Luff Enterprises Ltd.
Luff Enterprises Ltd. LUFF.CN Peers
See (LUFF.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUFF.CN | $0.01 | +100.00% | 4.02M | -0.56 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| CURA.CN | $5.22 | +9.21% | 4.07B | -6.07 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| BHC.TO | $6.50 | -0.46% | 2.40B | -38.24 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| VRNO.CN | $6.32 | +6.76% | 2.17B | -5.40 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| GTII.CN | $7.89 | -0.13% | 1.89B | 27.21 | $0.29 | N/A |
| TRUL.CN | $6.23 | +0.32% | 1.21B | -5.66 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| CRON.TO | $2.92 | -2.01% | 1.13B | 14.60 | $0.20 | N/A |
| CURA.TO | $1.20 | +4.35% | 905.65M | -2.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| TER.CN | $2.38 | -0.42% | 804.79M | -1.33 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| DHT-UN.TO | $12.75 | +1.11% | 717.96M | 318.75 | $0.04 | +7.60% |
Stock Comparison
LUFF.CN vs CURA.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CURA.CN has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CURA.CN trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CURA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CURA.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CURA.CN has daily volatility of 10.82.
LUFF.CN vs BHC.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BHC.TO has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BHC.TO trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BHC.TO's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BHC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BHC.TO has daily volatility of 3.20.
LUFF.CN vs VRNO.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, VRNO.CN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while VRNO.CN trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas VRNO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRNO.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VRNO.CN has daily volatility of 9.96.
LUFF.CN vs GTII.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, GTII.CN has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while GTII.CN trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GTII.CN's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTII.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GTII.CN has daily volatility of 4.34.
LUFF.CN vs TRUL.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TRUL.CN has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TRUL.CN trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TRUL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TRUL.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TRUL.CN has daily volatility of 8.75.
LUFF.CN vs CRON.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CRON.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CRON.TO trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRON.TO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRON.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CRON.TO has daily volatility of 3.77.
LUFF.CN vs CURA.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CURA.TO has a market cap of 905.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CURA.TO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CURA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CURA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CURA.TO has daily volatility of 6.72.
LUFF.CN vs TER.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TER.CN has a market cap of 804.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TER.CN trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TER.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TER.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TER.CN has daily volatility of 4.55.
LUFF.CN vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 717.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while DHT-UN.TO trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 318.75. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and DHT-UN.TO has daily volatility of 1.88.
LUFF.CN vs TLRY.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TLRY.TO has a market cap of 646.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TLRY.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TLRY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLRY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLRY.TO has daily volatility of 4.72.
LUFF.CN vs GUD.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, GUD.TO has a market cap of 574.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while GUD.TO trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GUD.TO's P/E ratio is 57.70. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GUD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GUD.TO has daily volatility of 1.72.
LUFF.CN vs DHT-U.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 464.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while DHT-U.TO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and DHT-U.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs WEED.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, WEED.TO has a market cap of 437.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while WEED.TO trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas WEED.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEED.TO's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WEED.TO has daily volatility of 7.13.
LUFF.CN vs ACB.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, ACB.TO has a market cap of 407.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while ACB.TO trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ACB.TO's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ACB.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ACB.TO has daily volatility of 6.23.
LUFF.CN vs VRNO.NE Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, VRNO.NE has a market cap of 341.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while VRNO.NE trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas VRNO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRNO.NE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VRNO.NE has daily volatility of 9.14.
LUFF.CN vs CL.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CL.CN has a market cap of 337.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CL.CN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CL.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CL.CN has daily volatility of 7.11.
LUFF.CN vs CPH.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CPH.TO has a market cap of 317.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CPH.TO trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CPH.TO's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CPH.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CPH.TO has daily volatility of 1.37.
LUFF.CN vs OGI.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, OGI.TO has a market cap of 251.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while OGI.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OGI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OGI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OGI.TO has daily volatility of 4.30.
LUFF.CN vs CCHW.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CCHW.CN has a market cap of 228.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CCHW.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CCHW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CCHW.CN's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CCHW.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs TH.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TH.TO has a market cap of 165.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TH.TO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TH.TO's P/E ratio is -36.10. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TH.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TH.TO has daily volatility of 3.31.
LUFF.CN vs TSND.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TSND.TO has a market cap of 160.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TSND.TO trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TSND.TO's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TSND.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TSND.TO has daily volatility of 9.01.
LUFF.CN vs HLS.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, HLS.TO has a market cap of 151.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while HLS.TO trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HLS.TO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HLS.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and HLS.TO has daily volatility of 1.68.
LUFF.CN vs BHSC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BHSC.CN has a market cap of 137.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BHSC.CN trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BHSC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BHSC.CN's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BHSC.CN has daily volatility of 1.25.
LUFF.CN vs GRIN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, GRIN.CN has a market cap of 136.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while GRIN.CN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GRIN.CN's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRIN.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GRIN.CN has daily volatility of 12.84.
