Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF LYMZ.DE Peers
See (LYMZ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYMZ.DE | €61.09 | +0.00% | 139.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PJSR.DE | €104.90 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PJS1.DE | €98.10 | -0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.38% |
| DBPG.DE | €210.35 | +0.00% | 365.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 18MS.DE | €6.86 | +0.00% | 159.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DXSN.DE | €9.50 | -0.01% | 139.2M | 20.26 | €0.47 | N/A |
| DBPD.DE | €0.54 | +0.00% | 83.1M | 19.14 | €0.03 | N/A |
| DXST.DE | €30.66 | +0.52% | 64.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DBPK.DE | €0.19 | +0.00% | 41.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DXSP.DE | €6.22 | -0.02% | 38.7M | 20.74 | €0.30 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYMZ.DE vs PJSR.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, PJSR.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while PJSR.DE trades at €104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PJSR.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to PJSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs PJS1.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, PJS1.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while PJS1.DE trades at €98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJS1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PJS1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to PJS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DBPG.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DBPG.DE has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DBPG.DE trades at €210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBPG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBPG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DBPG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs 18MS.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, 18MS.DE has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while 18MS.DE trades at €6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 18MS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 18MS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 18MS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DXSN.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DXSN.DE has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DXSN.DE trades at €9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXSN.DE's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXSN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DXSN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DBPD.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DBPD.DE has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DBPD.DE trades at €0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBPD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBPD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to DBPD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DXST.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DXST.DE has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DXST.DE trades at €30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXST.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DXST.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DBPK.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DBPK.DE has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DBPK.DE trades at €0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBPK.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBPK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DBPK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DXSP.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DXSP.DE has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DXSP.DE trades at €6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXSP.DE's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXSP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DXSP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DES2.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DES2.DE has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DES2.DE trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DES2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DES2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to DES2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs DX2K.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, DX2K.DE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while DX2K.DE trades at €3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX2K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DX2K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DX2K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs TAB1.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, TAB1.DE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while TAB1.DE trades at €111.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAB1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAB1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to TAB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs IE00B8K7KM88.SG Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, IE00B8K7KM88.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while IE00B8K7KM88.SG trades at €11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B8K7KM88.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B8K7KM88.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B8K7KM88.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs IE00B7SD4R47.SG Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, IE00B7SD4R47.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while IE00B7SD4R47.SG trades at €471.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B7SD4R47.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B7SD4R47.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B7SD4R47.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs IE00BLS09N40.SG Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, IE00BLS09N40.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while IE00BLS09N40.SG trades at €28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BLS09N40.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BLS09N40.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BLS09N40.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs XBJF.DE Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, XBJF.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while XBJF.DE trades at €42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBJF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBJF.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is more volatile compared to XBJF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.
LYMZ.DE vs LU1327051279.SG Comparison
LYMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYMZ.DE stands at 139.8M. In comparison, LU1327051279.SG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYMZ.DE is priced at €61.09, while LU1327051279.SG trades at €5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LU1327051279.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYMZ.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LU1327051279.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYMZ.DE is less volatile compared to LU1327051279.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYMZ.DE.