Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.

LUX.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LUX.CN stands at 15.62M. In comparison, WCN.TO has a market cap of 69.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LUX.CN is priced at $0.10, while WCN.TO trades at $269.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LUX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas WCN.TO's P/E ratio is 79.61. In terms of profitability, LUX.CN's ROE is -8.50%, compared to WCN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUX.CN is less volatile compared to WCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUX.CN.

LUX.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LUX.CN stands at 15.62M. In comparison, GFL.TO has a market cap of 23.94B. Regarding current trading prices, LUX.CN is priced at $0.10, while GFL.TO trades at $67.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LUX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas GFL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.97. In terms of profitability, LUX.CN's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GFL.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUX.CN is less volatile compared to GFL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUX.CN.

LUX.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LUX.CN stands at 15.62M. In comparison, SES.TO has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LUX.CN is priced at $0.10, while SES.TO trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LUX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas SES.TO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, LUX.CN's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SES.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUX.CN is less volatile compared to SES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUX.CN.

LUX.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LUX.CN stands at 15.62M. In comparison, ANRG.TO has a market cap of 224.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LUX.CN is priced at $0.10, while ANRG.TO trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LUX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas ANRG.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LUX.CN's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ANRG.TO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LUX.CN is less volatile compared to ANRG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUX.CN.

LUX.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LUX.CN stands at 15.62M. In comparison, BAC.CN has a market cap of 9.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUX.CN is priced at $0.10, while BAC.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LUX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas BAC.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUX.CN's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BAC.CN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUX.CN and BAC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).