Lundin Gold Inc.
Lundin Gold Inc. LUGDF Peers
See (LUGDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUGDF | $52.72 | +7.35% | 12.6B | 23.55 | $2.22 | +3.01% |
| ZIJMF | $2.56 | -2.85% | 71.4B | 13.47 | $0.19 | +2.10% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +873.54% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $12.49 | +6.84% | 17.8B | 23.57 | $0.53 | +2.61% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CAHPF | $5.18 | +4.93% | 10.3B | 22.51 | $0.23 | +1.79% |
| OCANF | $14.09 | -1.54% | 10.1B | 35.41 | $0.41 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
LUGDF vs ZIJMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ZIJMF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OPYGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GFIOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NESRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while NESRF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NSTYY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NCMGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NCMGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CAHPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CAHPF trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OCANF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OCANF trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HGMCF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AULGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EDVMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while EDVMF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.61. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ZHAOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SBYSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SBYSF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ARGTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ARGTF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -260.57. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs COGDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, COGDF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while COGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas COGDF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to COGDF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to COGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DGMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ZIJMY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ZIJMY trades at $52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GSISF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while GSISF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 40.14. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PMNXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while PMNXF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GRLGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CRNLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CRNLF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs TORXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while TORXF trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KNTNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while KNTNF trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DPMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while DPMLF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RGRNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RGRNF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -310.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CELTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ELKMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ELKMF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WDOFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while WDOFF trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ORAAF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ORAAF trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs REDLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while REDLF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CXBMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WFRSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while WFRSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMLRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RMLRF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HCHDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while HCHDF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EOGSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while EOGSF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PAFRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OBNNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MWSNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MWSNF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -94.60. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MAUTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MAUTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KOZAY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AURQF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SNWGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 997.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SNWGF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DRDGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HCHDY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SVLKF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs BELGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 884.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while BELGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SGSVF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KRRGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 832M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -39.08. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RUPRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 823.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RUPRF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -176.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WTGRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RGDFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PDIYF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ASGOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 566.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ASGOF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MNSAF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 545.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MNSAF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ECRTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 523.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ECRTF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMGGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NVMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GUYGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while GUYGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -69.67. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OSKA Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OSKA trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PNGZF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PNGZF has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while PNGZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas PNGZF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PNGZF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to PNGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMLFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 472.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RMLFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ARNGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RSRBF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 463M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RSRBF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 79.98. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RIOFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while RIOFF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 107.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ORZCF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ORZCF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs LMGDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs THXPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while THXPF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs TPRXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ELEMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ELEMF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 68.68. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MNDJF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 333.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MNDJF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PROBF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 327.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while PROBF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ALKEF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 302.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ALKEF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MAKOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 300.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MAKOF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs FDMIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while FDMIF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs TGMGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while TGMGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to TGMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OGNRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OGNRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MGDPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KSKGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OSIIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ERRSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OMGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while OMGGF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GDRZF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 228.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while GDRZF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -20.20. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs STBMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs STPGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while STPGF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HSTXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while HSTXF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WRLGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while WRLGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AGXKF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs JAGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while JAGGF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SAAGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CNLMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs THSGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while THSGF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DCCNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CNMXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CNMVF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CNMVF has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while CNMVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas CNMVF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNMVF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CNMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SRBIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while SRBIF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs LECBF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EEYMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.72, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.55, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.