Lords Group Trading PLC
Lords Group Trading PLC (LORD.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LORD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LORD.L | £45.50 | +3.41% | 73.1M | -44.00 | -£0.01 | +1.91% |
| 0IKW.L | £46.50 | -0.16% | 53.3B | 27.32 | £1.70 | +1.84% |
| 0IZI.L | £1,043.80 | -0.45% | 50.6B | 47.01 | £22.42 | +0.80% |
| FERG.L | £16,930.00 | +0.24% | 33.8B | 28.53 | £6.00 | +1.21% |
| 0QRA.L | £98.53 | +0.25% | 18.7B | 7.26 | £13.56 | +51.33% |
| DPLM.L | £5,380.00 | +1.70% | 7.2B | 43.02 | £1.24 | +1.13% |
| 0RTK.L | £105.40 | -3.48% | 5.5B | 12.96 | £8.50 | +1.88% |
| RS1.L | £559.00 | -1.93% | 2.7B | 17.14 | £0.33 | +3.96% |
| 0RNT.L | £91.40 | -4.09% | 2.6B | 10.09 | £9.30 | +3.27% |
| GFTU.L | £890.00 | -0.10% | 1.7B | 12.46 | £0.71 | +4.18% |
Stock Comparison
LORD.L vs 0IKW.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0IKW.L has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0IKW.L trades at £46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0IKW.L's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0IKW.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0IKW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0IKW.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0IZI.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0IZI.L has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0IZI.L trades at £1,043.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0IZI.L's P/E ratio is 47.01. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0IZI.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0IZI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0IZI.L's competition here
LORD.L vs FERG.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, FERG.L has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while FERG.L trades at £16,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas FERG.L's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FERG.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to FERG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check FERG.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0QRA.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0QRA.L has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0QRA.L trades at £98.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0QRA.L's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0QRA.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0QRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0QRA.L's competition here
LORD.L vs DPLM.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, DPLM.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while DPLM.L trades at £5,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas DPLM.L's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DPLM.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to DPLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check DPLM.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0RTK.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0RTK.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0RTK.L trades at £105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0RTK.L's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0RTK.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0RTK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0RTK.L's competition here
LORD.L vs RS1.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, RS1.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while RS1.L trades at £559.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas RS1.L's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RS1.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to RS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check RS1.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0RNT.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0RNT.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0RNT.L trades at £91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0RNT.L's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0RNT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0RNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0RNT.L's competition here
LORD.L vs GFTU.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, GFTU.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while GFTU.L trades at £890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas GFTU.L's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GFTU.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to GFTU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check GFTU.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0K9J.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0K9J.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0K9J.L trades at £15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0K9J.L's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0K9J.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0K9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0K9J.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0AH7.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0AH7.L has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0AH7.L trades at £9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0AH7.L's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0AH7.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0AH7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0AH7.L's competition here
LORD.L vs LTHP.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, LTHP.L has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while LTHP.L trades at £122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas LTHP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTHP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to LTHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check LTHP.L's competition here
LORD.L vs BRCK.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, BRCK.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while BRCK.L trades at £62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas BRCK.L's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRCK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to BRCK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check BRCK.L's competition here
LORD.L vs SHI.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, SHI.L has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while SHI.L trades at £14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas SHI.L's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is less volatile compared to SHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check SHI.L's competition here
LORD.L vs FLO.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, FLO.L has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while FLO.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas FLO.L's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLO.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is less volatile compared to FLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check FLO.L's competition here
LORD.L vs BMTO.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, BMTO.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while BMTO.L trades at £1,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas BMTO.L's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BMTO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to BMTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check BMTO.L's competition here
LORD.L vs BMT.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, BMT.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while BMT.L trades at £900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas BMT.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BMT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is less volatile compared to BMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check BMT.L's competition here
LORD.L vs SLNG.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, SLNG.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while SLNG.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas SLNG.L's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLNG.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to SLNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check SLNG.L's competition here
LORD.L vs 0RR3.L Comparison July 2025
LORD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LORD.L stands at 73.1M. In comparison, 0RR3.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LORD.L is priced at £45.50, while 0RR3.L trades at £143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LORD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -44.00, whereas 0RR3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LORD.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0RR3.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LORD.L is more volatile compared to 0RR3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LORD.L.Check 0RR3.L's competition here