Lion One Metals Limited
Lion One Metals Limited LLO.AX Peers
See (LLO.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
LLO.AX vs NEM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NEM.AX has a market cap of 92.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NEM.AX trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NEM.AX's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEM.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NEM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NST.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NST.AX has a market cap of 28.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NST.AX trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NST.AX's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NST.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NST.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NCM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NCM.AX has a market cap of 20.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NCM.AX trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NCM.AX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NCM.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NCM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs EVN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, EVN.AX has a market cap of 17.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while EVN.AX trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas EVN.AX's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVN.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to EVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AGG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AGG.AX has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AGG.AX trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AGG.AX's P/E ratio is 50.08. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AGG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DEG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DEG.AX has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DEG.AX trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DEG.AX's P/E ratio is -246.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DEG.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DEG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PRU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PRU.AX has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PRU.AX trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PRU.AX's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRU.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PRU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GMD.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GMD.AX has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GMD.AX trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GMD.AX's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMD.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GMD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CMM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CMM.AX has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CMM.AX trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CMM.AX's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CMM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CMM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RRL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RRL.AX has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RRL.AX trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RRL.AX's P/E ratio is -485.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RRL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GOR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GOR.AX has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GOR.AX trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GOR.AX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GOR.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RMS.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RMS.AX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RMS.AX trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RMS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs VAU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, VAU.AX has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while VAU.AX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas VAU.AX's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VAU.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to VAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SSR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SSR.AX has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SSR.AX trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SSR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SSR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs EMR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, EMR.AX has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while EMR.AX trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas EMR.AX's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EMR.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to EMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WAF.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WAF.AX has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WAF.AX trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WAF.AX's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WAF.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WAF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SPR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SPR.AX has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SPR.AX trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SPR.AX's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SPR.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SPR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WGX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WGX.AX has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WGX.AX trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WGX.AX's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WGX.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WGX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RED.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RED.AX has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RED.AX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RED.AX's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RED.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RED.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs OBM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, OBM.AX has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while OBM.AX trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas OBM.AX's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OBM.AX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to OBM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SLR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SLR.AX has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SLR.AX trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SLR.AX's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLR.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SLR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BGL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BGL.AX has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BGL.AX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BGL.AX's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BGL.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CYL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CYL.AX has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CYL.AX trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CYL.AX's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CYL.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CYL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RSG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RSG.AX has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RSG.AX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RSG.AX's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RSG.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RSG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PNR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PNR.AX has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PNR.AX trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PNR.AX's P/E ratio is -36.22. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PNR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PNR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PDI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PDI.AX has a market cap of 956.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PDI.AX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PDI.AX's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PDI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PDI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TIE.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TIE.AX has a market cap of 776.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TIE.AX trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TIE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TIE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TIE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SXG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SXG.AX has a market cap of 764.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SXG.AX trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SXG.AX's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SXG.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SXG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BC8.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BC8.AX has a market cap of 662.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BC8.AX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BC8.AX's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BC8.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BC8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KCN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KCN.AX has a market cap of 536.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KCN.AX trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KCN.AX's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KCN.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ALK.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ALK.AX has a market cap of 478.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ALK.AX trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ALK.AX's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALK.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ALK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TCG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TCG.AX has a market cap of 406.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TCG.AX trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TCG.AX's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TCG.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TCG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MEK.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MEK.AX has a market cap of 364.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MEK.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MEK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MEK.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DCN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DCN.AX has a market cap of 346.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DCN.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DCN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DCN.AX's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SBM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SBM.AX has a market cap of 346.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SBM.AX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SBM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SBM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SBM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WIA.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WIA.AX has a market cap of 299.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WIA.AX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WIA.AX's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WIA.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WIA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BTR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BTR.AX has a market cap of 283.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BTR.AX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BTR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BTR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TBR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TBR.AX has a market cap of 268.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TBR.AX trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TBR.AX's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TBR.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TBR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ORR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ORR.AX has a market cap of 267.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ORR.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ORR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ORR.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ORR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WC8.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WC8.AX has a market cap of 255.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WC8.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WC8.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WC8.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WC8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GCY.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GCY.AX has a market cap of 245.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GCY.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GCY.AX's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GCY.