Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.
Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. (LUDG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUDG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUDG | $0.06 | -11.66% | 9.5M | -5.91 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| RGLXF | $41.00 | +2.47% | 6.3B | 16.80 | $2.44 | +6.10% |
| FJTNF | $27.73 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -42.66 | -$0.65 | +1.24% |
| NPTVF | $21.77 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 17.27 | $1.26 | +1.24% |
| RGLXY | $3.47 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 13.88 | $0.25 | +8.13% |
| FJTNY | $11.60 | -0.17% | 5B | -36.25 | -$0.32 | +1.36% |
| ITVPF | $1.11 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 15.86 | $0.07 | +5.88% |
| ITVPY | $10.85 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 16.69 | $0.65 | +6.02% |
| SGBAF | $6.80 | +0.00% | 2.8B | -56.67 | -$0.12 | +8.20% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
LUDG vs RGLXF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while RGLXF trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and RGLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGLXF's competition here
LUDG vs FJTNF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while FJTNF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -42.66. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check FJTNF's competition here
LUDG vs NPTVF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check NPTVF's competition here
LUDG vs RGLXY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while RGLXY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to RGLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check RGLXY's competition here
LUDG vs FJTNY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while FJTNY trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and FJTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTNY's competition here
LUDG vs ITVPF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while ITVPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check ITVPF's competition here
LUDG vs ITVPY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while ITVPY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check ITVPY's competition here
LUDG vs SGBAF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while SGBAF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -56.67. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and SGBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGBAF's competition here
LUDG vs TKOBF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKOBF's competition here
LUDG vs TVFCF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVFCF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to TVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check TVFCF's competition here
LUDG vs PBSFY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while PBSFY trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check PBSFY's competition here
LUDG vs THDDY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while THDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check THDDY's competition here
LUDG vs TVAHF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVAHF trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to TVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check TVAHF's competition here
LUDG vs MTPVY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check MTPVY's competition here
LUDG vs PBSFF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check PBSFF's competition here
LUDG vs GETVF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVF's competition here
LUDG vs SKPJY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKPJY's competition here
LUDG vs STGYF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 504.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while STGYF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to STGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check STGYF's competition here
LUDG vs BECVY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while BECVY trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to BECVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check BECVY's competition here
LUDG vs TVBCY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVBCY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and TVBCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCY's competition here
LUDG vs TVBCF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCF's competition here
LUDG vs AZTEF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZTEF's competition here
LUDG vs TLDE Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLDE's competition here
LUDG vs TVAGF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check TVAGF's competition here
LUDG vs EMMS Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while EMMS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check EMMS's competition here
LUDG vs AOECF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AOECF's competition here
LUDG vs PEGX Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check PEGX's competition here
LUDG vs INCT Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check INCT's competition here
LUDG vs AITVF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AITVF's competition here
LUDG vs TVTV Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TVTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check TVTV's competition here
LUDG vs FHLD Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while FHLD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check FHLD's competition here
LUDG vs SBSAA Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while SBSAA trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check SBSAA's competition here
LUDG vs AUDAQ Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check AUDAQ's competition here
LUDG vs TFBN Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFBN's competition here
LUDG vs LPTV Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 482.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while LPTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check LPTV's competition here
LUDG vs PSRU Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSRU's competition here
LUDG vs MEMI Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check MEMI's competition here
LUDG vs FONU Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check FONU's competition here
LUDG vs TMGI Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 84.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while TMGI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check TMGI's competition here
LUDG vs WTKN Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUDG.Check WTKN's competition here
LUDG vs WNRC Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNRC's competition here
LUDG vs MNIZ Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 932. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while MNIZ trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNIZ's competition here
LUDG vs GETVY Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVY's competition here
LUDG vs MCTZF Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCTZF's competition here
LUDG vs ALLN Comparison August 2025
LUDG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUDG stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUDG is priced at $0.06, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUDG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.91, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUDG's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LUDG and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALLN's competition here