Mac Hotels Limited
Mac Hotels Limited (MACH.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MACH.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MACH.BO | ₹81.90 | +0.00% | 461.2M | 170.63 | ₹0.48 | N/A |
| INDHOTEL.BO | ₹583.05 | -0.44% | 829.9B | 49.12 | ₹11.87 | +0.39% |
| INDHOTEL.NS | ₹582.75 | -0.42% | 829.5B | 41.33 | ₹14.10 | +0.39% |
| EIHOTEL.NS | ₹288.20 | +2.93% | 180.2B | 28.01 | ₹10.29 | +0.52% |
| EIHOTEL.BO | ₹287.90 | +2.82% | 180B | 27.08 | ₹10.63 | +0.52% |
| CHALET.BO | ₹728.90 | +1.60% | 159.6B | 26.35 | ₹27.66 | +0.14% |
| CHALET.NS | ₹728.50 | +1.50% | 159.5B | 26.33 | ₹27.67 | +0.14% |
| THELEELA.NS | ₹415.90 | -0.30% | 138.9B | 35.76 | ₹11.63 | N/A |
| VENTIVE.NS | ₹574.25 | -0.51% | 134.1B | 36.58 | ₹15.70 | N/A |
| LEMONTREE.NS | ₹108.24 | +0.41% | 85.7B | 38.94 | ₹2.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MACH.BO vs INDHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, INDHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 829.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while INDHOTEL.BO trades at ₹583.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas INDHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.12. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to INDHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check INDHOTEL.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs INDHOTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, INDHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 829.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while INDHOTEL.NS trades at ₹582.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas INDHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to INDHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check INDHOTEL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs EIHOTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, EIHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while EIHOTEL.NS trades at ₹288.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas EIHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check EIHOTEL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs EIHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, EIHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while EIHOTEL.BO trades at ₹287.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas EIHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check EIHOTEL.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs CHALET.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, CHALET.BO has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while CHALET.BO trades at ₹728.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas CHALET.BO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHALET.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to CHALET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check CHALET.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs CHALET.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, CHALET.NS has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while CHALET.NS trades at ₹728.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas CHALET.NS's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHALET.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to CHALET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check CHALET.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs THELEELA.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, THELEELA.NS has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while THELEELA.NS trades at ₹415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas THELEELA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THELEELA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to THELEELA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check THELEELA.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs VENTIVE.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, VENTIVE.NS has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while VENTIVE.NS trades at ₹574.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas VENTIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VENTIVE.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to VENTIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check VENTIVE.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs LEMONTREE.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, LEMONTREE.NS has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while LEMONTREE.NS trades at ₹108.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas LEMONTREE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEMONTREE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to LEMONTREE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check LEMONTREE.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs LEMONTREE.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, LEMONTREE.BO has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while LEMONTREE.BO trades at ₹108.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas LEMONTREE.BO's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEMONTREE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to LEMONTREE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check LEMONTREE.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs JUNIPER.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, JUNIPER.NS has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while JUNIPER.NS trades at ₹203.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas JUNIPER.NS's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUNIPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to JUNIPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check JUNIPER.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs ITDC.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ITDC.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ITDC.NS trades at ₹405.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ITDC.NS's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITDC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ITDC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ITDC.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs ITDC.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ITDC.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ITDC.BO trades at ₹404.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ITDC.BO's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITDC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ITDC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ITDC.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs SAMHI.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, SAMHI.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while SAMHI.BO trades at ₹136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas SAMHI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAMHI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to SAMHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check SAMHI.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs SAMHI.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, SAMHI.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while SAMHI.NS trades at ₹136.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas SAMHI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAMHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to SAMHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check SAMHI.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs PARKHOTELS.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, PARKHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while PARKHOTELS.NS trades at ₹107.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas PARKHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PARKHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to PARKHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check PARKHOTELS.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs BRIGHOTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while BRIGHOTEL.NS trades at ₹58.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas BRIGHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 46.21. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check BRIGHOTEL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs TAJGVK.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, TAJGVK.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while TAJGVK.NS trades at ₹316.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas TAJGVK.NS's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAJGVK.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to TAJGVK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check TAJGVK.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs TAJGVK.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, TAJGVK.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while TAJGVK.BO trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas TAJGVK.BO's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAJGVK.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to TAJGVK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check TAJGVK.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs EIHAHOTELS.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while EIHAHOTELS.NS trades at ₹292.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas EIHAHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check EIHAHOTELS.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs EIHAHOTELS.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while EIHAHOTELS.BO trades at ₹291.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas EIHAHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check EIHAHOTELS.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs ORIENTHOT.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ORIENTHOT.NS trades at ₹89.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ORIENTHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORIENTHOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ORIENTHOT.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs ORIENTHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ORIENTHOT.BO trades at ₹89.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ORIENTHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORIENTHOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ORIENTHOT.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs VHLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, VHLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while VHLTD.NS trades at ₹139.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas VHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to VHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check VHLTD.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs ROHLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ROHLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ROHLTD.BO trades at ₹314.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ROHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ROHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ROHLTD.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs ROHLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ROHLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ROHLTD.NS trades at ₹313.