LifeQuest World Corporation
LifeQuest World Corporation LQWC Peers
See (LQWC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQWC | $0.01 | -3.40% | 471806.00 | -0.26 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| KTWIY | $71.72 | -0.33% | 4.03B | 29.27 | $2.45 | N/A |
| KTWIF | $34.67 | N/A | 3.89B | 28.42 | $1.22 | +1.80% |
| MMNNF | $16.05 | +25.88% | 2.93B | 29.18 | $0.55 | +0.45% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +25.16% | 2.44B | 16.78 | $3.16 | +2.09% |
| UMICF | $9.40 | -4.13% | 2.26B | -1.37 | -$6.88 | +5.69% |
| UMICY | $2.34 | +1.30% | 2.25B | -1.36 | -$1.72 | +5.34% |
| CCVTF | $0.94 | N/A | 1.68B | 5.85 | $0.16 | +4.13% |
| HIZOF | $6.59 | -0.90% | 1.11B | 7.32 | $0.90 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | N/A | 701.45M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
LQWC vs KTWIY Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while KTWIY trades at $71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and KTWIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs KTWIF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while KTWIF trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs MMNNF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MMNNF trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and MMNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ORGJF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs UMICF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while UMICF trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and UMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs UMICY Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while UMICY trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs CCVTF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while CCVTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs HIZOF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs TKUMF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and TKUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs MTWTF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and MTWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs PVARF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while PVARF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs GRPRF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 311.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GRPRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and GRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs AKCCF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 171.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while AKCCF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs ACTHF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs MEEC Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs SSHPF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs EMFGF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 39.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs SREMF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 33.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SREMF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs YEWTF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs SCAXF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs PGTK Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while PGTK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs BIRMF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while BIRMF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs TMGEF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 13.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while TMGEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and TMGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs INTWF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 12.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and INTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs GRNWF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 9.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GRNWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and GRNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs QUTIF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while QUTIF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs DNDDF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs BNET Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 5.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while BNET trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs DCTIF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 5.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while DCTIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs QWTR Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while QWTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs AETLF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs DRFS Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs GOGR Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GOGR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs KNOS Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs MGON Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs ENPRF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs DOCKF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 2.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs EAWD Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs OWUV Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and OWUV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs RAKR Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 629541.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while RAKR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and RAKR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ATMFF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 527959.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs COSLF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 483056.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and COSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ATGVF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 462848.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs TGTMF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 458071.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs SFBE Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427149.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs GWTR Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 343470.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs GMEV Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270544.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs TNKE Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265933.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and TNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs WTII Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 107824.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs XLPI Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 86265.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs PCTL Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80560.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ESFS Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75086.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs MSBN Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53168.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs GLEC Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 49990.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs AKMYF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35252.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs EESH Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 27699.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while EESH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and EESH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ETII Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26205.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs WTNW Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24267.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs SINX Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 18953.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs GCHK Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16136.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs UVFT Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13416.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs PURA Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11414.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs SMVS Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8523.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs GRCO Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8291.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs SYEV Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 7992.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs CGYV Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6210.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and CGYV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs ROBXF Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5605.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs EMHI Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4017.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs RENO Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs EAUI Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2858.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs MPML Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC and MPML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LQWC vs HTHL Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.
LQWC vs FQCC Comparison
LQWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQWC stands at 471806.00. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, LQWC is priced at $0.01, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQWC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.26, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQWC's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LQWC is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQWC.