Mitchells & Butlers plc
Mitchells & Butlers plc MAB.L Peers
See (MAB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAB.L | £280.50 | -2.09% | 1.7B | 10.41 | £0.28 | N/A |
| 0HXW.L | £56.74 | +0.94% | 77.2B | 2.38 | £24.05 | N/A |
| CPG.L | £2,514.00 | +1.91% | 42.9B | 39.48 | £0.64 | +2.21% |
| 0VFA.L | £91.92 | -1.27% | 40B | 25.81 | £3.49 | +3.54% |
| 0QKI.L | £516.00 | -0.80% | 26.7B | 16.29 | £31.68 | +3.89% |
| 0I77.L | £218.87 | +0.46% | 25.8B | 27.70 | £7.95 | +2.54% |
| 0M30.L | £46.13 | +3.48% | 16.6B | 22.49 | £1.98 | +1.75% |
| SSPG.L | £186.00 | +7.95% | 1.4B | -57.93 | -£0.03 | +2.13% |
| DOM.L | £255.00 | -0.93% | 1B | 11.22 | £0.23 | +4.26% |
| JDW.L | £769.50 | -0.65% | 851M | 15.50 | £0.51 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
MAB.L vs 0HXW.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HXW.L has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0HXW.L trades at £56.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0HXW.L's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HXW.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0HXW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs CPG.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPG.L has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while CPG.L trades at £2,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas CPG.L's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPG.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to CPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0VFA.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VFA.L has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0VFA.L trades at £91.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0VFA.L's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VFA.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0VFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0QKI.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QKI.L has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0QKI.L trades at £516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0QKI.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QKI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0QKI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0I77.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0I77.L has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0I77.L trades at £218.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0I77.L's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I77.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0I77.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0M30.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0M30.L has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0M30.L trades at £46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0M30.L's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0M30.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0M30.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs SSPG.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SSPG.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while SSPG.L trades at £186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas SSPG.L's P/E ratio is -57.93. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSPG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to SSPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs DOM.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOM.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while DOM.L trades at £255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas DOM.L's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOM.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to DOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs JDW.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JDW.L has a market cap of 851M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while JDW.L trades at £769.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas JDW.L's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JDW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to JDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs YNGN.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YNGN.L has a market cap of 513.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while YNGN.L trades at £620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas YNGN.L's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNGN.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to YNGN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs YNGA.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YNGA.L has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while YNGA.L trades at £945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas YNGA.L's P/E ratio is 59.44. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNGA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to YNGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs RTN.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RTN.L has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while RTN.L trades at £64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas RTN.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTN.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MAB.L has daily volatility of 4.72 and RTN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
MAB.L vs LGRS.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LGRS.L has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while LGRS.L trades at £324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas LGRS.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGRS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to LGRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0KT6.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KT6.L has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0KT6.L trades at £40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0KT6.L's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KT6.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0KT6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs FSTA.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FSTA.L has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while FSTA.L trades at £590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas FSTA.L's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSTA.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to FSTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 53GW.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 53GW.L has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 53GW.L trades at £88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 53GW.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 53GW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 53GW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs DPEU.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DPEU.L has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while DPEU.L trades at £190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas DPEU.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPEU.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to DPEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs MARS.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MARS.L has a market cap of 267.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while MARS.L trades at £41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas MARS.L's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to MARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs CPC.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPC.L has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while CPC.L trades at £139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas CPC.L's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to CPC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs DPP.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DPP.L has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while DPP.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas DPP.L's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPP.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to DPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs FUL.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FUL.L has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while FUL.L trades at £14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas FUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to FUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 54GW.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 54GW.L has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 54GW.L trades at £107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 54GW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 54GW.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 54GW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs VARE.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VARE.L has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while VARE.L trades at £13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas VARE.L's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VARE.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to VARE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs MEX.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MEX.L has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while MEX.L trades at £44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas MEX.L's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEX.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to MEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs RBG.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBG.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while RBG.L trades at £0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas RBG.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBG.L's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to RBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs HVT.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HVT.L has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while HVT.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas HVT.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to HVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs HVTA.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HVTA.L has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while HVTA.L trades at £155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas HVTA.L's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVTA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to HVTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs NGHT.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NGHT.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while NGHT.L trades at £2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas NGHT.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGHT.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to NGHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs COM.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COM.L has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while COM.L trades at £3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas COM.L's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COM.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to COM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs PIER.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PIER.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while PIER.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas PIER.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIER.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to PIER.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs TAST.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TAST.L has a market cap of 988.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while TAST.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas TAST.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAST.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is less volatile compared to TAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs DVT.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DVT.L has a market cap of 567.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while DVT.L trades at £4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas DVT.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to DVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs MORE.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MORE.L has a market cap of 195.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while MORE.L trades at £0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas MORE.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MORE.L's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to MORE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 0RR0.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RR0.L has a market cap of 122.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 0RR0.L trades at £0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 0RR0.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0RR0.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 0RR0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs 92IP.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 92IP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while 92IP.L trades at £95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas 92IP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 92IP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to 92IP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.
MAB.L vs HVTB.L Comparison
MAB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAB.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HVTB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAB.L is priced at £280.50, while HVTB.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.41, whereas HVTB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAB.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HVTB.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAB.L is more volatile compared to HVTB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAB.L.