Lundin Gold Inc.
Lundin Gold Inc. LUGDF Peers
See (LUGDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUGDF | $52.59 | +0.94% | 12.7B | 23.69 | $2.22 | +2.34% |
| ZIJMF | $2.34 | +3.08% | 66.1B | 12.32 | $0.19 | +2.22% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $13.51 | -0.30% | 19.3B | 25.49 | $0.53 | +1.55% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.41% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.4B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUGDF vs ZIJMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ZIJMF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OPYGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GFIOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NESRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NESRF trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NSTYY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HCHDY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NCMGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NCMGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KOZAY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CAHPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CAHPF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HGMCF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ZHAOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AULGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EDVMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while EDVMF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -73.76. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SBYSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SBYSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ARGTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ARGTF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -282.86. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DGMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PMNXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while PMNXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OCANF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OCANF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ZIJMY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ZIJMY trades at $45.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs TORXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while TORXF trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KNTNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while KNTNF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ELKMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ELKMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CRNLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CRNLF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DPMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while DPMLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GRLGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GRLGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -19.69. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RGRNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RGRNF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -316.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GSISF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CELTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WDOFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while WDOFF trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HCHDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while HCHDF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMLRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RMLRF trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs REDLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CXBMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CXBMF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WFRSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while WFRSF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EOGSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ORAAF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ORAAF trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DRDGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OBNNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PAFRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MAUTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MAUTF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MWSNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MWSNF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -87.76. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AURQF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RUPRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 943.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RUPRF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -201.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SVLKF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 915.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RMGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SNWGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 889.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SNWGF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -42.54. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs BELGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 885.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while BELGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SGSVF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KRRGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PDIYF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 681.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while PDIYF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WTGRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RGDFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMGGY Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GUYGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GUYGF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -75.83. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ORZCF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 530.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ORZCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MNSAF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MNSAF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NVMLF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ASGOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ASGOF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ECRTF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ECRTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RSRBF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 474.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RSRBF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 82.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ARNGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RMLFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RMLFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs RIOFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while RIOFF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 89.75. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs LMGDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while LMGDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs PROBF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while PROBF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MNDJF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MNDJF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs KSKGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while KSKGF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs TPRXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs THXPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while THXPF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MAKOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 301.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MAKOF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ALKEF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 295.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ALKEF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs FDMIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while FDMIF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -33.95. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OGNRF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 288.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MGDPF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs STPGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while STPGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ELEMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ELEMF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OSIIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs OMGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while OMGGF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs ERRSF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs WRLGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while WRLGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs HSTXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while HSTXF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs JAGGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while JAGGF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -36.75. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs STBMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GDRZF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GDRZF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs THSGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while THSGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SRBIF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SRBIF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs AGXKF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SAAGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CNLMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DCCNF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs CNMXF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs MAIFF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while MAIFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs EEYMF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs GGAZF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while GGAZF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs FFMGF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while FFMGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs NVOOF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs DNGDF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while DNGDF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.
LUGDF vs SITKF Comparison
LUGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUGDF stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUGDF is priced at $52.59, while SITKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUGDF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.69, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -38.10. In terms of profitability, LUGDF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUGDF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUGDF.