LondonMetric Property Plc
LondonMetric Property Plc LNSPF Peers
See (LNSPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNSPF | $2.71 | -0.37% | 5.6B | 11.78 | $0.23 | +4.26% |
| GMGSF | $20.23 | -2.21% | 44.1B | 65.26 | $0.31 | +0.95% |
| NIPPF | $4,603.29 | N/A | 11.6B | 162.32 | $28.36 | +0.67% |
| STKAF | $3.58 | +1.42% | 8.6B | 29.83 | $0.12 | +4.47% |
| MRPRF | $12.50 | N/A | 7B | 19.53 | $0.64 | +2.73% |
| LDSCY | $8.52 | +1.91% | 6.3B | 11.83 | $0.72 | +6.20% |
| GSEFF | $55.40 | N/A | 6.1B | 78.03 | $0.71 | +6.33% |
| GPTGF | $3.20 | +7.38% | 6.1B | -45.71 | -$0.07 | +4.82% |
| LSGOF | $8.23 | -3.32% | 6.1B | 11.43 | $0.72 | +6.41% |
| UTGPF | $11.13 | -4.70% | 5.4B | 8.56 | $1.30 | +4.44% |
Stock Comparison
LNSPF vs GMGSF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GMGSF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while GMGSF trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas GMGSF's P/E ratio is 65.26. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMGSF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and GMGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs NIPPF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NIPPF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while NIPPF trades at $4,603.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas NIPPF's P/E ratio is 162.32. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NIPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and NIPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs STKAF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STKAF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while STKAF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas STKAF's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and STKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs MRPRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MRPRF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while MRPRF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas MRPRF's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and MRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs LDSCY Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LDSCY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while LDSCY trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas LDSCY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LDSCY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to LDSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs GSEFF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GSEFF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while GSEFF trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas GSEFF's P/E ratio is 78.03. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSEFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and GSEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs GPTGF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GPTGF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while GPTGF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas GPTGF's P/E ratio is -45.71. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPTGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and GPTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs LSGOF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LSGOF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while LSGOF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas LSGOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSGOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and LSGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs UTGPF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UTGPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while UTGPF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas UTGPF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UTGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and UTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs FBASF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FBASF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while FBASF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas FBASF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FBASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to FBASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs BTLCY Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BTLCY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while BTLCY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas BTLCY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTLCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to BTLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs BRLAF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BRLAF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while BRLAF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas BRLAF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and BRLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs CTOUF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CTOUF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CTOUF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CTOUF's P/E ratio is 267.38. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTOUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and CTOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs DEXSF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DEXSF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while DEXSF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas DEXSF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEXSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to DEXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs JPRRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JPRRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while JPRRF trades at $3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas JPRRF's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and JPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs UUICF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UUICF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while UUICF trades at $998.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas UUICF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UUICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to UUICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs SURVF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SURVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while SURVF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas SURVF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SURVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to SURVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs ATTRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ATTRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while ATTRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas ATTRF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and ATTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs CFMOF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CFMOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CFMOF trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CFMOF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFMOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and CFMOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs GWWTF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GWWTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while GWWTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas GWWTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and GWWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs HRUFF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HRUFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while HRUFF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas HRUFF's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HRUFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to HRUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs CROMF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CROMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CROMF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CROMF's P/E ratio is -365.00. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CROMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and CROMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs CDMGF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CDMGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CDMGF trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CDMGF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDMGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and CDMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs SHABF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHABF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while SHABF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas SHABF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHABF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and SHABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs XIORF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XIORF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while XIORF trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas XIORF's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XIORF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to XIORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs CHLWF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CHLWF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CHLWF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CHLWF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHLWF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to CHLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs TKURF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TKURF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while TKURF trades at $1,176.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas TKURF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKURF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to TKURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs RETDF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RETDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while RETDF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas RETDF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RETDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and RETDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs AOTUF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AOTUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while AOTUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas AOTUF's P/E ratio is -66.06. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AOTUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and AOTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs IGPYF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IGPYF has a market cap of 865.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while IGPYF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas IGPYF's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGPYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to IGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs KWIPF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KWIPF has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while KWIPF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas KWIPF's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KWIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and KWIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs LAREF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LAREF has a market cap of 705.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while LAREF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas LAREF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAREF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to LAREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs SHTRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHTRF has a market cap of 660.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while SHTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas SHTRF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and SHTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs ATVXF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ATVXF has a market cap of 658M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while ATVXF trades at $915.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas ATVXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATVXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to ATVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs YUXXF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, YUXXF has a market cap of 650.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while YUXXF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas YUXXF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YUXXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to YUXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs ARESF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ARESF has a market cap of 544.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while ARESF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas ARESF's P/E ratio is -19.12. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARESF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and ARESF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs IMMQF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IMMQF has a market cap of 381.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while IMMQF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas IMMQF's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMMQF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and IMMQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs MGRUF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MGRUF has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while MGRUF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas MGRUF's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and MGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs PREUF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PREUF has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while PREUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas PREUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PREUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and PREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs BTBIF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BTBIF has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while BTBIF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas BTBIF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and BTBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs FRMUF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FRMUF has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while FRMUF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas FRMUF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRMUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to FRMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs FREVS Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FREVS has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while FREVS trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas FREVS's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FREVS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and FREVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs CNNRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CNNRF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while CNNRF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas CNNRF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to CNNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs HHDS Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HHDS has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while HHDS trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas HHDS's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHDS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and HHDS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs DDHRF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DDHRF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while DDHRF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas DDHRF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDHRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and DDHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs PDNLB Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PDNLB has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while PDNLB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas PDNLB's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDNLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to PDNLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs GADS Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GADS has a market cap of 36.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while GADS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas GADS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GADS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and GADS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNSPF vs AQQSQ Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AQQSQ has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while AQQSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas AQQSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQQSQ's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF is less volatile compared to AQQSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNSPF.
LNSPF vs ABPPF Comparison
LNSPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNSPF stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ABPPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNSPF is priced at $2.71, while ABPPF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.78, whereas ABPPF's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, LNSPF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABPPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNSPF and ABPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).