LUFF.CN vs CRDL.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CRDL.TO has a market cap of 128.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CRDL.TO trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CRDL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRDL.TO's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CRDL.TO has daily volatility of 4.53.
LUFF.CN vs XLY.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, XLY.TO has a market cap of 111.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while XLY.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas XLY.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XLY.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and XLY.TO has daily volatility of 5.71.
LUFF.CN vs PLTH.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, PLTH.CN has a market cap of 107.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while PLTH.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLTH.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PLTH.CN has daily volatility of 13.14.
LUFF.CN vs GDNS.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, GDNS.CN has a market cap of 90.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while GDNS.CN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GDNS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GDNS.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GDNS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs JUSH.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, JUSH.CN has a market cap of 90.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while JUSH.CN trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas JUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JUSH.CN's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and JUSH.CN has daily volatility of 5.35.
LUFF.CN vs MDP.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MDP.TO has a market cap of 83.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MDP.TO trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MDP.TO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MDP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MDP.TO has daily volatility of 5.71.
LUFF.CN vs TGOD.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TGOD.CN has a market cap of 62.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TGOD.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TGOD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TGOD.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TGOD.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs BNXT.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BNXT.CN has a market cap of 61.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BNXT.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BNXT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BNXT.CN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BNXT.CN has daily volatility of 1.87.
LUFF.CN vs STEM.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, STEM.CN has a market cap of 53.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while STEM.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas STEM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STEM.CN's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and STEM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs INNO.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, INNO.CN has a market cap of 46.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while INNO.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas INNO.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INNO.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and INNO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs MRMD.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MRMD.CN has a market cap of 44.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MRMD.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MRMD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MRMD.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MRMD.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs HEXO.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, HEXO.TO has a market cap of 38.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while HEXO.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HEXO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HEXO.TO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and HEXO.TO has daily volatility of 5.65.
LUFF.CN vs AYR-A.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AYR-A.CN has a market cap of 38.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AYR-A.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AYR-A.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AYR-A.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AYR-A.CN has daily volatility of 7.52.
LUFF.CN vs CBST.NE Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CBST.NE has a market cap of 38.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CBST.NE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CBST.NE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CBST.NE's ROE of +10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CBST.NE has daily volatility of 11.76.
LUFF.CN vs CHM.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CHM.CN has a market cap of 37.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CHM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CHM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CHM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs IAN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, IAN.CN has a market cap of 33.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while IAN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas IAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IAN.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IAN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs LABS.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, LABS.TO has a market cap of 33.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while LABS.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LABS.TO's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LABS.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LABS.TO has daily volatility of 11.76.
LUFF.CN vs AVCN.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AVCN.TO has a market cap of 31.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AVCN.TO trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AVCN.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVCN.TO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AVCN.TO has daily volatility of 7.02.
LUFF.CN vs EPIC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, EPIC.CN has a market cap of 29.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while EPIC.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas EPIC.CN's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EPIC.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EPIC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs MMEN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MMEN.CN has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MMEN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MMEN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MMEN.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MMEN.CN has daily volatility of 28.57.
LUFF.CN vs VEXT.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, VEXT.CN has a market cap of 27.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while VEXT.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas VEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VEXT.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VEXT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs GWAY.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, GWAY.CN has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while GWAY.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GWAY.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GWAY.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GWAY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CXXI.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CXXI.CN has a market cap of 24.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CXXI.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CXXI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CXXI.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CXXI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs YOUR.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, YOUR.CN has a market cap of 22.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while YOUR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas YOUR.CN's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YOUR.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and YOUR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs VIN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, VIN.CN has a market cap of 20.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while VIN.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas VIN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIN.CN's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VIN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
LUFF.CN vs CWEB.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CWEB.TO has a market cap of 19.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CWEB.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CWEB.TO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CWEB.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CWEB.TO has daily volatility of 11.76.
LUFF.CN vs RWB.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, RWB.CN has a market cap of 18.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while RWB.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RWB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RWB.CN's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RWB.CN has daily volatility of 28.57.
LUFF.CN vs MRV.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MRV.TO has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MRV.TO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MRV.TO's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MRV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MRV.TO has daily volatility of 0.74.
LUFF.CN vs EXM.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, EXM.CN has a market cap of 15.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while EXM.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas EXM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXM.CN's ROE of -18.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EXM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CHAL.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CHAL.CN has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CHAL.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CHAL.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHAL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CHAL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs PWR.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, PWR.CN has a market cap of 14.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while PWR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PWR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PWR.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PWR.CN has daily volatility of 22.22.
LUFF.CN vs RIV.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, RIV.CN has a market cap of 13.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while RIV.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RIV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RIV.CN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RIV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs TRIP.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TRIP.CN has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TRIP.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TRIP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TRIP.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TRIP.CN has daily volatility of 18.18.