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GCY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FFX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FFX.AX has a market cap of 236.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FFX.AX trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FFX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FFX.AX's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FFX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AUC.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AUC.AX has a market cap of 230.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AUC.AX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AUC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AUC.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AUC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MGV.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MGV.AX has a market cap of 227.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MGV.AX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MGV.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MGV.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MGV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AAR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AAR.AX has a market cap of 226.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AAR.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AAR.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs POL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, POL.AX has a market cap of 214.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while POL.AX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas POL.AX's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to POL.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to POL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RXL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RXL.AX has a market cap of 192.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RXL.AX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RXL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RXL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RXL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MDX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MDX.AX has a market cap of 160.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MDX.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MDX.AX's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDX.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MDX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BRB.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BRB.AX has a market cap of 158.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BRB.AX trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BRB.AX's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRB.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BRB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DLI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DLI.AX has a market cap of 150.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DLI.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DLI.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DLI.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DLI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs X64.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, X64.AX has a market cap of 129.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while X64.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas X64.AX's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to X64.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to X64.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs LRL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, LRL.AX has a market cap of 125.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while LRL.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas LRL.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LRL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to LRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs HRZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, HRZ.AX has a market cap of 124.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while HRZ.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas HRZ.AX's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HRZ.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to HRZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BGD.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BGD.AX has a market cap of 121.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BGD.AX trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BGD.AX's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BGD.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TGM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TGM.AX has a market cap of 118.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TGM.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TGM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TGM.AX's ROE of -4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TGM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BCN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BCN.AX has a market cap of 118.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BCN.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BCN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BCN.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs STN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, STN.AX has a market cap of 118.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while STN.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas STN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STN.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to STN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TUL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TUL.AX has a market cap of 116.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TUL.AX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TUL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TUL.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MMC.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MMC.AX has a market cap of 115.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MMC.AX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MMC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MMC.AX's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MMC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RND.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RND.AX has a market cap of 108.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RND.AX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RND.AX's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RND.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DTR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DTR.AX has a market cap of 107.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DTR.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DTR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DTR.AX's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TTM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TTM.AX has a market cap of 104.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TTM.AX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TTM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TTM.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs LSX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, LSX.AX has a market cap of 100.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while LSX.AX trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas LSX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LSX.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to LSX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CAI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CAI.AX has a market cap of 93.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CAI.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CAI.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CAI.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CAI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ERM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ERM.AX has a market cap of 88.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ERM.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ERM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ERM.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ERM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KNB.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KNB.AX has a market cap of 80.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KNB.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KNB.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KNB.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KNB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs HRN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, HRN.AX has a market cap of 79.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while HRN.AX trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas HRN.AX's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HRN.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to HRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TRY.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TRY.AX has a market cap of 78.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TRY.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TRY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRY.AX's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TRY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KSN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KSN.AX has a market cap of 73.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KSN.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KSN.AX's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KSN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KSN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WMC.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WMC.AX has a market cap of 72.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WMC.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WMC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WMC.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WMC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CY5.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CY5.AX has a market cap of 71.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CY5.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CY5.AX's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CY5.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CY5.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs VTM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, VTM.AX has a market cap of 70.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while VTM.AX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas VTM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VTM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to VTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AME.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AME.AX has a market cap of 69.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AME.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AME.AX's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AME.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FML.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FML.AX has a market cap of 68.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FML.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FML.AX's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FML.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GHM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GHM.AX has a market cap of 68.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GHM.AX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GHM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GHM.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GHM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KIN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KIN.AX has a market cap of 67.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KIN.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KIN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KIN.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GPR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GPR.AX has a market cap of 66.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GPR.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GPR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GPR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GPR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CHZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CHZ.AX has a market cap of 65.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CHZ.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CHZ.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHZ.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CHZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WCN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WCN.AX has a market cap of 64.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WCN.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WCN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WCN.AX's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to WCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs VAN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, VAN.AX has a market cap of 59.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while VAN.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas VAN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VAN.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to VAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KAU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KAU.AX has a market cap of 58.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KAU.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KAU.AX's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KAU.