LianDi Clean Technology, Inc.
LianDi Clean Technology, Inc. (LNDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNDT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 3.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TNRSF | $19.01 | +0.00% | 20.4B | 10.28 | $1.85 | +4.37% |
| THNPY | $43.84 | +0.67% | 7.7B | 17.40 | $2.52 | +2.14% |
| THNPF | $43.65 | +5.79% | 7.6B | 17.46 | $2.50 | +2.21% |
| GZPZY | $38.00 | -1.78% | 7B | 17.12 | $2.22 | +4.32% |
| CHOLF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 8.00 | $0.10 | +4.03% |
| SUBCY | $19.04 | -1.98% | 5.7B | 29.75 | $0.64 | +4.54% |
| ACGYF | $18.60 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 29.06 | $0.64 | +4.83% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +5.60% |
| SAPMF | $2.70 | +1.89% | 5.3B | 14.21 | $0.19 | +7.09% |
Stock Comparison
LNDT vs TNRSF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TNRSF trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check TNRSF's competition here
LNDT vs THNPY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while THNPY trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check THNPY's competition here
LNDT vs THNPF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while THNPF trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and THNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THNPF's competition here
LNDT vs GZPZY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while GZPZY trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and GZPZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZPZY's competition here
LNDT vs CHOLF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CHOLF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CHOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHOLF's competition here
LNDT vs SUBCY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SUBCY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SUBCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUBCY's competition here
LNDT vs ACGYF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ACGYF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check ACGYF's competition here
LNDT vs GZPZF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and GZPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZPZF's competition here
LNDT vs SAPMF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SAPMF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SAPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAPMF's competition here
LNDT vs WYGPY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while WYGPY trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and WYGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WYGPY's competition here
LNDT vs WYGPF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while WYGPF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and WYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WYGPF's competition here
LNDT vs SBFFF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SBFFF trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SBFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBFFF's competition here
LNDT vs SBFFY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SBFFY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SBFFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBFFY's competition here
LNDT vs TRRVF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TRRVF trades at $122.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check TRRVF's competition here
LNDT vs PRSEF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of +11.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PRSEF's competition here
LNDT vs CIMEF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CIMEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIMEF's competition here
LNDT vs TGSNF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TGSNF trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and TGSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGSNF's competition here
LNDT vs AKRYY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while AKRYY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and AKRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKRYY's competition here
LNDT vs AKRTF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and AKRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKRTF's competition here
LNDT vs MDIKF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and MDIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDIKF's competition here
LNDT vs CESDF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CESDF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CESDF's competition here
LNDT vs PGEJF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGEJF's competition here
LNDT vs SAWLF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SAWLF's competition here
LNDT vs TOLWF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 729.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TOLWF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check TOLWF's competition here
LNDT vs HNTIF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while HNTIF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check HNTIF's competition here
LNDT vs HNTIY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while HNTIY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and HNTIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNTIY's competition here
LNDT vs ATONF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ATONF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and ATONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATONF's competition here
LNDT vs PSYTF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 661.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PSYTF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PSYTF's competition here
LNDT vs SHANF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SHANF's competition here
LNDT vs SBOEF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SBOEF's competition here
LNDT vs ATONY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check ATONY's competition here
LNDT vs AKKVF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check AKKVF's competition here
LNDT vs CGGYY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CGGYY's competition here
LNDT vs TOTZF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TOTZF trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and TOTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOTZF's competition here
LNDT vs SNVVF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SNVVF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNVVF's competition here
LNDT vs CFWFF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 237.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CFWFF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CFWFF's competition here
LNDT vs DDHLF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DDHLF's competition here
LNDT vs BLYFF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLYFF's competition here
LNDT vs JUTOY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while JUTOY trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check JUTOY's competition here
LNDT vs PDER Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PDER trades at $290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PDER's competition here
LNDT vs PKDC Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKDC's competition here
LNDT vs WFTSF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check WFTSF's competition here
LNDT vs PLSDF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PLSDF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PLSDF's competition here
LNDT vs SCEYF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SCEYF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SCEYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCEYF's competition here
LNDT vs QSEP Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while QSEP trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check QSEP's competition here
LNDT vs POFCY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check POFCY's competition here
LNDT vs ETOLF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ETOLF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 57.15. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check ETOLF's competition here
LNDT vs MCCRF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while MCCRF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check MCCRF's competition here
LNDT vs NSFDF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while NSFDF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -62.71. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check NSFDF's competition here
LNDT vs CAWLF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAWLF's competition here
LNDT vs EEYUF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check EEYUF's competition here
LNDT vs POFCF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check POFCF's competition here
LNDT vs GWTI Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and GWTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWTI's competition here
LNDT vs QDRSF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QDRSF's competition here
LNDT vs BWTX Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check BWTX's competition here
LNDT vs KLNG Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while KLNG trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check KLNG's competition here
LNDT vs WEIIF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEIIF's competition here
LNDT vs FOYJ Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check FOYJ's competition here
LNDT vs ENGT Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ENGT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check ENGT's competition here
LNDT vs HGHAF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while HGHAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and HGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGHAF's competition here
LNDT vs CGPVF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CGPVF's competition here
LNDT vs BRYFF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while BRYFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check BRYFF's competition here
LNDT vs TAGP Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TAGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and TAGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAGP's competition here
LNDT vs OXFCF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OXFCF's competition here
LNDT vs CTNR Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CTNR trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CTNR's competition here
LNDT vs TXLZF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check TXLZF's competition here
LNDT vs NWPIF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check NWPIF's competition here
LNDT vs GLFH Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check GLFH's competition here
LNDT vs SKPO Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 690.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SKPO's competition here
LNDT vs IRIG Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check IRIG's competition here
LNDT vs SMGI Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 338.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SMGI's competition here
LNDT vs FSEI Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check FSEI's competition here
LNDT vs SSOF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSOF's competition here
LNDT vs IESCF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IESCF's competition here
LNDT vs PKDCW Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PKDCW's competition here
LNDT vs GPTC Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check GPTC's competition here
LNDT vs WWNG Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check WWNG's competition here
LNDT vs CPYJ Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CPYJ's competition here
LNDT vs SGUJ Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and SGUJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGUJ's competition here
LNDT vs TEGR Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEGR's competition here
LNDT vs CSSV Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CSSV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSSV's competition here
LNDT vs AURI Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and AURI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AURI's competition here
LNDT vs RTSO Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTSO's competition here
LNDT vs SUBB Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SUBB's competition here
LNDT vs CTBG Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTBG's competition here
LNDT vs BMMCF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check BMMCF's competition here
LNDT vs USEI Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and USEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USEI's competition here
LNDT vs PTOG Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check PTOG's competition here
LNDT vs SYNE Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SYNE's competition here
LNDT vs AMCF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check AMCF's competition here
LNDT vs CDVIQ Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check CDVIQ's competition here
LNDT vs POOSF Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check POOSF's competition here
LNDT vs EHYD Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EHYD's competition here
LNDT vs NNYR Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNYR's competition here
LNDT vs ALRY Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALRY's competition here
LNDT vs ISYX Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISYX's competition here
LNDT vs CHMR Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHMR's competition here
LNDT vs TXGE Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TXGE's competition here
LNDT vs SAPMD Comparison August 2025
LNDT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNDT stands at 3.6K. In comparison, SAPMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNDT is priced at $0.00, while SAPMD trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNDT's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SAPMD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNDT is less volatile compared to SAPMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNDT.Check SAPMD's competition here