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ROHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ROHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ROHLTD.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs ASIANHOTNR.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ASIANHOTNR.BO trades at ₹305.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ASIANHOTNR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ASIANHOTNR.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs ASIANHOTNR.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ASIANHOTNR.NS trades at ₹293.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ASIANHOTNR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ASIANHOTNR.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs HLVLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, HLVLTD.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while HLVLTD.BO trades at ₹7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas HLVLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLVLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to HLVLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check HLVLTD.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs HLVLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, HLVLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while HLVLTD.NS trades at ₹7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas HLVLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 109.71. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLVLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to HLVLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check HLVLTD.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs KAMATHOTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, KAMATHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while KAMATHOTEL.NS trades at ₹160.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas KAMATHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to KAMATHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check KAMATHOTEL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs KAMATHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, KAMATHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while KAMATHOTEL.BO trades at ₹159.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas KAMATHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check KAMATHOTEL.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs ADVANIHOTR.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ADVANIHOTR.BO trades at ₹50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ADVANIHOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ADVANIHOTR.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs ADVANIHOTR.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while ADVANIHOTR.NS trades at ₹50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas ADVANIHOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check ADVANIHOTR.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs SINCLAIR.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, SINCLAIR.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while SINCLAIR.NS trades at ₹76.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas SINCLAIR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SINCLAIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to SINCLAIR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check SINCLAIR.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs RHL.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, RHL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while RHL.BO trades at ₹173.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas RHL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RHL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to RHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check RHL.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs RHL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, RHL.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while RHL.NS trades at ₹172.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas RHL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RHL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to RHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check RHL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs THEBYKE.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, THEBYKE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while THEBYKE.BO trades at ₹69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas THEBYKE.BO's P/E ratio is -39.39. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THEBYKE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO and THEBYKE.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THEBYKE.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs AHLEAST.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, AHLEAST.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while AHLEAST.NS trades at ₹151.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas AHLEAST.NS's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHLEAST.NS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check AHLEAST.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs APOLSINHOT.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, APOLSINHOT.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while APOLSINHOT.NS trades at ₹1,008.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas APOLSINHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APOLSINHOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to APOLSINHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check APOLSINHOT.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs AHLEAST.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, AHLEAST.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while AHLEAST.BO trades at ₹150.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas AHLEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHLEAST.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check AHLEAST.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs BYKE.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, BYKE.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while BYKE.NS trades at ₹36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas BYKE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BYKE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to BYKE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check BYKE.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs CCHHL.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, CCHHL.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while CCHHL.BO trades at ₹11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas CCHHL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCHHL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to CCHHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check CCHHL.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs CCHHL.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, CCHHL.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while CCHHL.NS trades at ₹11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas CCHHL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCHHL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to CCHHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check CCHHL.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs AHLWEST.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, AHLWEST.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while AHLWEST.NS trades at ₹144.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas AHLWEST.NS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHLWEST.NS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to AHLWEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check AHLWEST.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs HAVISHA.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, HAVISHA.NS has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while HAVISHA.NS trades at ₹1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas HAVISHA.NS's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAVISHA.NS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to HAVISHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check HAVISHA.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs HAVISHA.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, HAVISHA.BO has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while HAVISHA.BO trades at ₹1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas HAVISHA.BO's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAVISHA.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to HAVISHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check HAVISHA.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs BLUECOAST.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, BLUECOAST.BO has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while BLUECOAST.BO trades at ₹20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas BLUECOAST.BO's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLUECOAST.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECOAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check BLUECOAST.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs BLUECOAST.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, BLUECOAST.NS has a market cap of 353.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while BLUECOAST.NS trades at ₹20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas BLUECOAST.NS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLUECOAST.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECOAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check BLUECOAST.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs TGBHOTELS.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while TGBHOTELS.NS trades at ₹8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas TGBHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGBHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check TGBHOTELS.NS's competition here
MACH.BO vs TGBHOTELS.BO Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while TGBHOTELS.BO trades at ₹8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas TGBHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGBHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO is less volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MACH.BO.Check TGBHOTELS.BO's competition here
MACH.BO vs VICEROY.NS Comparison April 2026
MACH.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MACH.BO stands at 461.2M. In comparison, VICEROY.NS has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MACH.BO is priced at ₹81.90, while VICEROY.NS trades at ₹3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MACH.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 170.63, whereas VICEROY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MACH.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VICEROY.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MACH.BO and VICEROY.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VICEROY.NS's competition here