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs HAV.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, HAV.AX has a market cap of 57.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while HAV.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas HAV.AX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HAV.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to HAV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs YRL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, YRL.AX has a market cap of 55.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while YRL.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas YRL.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YRL.AX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to YRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FXG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FXG.AX has a market cap of 52.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FXG.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FXG.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FXG.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FXG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KAI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KAI.AX has a market cap of 52.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KAI.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KAI.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KAI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KAI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TSO.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TSO.AX has a market cap of 52.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TSO.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TSO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSO.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TSO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WWI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WWI.AX has a market cap of 49.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WWI.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WWI.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WWI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WWI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MAT.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MAT.AX has a market cap of 49.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MAT.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MAT.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs VTX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, VTX.AX has a market cap of 45.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while VTX.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas VTX.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VTX.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to VTX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NXM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NXM.AX has a market cap of 44.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NXM.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NXM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NXM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TAM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TAM.AX has a market cap of 42.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TAM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TAM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TAM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs IXR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, IXR.AX has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while IXR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas IXR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IXR.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to IXR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TRE.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TRE.AX has a market cap of 38.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TRE.AX trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TRE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRE.AX's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AGC.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AGC.AX has a market cap of 37.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AGC.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AGC.AX's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGC.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AGC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AUN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AUN.AX has a market cap of 37.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AUN.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AUN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AUN.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SKY.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SKY.AX has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SKY.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SKY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SKY.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to SKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AWJ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AWJ.AX has a market cap of 34.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AWJ.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AWJ.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AWJ.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AWJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MZZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MZZ.AX has a market cap of 29.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MZZ.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MZZ.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MZZ.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MZZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AOU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AOU.AX has a market cap of 28.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AOU.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AOU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOU.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AOU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TOR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TOR.AX has a market cap of 26.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TOR.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TOR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AQI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AQI.AX has a market cap of 25.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AQI.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AQI.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AQI.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AQI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ANL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ANL.AX has a market cap of 25.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ANL.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ANL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ANL.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ANL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs IR1.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, IR1.AX has a market cap of 24.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while IR1.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas IR1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IR1.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to IR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KRM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KRM.AX has a market cap of 24.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KRM.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KRM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KRM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KRM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BNR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BNR.AX has a market cap of 22.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BNR.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BNR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BNR.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BNR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs OKR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, OKR.AX has a market cap of 22.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while OKR.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas OKR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OKR.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to OKR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AAM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AAM.AX has a market cap of 21.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AAM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AAM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAM.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs 1VG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, 1VG.AX has a market cap of 20.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while 1VG.AX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas 1VG.AX's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1VG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to 1VG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FAL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FAL.AX has a market cap of 20.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FAL.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FAL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FAL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KZR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KZR.AX has a market cap of 19.53M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KZR.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KZR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KZR.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KZR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs HMG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, HMG.AX has a market cap of 19.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while HMG.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas HMG.AX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HMG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to HMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs OZM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, OZM.AX has a market cap of 18.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while OZM.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas OZM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OZM.AX's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to OZM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs HAW.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, HAW.AX has a market cap of 18.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while HAW.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas HAW.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HAW.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to HAW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ODY.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ODY.AX has a market cap of 17.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ODY.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ODY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ODY.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ODY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NAG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NAG.AX has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NAG.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NAG.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NAG.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NAG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ICL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ICL.AX has a market cap of 16.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ICL.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ICL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ICL.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ICL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BEZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BEZ.AX has a market cap of 16.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BEZ.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BEZ.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BEZ.AX's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BEZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KAL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KAL.AX has a market cap of 16.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KAL.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KAL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KAL.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KAL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MAG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MAG.AX has a market cap of 16.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MAG.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MAG.AX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAG.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MAG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MVL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MVL.AX has a market cap of 16.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MVL.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MVL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MVL.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MVL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MCT.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MCT.AX has a market cap of 15.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MCT.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MCT.AX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MCT.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to MCT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WMG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WMG.AX has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WMG.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WMG.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WMG.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CVR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CVR.AX has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CVR.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CVR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CVR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TYX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TYX.AX has a market cap of 13.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TYX.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TYX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TYX.AX's ROE of +14.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TYX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WGR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WGR.AX has a market cap of 13.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WGR.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WGR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WGR.AX's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SRR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SRR.AX has a market cap of 13.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SRR.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SRR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRR.AX's ROE of -8.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs REZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, REZ.AX has a market cap of 12.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while REZ.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas REZ.AX's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to REZ.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to REZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PGD.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PGD.AX has a market cap of 12.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PGD.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PGD.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PGD.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NWM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NWM.AX has a market cap of 12.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NWM.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NWM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NWM.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NWM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AHK.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AHK.AX has a market cap of 12.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AHK.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AHK.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AHK.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NTL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NTL.AX has a market cap of 12.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NTL.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NTL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NTL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SNG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SNG.AX has a market cap of 12.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SNG.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SNG.AX's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNG.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SNG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GMN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GMN.AX has a market cap of 12.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GMN.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GMN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMN.AX's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GMN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BBX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BBX.AX has a market cap of 12.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BBX.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BBX.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BBX.AX's ROE of +18.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BBX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CTO.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CTO.AX has a market cap of 12.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CTO.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CTO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTO.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to CTO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GML.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GML.AX has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GML.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GML.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GML.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NSM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NSM.AX has a market cap of 11.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NSM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NSM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NSM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TRM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TRM.AX has a market cap of 11.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TRM.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TRM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRM.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TRM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MAN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MAN.AX has a market cap of 11.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MAN.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MAN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAN.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MKG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MKG.AX has a market cap of 10.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MKG.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MKG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MKG.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MKG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NML.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NML.AX has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NML.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NML.AX's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NML.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GBZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GBZ.AX has a market cap of 10.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GBZ.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GBZ.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GBZ.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GBZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PGO.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PGO.AX has a market cap of 10.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PGO.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PGO.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PGO.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PNM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PNM.AX has a market cap of 10.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PNM.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PNM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PNM.AX's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PNM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FG1.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FG1.AX has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FG1.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FG1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FG1.AX's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FG1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ADG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ADG.AX has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ADG.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ADG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADG.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to ADG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RR1.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RR1.AX has a market cap of 9.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RR1.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RR1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RR1.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RR1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs VKA.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, VKA.AX has a market cap of 9.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while VKA.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas VKA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VKA.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to VKA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ZAG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ZAG.AX has a market cap of 8.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ZAG.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ZAG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZAG.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ZAG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NME.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NME.AX has a market cap of 8.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NME.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NME.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NME.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FNR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FNR.AX has a market cap of 8.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FNR.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FNR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FNR.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to FNR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AAU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AAU.AX has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AAU.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AAU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAU.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CDT.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CDT.AX has a market cap of 8.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CDT.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CDT.AX's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDT.AX's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to CDT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KWR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KWR.AX has a market cap of 8.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KWR.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KWR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KWR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KWR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GMR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GMR.AX has a market cap of 8.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GMR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GMR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMR.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KGD.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KGD.AX has a market cap of 7.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KGD.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KGD.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KGD.AX's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ALY.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ALY.AX has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ALY.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ALY.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALY.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to ALY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs M2M.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, M2M.AX has a market cap of 6.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while M2M.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas M2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to M2M.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to M2M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GLA.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GLA.AX has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GLA.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLA.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SAU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SAU.AX has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SAU.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SAU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAU.AX's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RGL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RGL.AX has a market cap of 6.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RGL.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RGL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RGL.AX's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to RGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TMX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TMX.AX has a market cap of 6.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TMX.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TMX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMX.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NES.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NES.AX has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NES.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NES.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NES.AX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NES.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PRX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PRX.AX has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PRX.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PRX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs FAU.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, FAU.AX has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while FAU.