LUFF.CN vs ORI.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, ORI.CN has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while ORI.CN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ORI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ORI.CN's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ORI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs RVV.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, RVV.CN has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while RVV.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RVV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RVV.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RVV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CTX.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CTX.TO has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CTX.TO trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CTX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CTX.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CTX.TO has daily volatility of 3.77.
LUFF.CN vs CLC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CLC.CN has a market cap of 10.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CLC.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CLC.CN's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLC.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CLC.CN has daily volatility of 11.76.
LUFF.CN vs OILS.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, OILS.CN has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while OILS.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OILS.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OILS.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OILS.CN has daily volatility of 18.18.
LUFF.CN vs CNFA.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CNFA.CN has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CNFA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CNFA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNFA.CN's ROE of -7.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CNFA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs VIVO.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, VIVO.TO has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while VIVO.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas VIVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIVO.TO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VIVO.TO has daily volatility of 22.22.
LUFF.CN vs MVMD.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MVMD.CN has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MVMD.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MVMD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MVMD.CN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MVMD.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs AVNT.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AVNT.TO has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AVNT.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AVNT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVNT.TO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AVNT.TO has daily volatility of 6.06.
LUFF.CN vs AH.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AH.TO has a market cap of 8.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AH.TO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AH.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AH.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AH.TO has daily volatility of 28.57.
LUFF.CN vs AUSA.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AUSA.CN has a market cap of 7.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AUSA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AUSA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AUSA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AUSA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs STHZ.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, STHZ.CN has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while STHZ.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas STHZ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STHZ.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and STHZ.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs MOJO.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MOJO.CN has a market cap of 7.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MOJO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MOJO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MOJO.CN's ROE of -11.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MOJO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs SPR.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, SPR.CN has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while SPR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SPR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SPR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CLSH.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CLSH.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CLSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CLSH.CN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLSH.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CLSH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CDVA.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CDVA.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CDVA.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CDVA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CDVA.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CDVA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs IMCC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, IMCC.CN has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while IMCC.CN trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas IMCC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IMCC.CN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IMCC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs SE.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, SE.CN has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while SE.CN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SE.CN's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SE.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SE.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs MYCO.NE Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MYCO.NE has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MYCO.NE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MYCO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MYCO.NE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MYCO.NE has daily volatility of 15.38.
LUFF.CN vs SNN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, SNN.CN has a market cap of 6.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while SNN.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SNN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SNN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs WLLW.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, WLLW.TO has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while WLLW.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas WLLW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WLLW.TO's ROE of -21.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WLLW.TO has daily volatility of 13.33.
LUFF.CN vs BCBC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BCBC.CN has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BCBC.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BCBC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BCBC.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BCBC.CN has daily volatility of 28.57.
LUFF.CN vs AYUR.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AYUR.CN has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AYUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AYUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AYUR.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AYUR.CN has daily volatility of 18.18.
LUFF.CN vs AION.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AION.CN has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AION.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AION.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AION.CN's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AION.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs LOBE.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, LOBE.CN has a market cap of 4.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while LOBE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LOBE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LOBE.CN's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LOBE.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CANN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CANN.CN has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CANN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CANN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CANN.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CANN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs BHNG.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BHNG.CN has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BHNG.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BHNG.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BHNG.CN's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BHNG.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs FFNT.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, FFNT.CN has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while FFNT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FFNT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FFNT.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FFNT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs FH.NE Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, FH.NE has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while FH.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FH.NE's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FH.NE's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FH.NE has daily volatility of 40.00.
LUFF.CN vs BAMM.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, BAMM.CN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while BAMM.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BAMM.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BAMM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs RMC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, RMC.CN has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while RMC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RMC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RMC.CN's ROE of +8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RMC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs THC.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, THC.CN has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while THC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas THC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and THC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs NBUD.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, NBUD.CN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while NBUD.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas NBUD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NBUD.CN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NBUD.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs XBRA.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, XBRA.CN has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while XBRA.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas XBRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XBRA.CN's ROE of -20.92%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and XBRA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs MSVN.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, MSVN.CN has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while MSVN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MSVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSVN.CN's ROE of +19.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MSVN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs AREV.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, AREV.CN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while AREV.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AREV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AREV.CN's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AREV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs ASP.TO Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, ASP.TO has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while ASP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ASP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASP.TO's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ASP.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs CFT.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, CFT.CN has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while CFT.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CFT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CFT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs IPOT.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, IPOT.CN has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while IPOT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas IPOT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IPOT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IPOT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs PBF.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, PBF.CN has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while PBF.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PBF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PBF.CN's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PBF.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs TGIF.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, TGIF.CN has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while TGIF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TGIF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TGIF.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TGIF.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
LUFF.CN vs RAMM.CN Comparison
LUFF.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUFF.CN stands at 4.02M. In comparison, RAMM.CN has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LUFF.CN is priced at $0.01, while RAMM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUFF.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RAMM.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RAMM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.