Loyalty Ventures Inc.
Loyalty Ventures Inc. LYLT Peers
See (LYLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYLT | $0.22 | N/A | N/A | -0.00 | -$51.23 | N/A |
| MSFT | $452.94 | +0.85% | 3.37T | 35.00 | $12.94 | +0.70% |
| ORCL | $162.94 | +0.41% | 456.92B | 38.16 | $4.27 | +1.05% |
| PLTR | $130.13 | +1.58% | 307.10B | 565.78 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $399.47 | +0.52% | 170.25B | 26.39 | $15.14 | N/A |
| PANW | $190.90 | -0.57% | 126.39B | 108.47 | $1.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $436.05 | -0.94% | 108.61B | -4845.00 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| SNPS | $517.66 | +0.38% | 80.04B | 62.29 | $8.31 | N/A |
| FTNT | $103.23 | -1.73% | 79.01B | 42.48 | $2.43 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYLT vs MSFT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.37T. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while MSFT trades at $452.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ORCL Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 456.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ORCL trades at $162.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PLTR Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 307.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PLTR trades at $130.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 565.78. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ADBE Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ADBE trades at $399.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PANW Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 126.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PANW trades at $190.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CRWD Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 108.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CRWD trades at $436.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4845.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SNPS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 80.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SNPS trades at $517.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 62.29. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FTNT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 79.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FTNT trades at $103.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.48. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs VMW Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs HOOD Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 54.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while HOOD trades at $61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NET Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 53.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NET trades at $154.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -643.71. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SQ Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ZS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 37.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ZS trades at $244.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2444.50. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs XYZ Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 35.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while XYZ trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CRWV Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 31.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CRWV trades at $67.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NETE Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs IOT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 27.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while IOT trades at $47.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -170.50. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GDDY Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GDDY trades at $188.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SPLK Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs TOST Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 26.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while TOST trades at $45.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 166.96. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs VRSN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while VRSN trades at $276.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CPAY Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CPAY trades at $352.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CHKP Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CHKP trades at $214.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NTNX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NTNX trades at $81.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -314.73. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FLT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs OKTA Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while OKTA trades at $123.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2055.67. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs AFRM Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while AFRM trades at $56.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -297.63. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GEN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GEN trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CYBR Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CYBR trades at $354.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -166.55. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FFIV Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FFIV trades at $281.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs RBRK Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while RBRK trades at $84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs MDB Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while MDB trades at $193.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -112.64. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs KSPI Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while KSPI trades at $82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NLOK Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs AKAM Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while AKAM trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SAIL Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SAIL trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs WIX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while WIX trades at $189.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 80.34. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs DOX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while DOX trades at $89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ALTR Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs KVYO Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while KVYO trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -204.88. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PLAN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs DBX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while DBX trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CFLT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CFLT trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.23. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PATH Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PATH trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -101.58. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs HCP Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs JCOM Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs INFA Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while INFA trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 646.17. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SQSP Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs S Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while S trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.99. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FOUR Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FOUR trades at $92.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NEWR Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CCCS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CCCS trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 903.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SPSC Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SPSC trades at $149.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 69.98. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ACIW Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ACIW trades at $49.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs VRNS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while VRNS trades at $45.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -56.44. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs QLYS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while QLYS trades at $135.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NVEI Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs EEFT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while EEFT trades at $110.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs RELY Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while RELY trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -771.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs WEX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while WEX trades at $137.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs BOX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while BOX trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CLBT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CLBT trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs TENB Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while TENB trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -86.82. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs AVPT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while AVPT trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -152.54. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ESMT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs STNE Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while STNE trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.94. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ODD Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ODD trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PAGS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PAGS trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SWI Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CORZZ Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CORZZ trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CORZ Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CORZ trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs EVOP Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs DLO Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while DLO trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs DOCN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while DOCN trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PAYO Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PAYO trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs APPN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while APPN trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -39.72. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs EVTC Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while EVTC trades at $36.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs BB Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while BB trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -389.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs MQ Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while MQ trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs TDC Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while TDC trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FIVN Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FIVN trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -473.17. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GETVV Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs AVDX Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while AVDX trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.25. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs RAMP Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while RAMP trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -744.00. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs EVCM Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while EVCM trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -89.25. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs FORG Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CSGS Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CSGS trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GSKY Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GET Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs AVPTW Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while AVPTW trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs STER Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs NTCT Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while NTCT trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs ZUO Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs RPD Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while RPD trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs TUYA Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while TUYA trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 282.50. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs CORZW Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while CORZW trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs SUMO Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs GB Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.
LYLT vs PAYA Comparison
LYLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYLT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LYLT is priced at $0.22, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYLT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, LYLT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYLT is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYLT.