Luceco plc
Luceco plc LUCE.L Peers
See (LUCE.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCE.L | $154.00 | +2.67% | 246.93M | 17.11 | $0.09 | +3.25% |
| 0NX2.L | $27.51 | -0.48% | 58.65B | 12.23 | $2.25 | +1.58% |
| 0HF7.L | $178.82 | -0.26% | 41.29B | 39.92 | $4.48 | +0.64% |
| 0L2T.L | $26.10 | -4.04% | 7.85B | N/A | N/A | +0.46% |
| 0RQH.L | $42.40 | -1.40% | 7.48B | 15.20 | $2.79 | +3.31% |
| 0G9R.L | $165.20 | N/A | 1.46B | -103.64 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| SMS.L | $954.00 | +0.21% | 1.32B | 86.73 | $0.11 | +0.87% |
| 0REY.L | $159.98 | N/A | 990.00M | 43.93 | $3.64 | N/A |
| 0R1J.L | $18.11 | N/A | 832.91M | -18.71 | -$0.97 | N/A |
| VLX.L | $273.50 | -0.36% | 502.74M | 16.09 | $0.17 | +1.23% |
Stock Comparison
LUCE.L vs 0NX2.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0NX2.L has a market cap of 58.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0NX2.L trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0NX2.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0NX2.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0NX2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0HF7.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0HF7.L has a market cap of 41.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0HF7.L trades at $178.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0HF7.L's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HF7.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0HF7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0L2T.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0L2T.L has a market cap of 7.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0L2T.L trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0L2T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0L2T.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0L2T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0RQH.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0RQH.L has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0RQH.L trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0RQH.L's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0RQH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0RQH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0G9R.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0G9R.L has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0G9R.L trades at $165.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0G9R.L's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0G9R.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0G9R.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs SMS.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, SMS.L has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while SMS.L trades at $954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas SMS.L's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to SMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0REY.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0REY.L has a market cap of 990.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0REY.L trades at $159.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0REY.L's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0REY.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0REY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0R1J.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0R1J.L has a market cap of 832.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0R1J.L trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0R1J.L's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R1J.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0R1J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs VLX.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, VLX.L has a market cap of 502.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while VLX.L trades at $273.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas VLX.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to VLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs TFW.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, TFW.L has a market cap of 346.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while TFW.L trades at $297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas TFW.L's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TFW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to TFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0QJY.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0QJY.L has a market cap of 314.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0QJY.L trades at $498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0QJY.L's P/E ratio is -185.34. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QJY.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0QJY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0QPV.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0QPV.L has a market cap of 294.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0QPV.L trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0QPV.L's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QPV.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0QPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs XPP.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, XPP.L has a market cap of 218.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while XPP.L trades at $784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas XPP.L's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to XPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0MJH.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0MJH.L has a market cap of 214.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0MJH.L trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0MJH.L's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0MJH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0MJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0QP6.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0QP6.L has a market cap of 205.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0QP6.L trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0QP6.L's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QP6.L's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0QP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs SUP.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, SUP.L has a market cap of 198.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while SUP.L trades at $169.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas SUP.L's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUP.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to SUP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0A60.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0A60.L has a market cap of 161.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0A60.L trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0A60.L's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0A60.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0A60.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0QL5.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0QL5.L has a market cap of 152.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0QL5.L trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0QL5.L's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0QL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs CWR.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, CWR.L has a market cap of 131.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while CWR.L trades at $68.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas CWR.L's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWR.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to CWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs AFC.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, AFC.L has a market cap of 85.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while AFC.L trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas AFC.L's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFC.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to AFC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0O27.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0O27.L has a market cap of 63.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0O27.L trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0O27.L's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0O27.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to 0O27.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs DWHA.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, DWHA.L has a market cap of 60.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while DWHA.L trades at $575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas DWHA.L's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DWHA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to DWHA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs DWHT.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, DWHT.L has a market cap of 58.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while DWHT.L trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas DWHT.L's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DWHT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to DWHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs IKA.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, IKA.L has a market cap of 55.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while IKA.L trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas IKA.L's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IKA.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to IKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs 0GYQ.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, 0GYQ.L has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while 0GYQ.L trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas 0GYQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0GYQ.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to 0GYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs DIA.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, DIA.L has a market cap of 43.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while DIA.L trades at $109.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas DIA.L's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIA.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to DIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs GELN.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, GELN.L has a market cap of 29.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while GELN.L trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas GELN.L's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GELN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to GELN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs EAAS.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, EAAS.L has a market cap of 20.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while EAAS.L trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas EAAS.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EAAS.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to EAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs LPA.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, LPA.L has a market cap of 6.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while LPA.L trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas LPA.L's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to LPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs PPS.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, PPS.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while PPS.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas PPS.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to PPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs DGI.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, DGI.L has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while DGI.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas DGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DGI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is less volatile compared to DGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.
LUCE.L vs AMTE.L Comparison
LUCE.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCE.L stands at 246.93M. In comparison, AMTE.L has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCE.L is priced at $154.00, while AMTE.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.11, whereas AMTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LUCE.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMTE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCE.L is more volatile compared to AMTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCE.L.