DEAG Deutsche Entertainment AG
DEAG Deutsche Entertainment AG LOUD.DE Peers
See (LOUD.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOUD.DE | $3.16 | N/A | 68.22M | 9.49 | $0.33 | N/A |
| NFC.DE | $1,047.80 | -0.66% | 445.91B | 55.85 | $18.76 | N/A |
| WDP.DE | $96.86 | -1.57% | 174.13B | 22.32 | $4.34 | +0.81% |
| WDP.F | $96.58 | -2.44% | 173.63B | 22.25 | $4.34 | +0.84% |
| MGG.DE | $37.48 | +13.99% | 11.39B | 13.78 | $2.72 | N/A |
| EVD.DE | $106.60 | +0.95% | 10.23B | 34.39 | $3.10 | +1.56% |
| R35.F | $60.14 | -2.59% | 8.82B | -92.52 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| VVU.DE | $2.87 | -0.97% | 2.85B | -15.95 | -$0.18 | +1.37% |
| BVB.DE | $3.87 | +0.13% | 426.61M | 2.58 | $1.50 | +1.55% |
| EDL.DE | $4.04 | N/A | 85.95M | 7.77 | $0.52 | +7.43% |
Stock Comparison
LOUD.DE vs NFC.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, NFC.DE has a market cap of 445.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while NFC.DE trades at $1,047.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas NFC.DE's P/E ratio is 55.85. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to NFC.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to NFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs WDP.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 174.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while WDP.DE trades at $96.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs WDP.F Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, WDP.F has a market cap of 173.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while WDP.F trades at $96.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas WDP.F's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to WDP.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to WDP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs MGG.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, MGG.DE has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while MGG.DE trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MGG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to MGG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to MGG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs EVD.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, EVD.DE has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while EVD.DE trades at $106.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas EVD.DE's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EVD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to EVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs R35.F Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, R35.F has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while R35.F trades at $60.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas R35.F's P/E ratio is -92.52. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to R35.F's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to R35.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs VVU.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, VVU.DE has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while VVU.DE trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas VVU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VVU.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to VVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs BVB.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, BVB.DE has a market cap of 426.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while BVB.DE trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BVB.DE's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to BVB.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to BVB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs EDL.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, EDL.DE has a market cap of 85.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while EDL.DE trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas EDL.DE's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDL.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to EDL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs HLG.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 65.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while HLG.DE trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs CLIQ.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, CLIQ.DE has a market cap of 34.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while CLIQ.DE trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas CLIQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to CLIQ.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to CLIQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs PAL.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, PAL.DE has a market cap of 29.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while PAL.DE trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PAL.DE's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to PAL.DE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to PAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs SPM.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, SPM.DE has a market cap of 12.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while SPM.DE trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas SPM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPM.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is more volatile compared to SPM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs ITN.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, ITN.DE has a market cap of 9.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while ITN.DE trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas ITN.DE's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to ITN.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to ITN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs ERO1.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, ERO1.DE has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while ERO1.DE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas ERO1.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to ERO1.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to ERO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs WIG1.DE Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, WIG1.DE has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while WIG1.DE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas WIG1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to WIG1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOUD.DE is less volatile compared to WIG1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOUD.DE.
LOUD.DE vs IQ50.F Comparison
LOUD.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOUD.DE stands at 68.22M. In comparison, IQ50.F has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, LOUD.DE is priced at $3.16, while IQ50.F trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOUD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas IQ50.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOUD.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQ50.F's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LOUD.DE has daily volatility of 1.91 and IQ50.F has daily volatility of N/A.