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas FAU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAU.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to FAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs KTA.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, KTA.AX has a market cap of 6.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while KTA.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas KTA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KTA.AX's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to KTA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs BDG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, BDG.AX has a market cap of 6.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while BDG.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas BDG.AX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BDG.AX's ROE of -36.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to BDG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs LSR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, LSR.AX has a market cap of 5.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while LSR.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas LSR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LSR.AX's ROE of +9.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to LSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AYM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AYM.AX has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AYM.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AYM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AYM.AX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to AYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MBK.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MBK.AX has a market cap of 5.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MBK.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MBK.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MBK.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MBK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs ASR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, ASR.AX has a market cap of 5.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while ASR.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas ASR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASR.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to ASR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CDR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CDR.AX has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CDR.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CDR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDR.AX's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CDR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs OZZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, OZZ.AX has a market cap of 5.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while OZZ.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas OZZ.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OZZ.AX's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to OZZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SRI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SRI.AX has a market cap of 5.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SRI.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SRI.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRI.AX's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SRI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MDI.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MDI.AX has a market cap of 4.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MDI.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MDI.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDI.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MDI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs E79.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, E79.AX has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while E79.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas E79.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to E79.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to E79.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RBX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RBX.AX has a market cap of 4.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RBX.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RBX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RBX.AX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RBX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs NPM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, NPM.AX has a market cap of 4.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while NPM.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas NPM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPM.AX's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to NPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs A8G.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, A8G.AX has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while A8G.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas A8G.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to A8G.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to A8G.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs R8R.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, R8R.AX has a market cap of 3.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while R8R.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas R8R.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to R8R.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to R8R.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SMS.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SMS.AX has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SMS.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SMS.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMS.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RMX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RMX.AX has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RMX.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RMX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMX.AX's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GCX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GCX.AX has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GCX.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GCX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GCX.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GCX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs MRZ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, MRZ.AX has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while MRZ.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas MRZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MRZ.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to MRZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SNX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SNX.AX has a market cap of 3.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SNX.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SNX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNX.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TMB.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TMB.AX has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TMB.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TMB.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMB.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TMB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AAJ.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AAJ.AX has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AAJ.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AAJ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAJ.AX's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to AAJ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs RAS.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, RAS.AX has a market cap of 2.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while RAS.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas RAS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RAS.AX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to RAS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SFM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SFM.AX has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SFM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SFM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to SFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WC1.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WC1.AX has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WC1.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WC1.AX's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WC1.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WC1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DAF.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DAF.AX has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DAF.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DAF.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DAF.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DAF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GNM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GNM.AX has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GNM.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GNM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GNM.AX's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GNM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs PVW.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, PVW.AX has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while PVW.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas PVW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PVW.AX's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to PVW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs TKL.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, TKL.AX has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while TKL.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas TKL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TKL.AX's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to TKL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs CGN.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, CGN.AX has a market cap of 2.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while CGN.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas CGN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CGN.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to CGN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs WSR.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, WSR.AX has a market cap of 1.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while WSR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas WSR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WSR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to WSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DMG.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DMG.AX has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DMG.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DMG.AX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs GSM.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, GSM.AX has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while GSM.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas GSM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GSM.AX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to GSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DBO.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DBO.AX has a market cap of 1.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DBO.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DBO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DBO.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to DBO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs DCX.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, DCX.AX has a market cap of 66052.00. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while DCX.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas DCX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DCX.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is less volatile compared to DCX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs AWV.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, AWV.AX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while AWV.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas AWV.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AWV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLO.AX is more volatile compared to AWV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLO.AX.
LLO.AX vs SIH.AX Comparison
LLO.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLO.AX stands at 162.46M. In comparison, SIH.AX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LLO.AX is priced at $0.62, while SIH.AX trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -10.33, whereas SIH.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLO.AX's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SIH.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LLO.AX has daily volatility of 14.17 and SIH.AX has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEM.AX | $83.52 | -0.45% | 92.96B | 12.37 | $6.75 | +1.81% |
| NST.AX | $19.77 | -0.60% | 28.26B | 24.11 | $0.82 | +2.53% |
| NCM.AX | $23.35 | -1.27% | 20.88B | 17.56 | $1.33 | N/A |
| EVN.AX | $8.63 | -0.12% | 17.17B | 24.66 | $0.35 | +1.39% |
| AGG.AX | $6.51 | -3.27% | 13.94B | 50.08 | $0.13 | N/A |
| DEG.AX | $2.46 | -8.21% | 5.92B | -246.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PRU.AX | $3.61 | -0.55% | 4.93B | 9.02 | $0.40 | +1.73% |
| GMD.AX | $4.36 | +0.23% | 4.93B | 39.64 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CMM.AX | $9.72 | -0.10% | 4.19B | 48.60 | $0.20 | N/A |
| RRL.AX | $4.85 | -0.21% | 3.66B | -485.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |