Larsen & Toubro Limited

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ACSAY trades at $13.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BOUYY trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while VCISF trades at $144.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while VCISY trades at $35.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while WSPOF trades at $199.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CRWOF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ACSAF trades at $66.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ACSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BOUYF trades at $44.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while HOCFF trades at $189.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to HOCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while EFGSY trades at $27.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to EFGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KAJMF trades at $25.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SNCAF trades at $68.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KAJMY trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while OBYCF trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while STBBF trades at $92.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while TISCY trades at $13.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SKBSY trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ACXIF trades at $171.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SKSBF trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SKSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CCOHF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to AVHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BCKIY trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BCKIF trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SHMUY trades at $43.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while TISCF trades at $37.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to TISCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ARCAY trades at $50.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to RBWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ARCVF trades at $46.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PUODY trades at $226.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while IMPJY trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while NWSGY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while MLLUY trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BFLBF trades at $90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BAFBF trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BAFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BFLBY trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BFLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while NWSZF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SENGF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to PYYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while OPMXF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while JGCCY trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -795.50. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to JGCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to PNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to AGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while TNISY trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while TNISF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KBAGF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KLRGF trades at $19.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BIRDF trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BIRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BADFF trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BADFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KIERF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to CKOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to MOPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while AEGXF trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while YITYY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to YITYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to RNWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 559M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SLAAF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to CHYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ELWSF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CSGQF trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CSGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BRAGF trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while DBMG trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to DBMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BRANF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BRANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while BILBF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to BILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to KNNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while APEUF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 62.34. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while MURSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to MURSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while MRCR trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to LOUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while GRHI trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while COLDF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while CIPI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to ETWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while SODE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is more volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while PMDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMDP's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 67B. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $48.68, while RELT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELT's ROE of +19.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.