | 163.54 | $0.15 | +2.20% |
| IFPJF | $12.21 | +2.86% | 15.8B | 174.46 | $0.07 | +2.21% |
| PSORF | $14.84 | +3.41% | 10.1B | 16.86 | $0.88 | +2.16% |
| SBSNY | $40.50 | -3.73% | 9.3B | 13.32 | $3.04 | +3.04% |
| SBBTF | $32.99 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 10.85 | $3.04 | +3.10% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 26.57 | $1.03 | +3.74% |
| KDKWF | $24.00 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 66.67 | $0.36 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
MAHI vs IDWM Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while IDWM trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check IDWM's competition here
MAHI vs RLXXF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while RLXXF trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check RLXXF's competition here
MAHI vs IFJPY Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while IFJPY trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 163.54. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check IFJPY's competition here
MAHI vs IFPJF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while IFPJF trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 174.46. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and IFPJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFPJF's competition here
MAHI vs PSORF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while PSORF trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and PSORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSORF's competition here
MAHI vs SBSNY Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SBSNY trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and SBSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBSNY's competition here
MAHI vs SBBTF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SBBTF trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and SBBTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBBTF's competition here
MAHI vs SBSNF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check SBSNF's competition here
MAHI vs KDKWF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while KDKWF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and KDKWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDKWF's competition here
MAHI vs SHXWF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and SHXWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHXWF's competition here
MAHI vs CNGO Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check CNGO's competition here
MAHI vs FRNWF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while FRNWF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check FRNWF's competition here
MAHI vs RZSMF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while RZSMF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check RZSMF's competition here
MAHI vs MDDCF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and MDDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDDCF's competition here
MAHI vs GPOPF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and GPOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPOPF's competition here
MAHI vs STRYF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check STRYF's competition here
MAHI vs TOCOF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and TOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOCOF's competition here
MAHI vs GWOX Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while GWOX trades at $409.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and GWOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWOX's competition here
MAHI vs PCDAF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check PCDAF's competition here
MAHI vs YLWDF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while YLWDF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and YLWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLWDF's competition here
MAHI vs CMTX Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while CMTX trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check CMTX's competition here
MAHI vs SMWPY Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check SMWPY's competition here
MAHI vs HKGEF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while HKGEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check HKGEF's competition here
MAHI vs STAOF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and STAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAOF's competition here
MAHI vs GLMFF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while GLMFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and GLMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLMFF's competition here
MAHI vs SADL Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SADL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check SADL's competition here
MAHI vs XLMDF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while XLMDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and XLMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XLMDF's competition here
MAHI vs DTRL Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while DTRL trades at $285.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check DTRL's competition here
MAHI vs FPNUF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check FPNUF's competition here
MAHI vs FMPR Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while FMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check FMPR's competition here
MAHI vs LEBGF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check LEBGF's competition here
MAHI vs PEDH Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 44.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while PEDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check PEDH's competition here
MAHI vs PDOS Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check PDOS's competition here
MAHI vs ACNI Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 29.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check ACNI's competition here
MAHI vs BKMP Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and BKMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKMP's competition here
MAHI vs DIGI Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and DIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGI's competition here
MAHI vs HRDIL Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and HRDIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRDIL's competition here
MAHI vs HRDI Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and HRDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRDI's competition here
MAHI vs SALN Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHI.Check SALN's competition here
MAHI vs YLWWF Comparison August 2025
MAHI plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHI stands at 324. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAHI is priced at $0.00, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, MAHI's ROE is -0.57%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAHI and YLWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLWWF's competition here