Lundin Mining Corporation
Lundin Mining Corporation LUNMF Peers
See (LUNMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUNMF | $9.12 | +2.54% | 7.91B | 912.00 | $0.01 | +3.12% |
| ANFGF | $24.95 | +6.17% | 24.60B | 29.70 | $0.84 | +1.26% |
| FQVLF | $14.70 | +2.01% | 12.17B | 81.67 | $0.18 | N/A |
| JIAXF | $1.70 | +4.94% | 8.48B | 5.86 | $0.29 | +4.96% |
| AIAGY | $42.98 | -3.07% | 7.51B | 5.40 | $7.96 | +1.11% |
| KGHPF | $32.15 | N/A | 6.43B | 8.46 | $3.80 | +0.61% |
| OZMLF | $19.00 | N/A | 6.41B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| MMLTF | $0.35 | N/A | 4.23B | 17.42 | $0.02 | N/A |
| CSCCF | $5.20 | +2.16% | 3.96B | -34.67 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| AIAGF | $90.00 | +3.02% | 3.93B | 5.65 | $15.92 | +1.83% |
Stock Comparison
LUNMF vs ANFGF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 24.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ANFGF trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs FQVLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 12.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while FQVLF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 81.67. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs JIAXF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while JIAXF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs AIAGY Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while AIAGY trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs KGHPF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while KGHPF trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs OZMLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs MMLTF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while MMLTF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CSCCF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CSCCF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is -34.67. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs AIAGF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while AIAGF trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs SFRRF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while SFRRF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CAMLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 458.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CAMLF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs IPMLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 440.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while IPMLF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ACMDY Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 398.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ACMDY trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ASCUF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 217.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ASCUF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -24.43. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ARREF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 203.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ARREF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs AMRZF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs HLGVF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 142.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs LSANF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 121.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while LSANF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CPPKF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 115.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CPPKF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CPFXF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 95.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CPFXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs HDRSF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 51.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while HDRSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs HHLKF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 48.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while HHLKF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs EMTRF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 43.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while EMTRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CCOXF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs NEVDF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ATCUF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 29.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ATCUF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs QCCUF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 23.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while QCCUF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs DRCMF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CPPMF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CPPMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CPORF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs RKCLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs AGLAF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs BZDLF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 8.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while BZDLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs PNTZF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs WCUFF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 6.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs SLMFF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 5.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while SLMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs USCUF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 5.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while USCUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs BCUFF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while BCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CPCPF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CPCPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ANGUF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs CAEN Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs FVVSF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs BRVRF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs INUMF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 868714.00. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while INUMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs JUBAF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.
LUNMF vs ECMXF Comparison
LUNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUNMF stands at 7.91B. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446859.00. Regarding current trading prices, LUNMF is priced at $9.12, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUNMF currently has a P/E ratio of 912.00, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LUNMF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUNMF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUNMF.