Larsen & Toubro Limited

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 80.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ACSAY trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 79.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while VCISY trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 79.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BOUYY trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 79.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while VCISF trades at $141.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 48.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PWR trades at $325.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 24.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WSPOF trades at $186.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 19.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while EME trades at $439.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 18.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CRWOF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ACSAF trades at $63.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and ACSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 15.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FIX trades at $434.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 14.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while J trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas J's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ACM trades at $104.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 13.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BOUYF trades at $36.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 13.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while HOCFF trades at $175.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and HOCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and EFGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while EFGSY trades at $27.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 12.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while APG trades at $44.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 72.39. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 11.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MTZ trades at $148.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while OBYCF trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KAJMY trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while STN trades at $94.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while STBBF trades at $92.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and STBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KAJMF trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TTEK trades at $35.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TISCY trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SNCAF trades at $52.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and SNCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SKBSY trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BLD trades at $295.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and AVHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ACXIF trades at $149.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SKSBF trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and SKSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KBR trades at $55.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TISCF trades at $37.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and TISCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CCOHF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FLR trades at $35.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BCKIY trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BCKIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BCKIF trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while DY trades at $188.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while STRL trades at $177.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ROAD trades at $95.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.32. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while IESC trades at $245.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SHMUY trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ARCAY trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PUODY trades at $223.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and RBWNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ARCVF trades at $46.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while NWSGY trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while IMPJY trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while NWSZF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PRIM trades at $68.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while GVA trades at $82.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BAFBF trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BAFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BFLBY trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BFLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BFLBF trades at $83.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while OPMXF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 96.06. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SENGF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and PYYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ECG trades at $48.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MYRG trades at $155.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 72.05. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AGX trades at $170.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while JGCCY trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and JGCCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TPC trades at $32.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and PNOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and AGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TNISY trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while LMB trades at $122.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TNISF trades at $17.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KLRGF trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while NVEE trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KBAGF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and KBAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 984.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BADFF trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BADFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 978.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BIRDF trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BIRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and CKOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 933.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and MOPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 825.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ELWSF trades at $62.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -33.66. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 821.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AEGXF trades at $13.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 786.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KIERF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 720.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while GLDD trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 700.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AMRC trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while YITYY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and YITYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 614.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WLDN trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and RNWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 558.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 554.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SLAAF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and CHYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 431.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BWMN trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 146.29. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 363.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BBCP trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 343.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MTRX trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 304.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ORN trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 77.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 279.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BRAGF trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 258.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CSGQF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and CSGQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 238.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while RITR trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AENZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 170.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SLND trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while DBMG trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and DBMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 157.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ESOA trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 139.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while JUNE trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -134.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 101.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MIMI trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 146.83. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 94.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while VATE trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 91.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BRANF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BRANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 86.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BLNK trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 61.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SHIM trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHIM's ROE of -71.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and KNNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MSW trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 46.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AGFY trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -5.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 40.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ONEG trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONEG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 37.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while APEUF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and APEUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 34.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while BILBF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and BILBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MLLUY trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MURSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and MURSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 21.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FGL trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 15.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MRCR trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and MRCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 13.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WXM trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 12.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PGHL trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and LOUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FBGL trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while COLDF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SUNE trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while GRHI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WLGS trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and ETWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CIPI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SODE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PMDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while RELT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELT's ROE of +8.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, EFTI has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while EFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas EFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and EFTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, PRKV has a market cap of 662925.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while PRKV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas PRKV's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRKV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and PRKV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, RIII has a market cap of 421413.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while RIII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas RIII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIII's ROE of +236.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and RIII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, JNSH has a market cap of 220343.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while JNSH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas JNSH's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JNSH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to JNSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, CCGM has a market cap of 200400.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while CCGM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas CCGM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to CCGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, GNSPF has a market cap of 90093.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while GNSPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas GNSPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNSPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and GNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, DLOC has a market cap of 73377.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while DLOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas DLOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLOC's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and DLOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, FRCN has a market cap of 59926.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while FRCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas FRCN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRCN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and FRCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, VICT has a market cap of 23086.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while VICT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas VICT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VICT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to VICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WAXS has a market cap of 7339.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WAXS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WAXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WAXS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WAXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ARME has a market cap of 4517.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ARME trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ARME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARME's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and ARME have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, WLMSQ has a market cap of 2721.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while WLMSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas WLMSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLMSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to WLMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, NSMG has a market cap of 2467.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while NSMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas NSMG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to NSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, TSNI has a market cap of 1458.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while TSNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas TSNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and TSNI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, AMLC has a market cap of 433.00. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while AMLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas AMLC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF and AMLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SKK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SKK trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LTOUF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SKK has daily volatility of N/A.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, SKBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while SKBL trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LTOUF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SKBL has daily volatility of N/A.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, IEA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, HIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, MCDIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while MCDIF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas MCDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCDIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to MCDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.

LTOUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LTOUF stands at 50.88B. In comparison, ATCX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LTOUF is priced at $37.00, while ATCX trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LTOUF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.83, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, LTOUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTOUF is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTOUF.