Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc.
Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. LLLI Peers
See (LLLI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLLI | $0.01 | -23.48% | 1.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EADSY | $46.21 | -1.89% | 145.5B | 28.88 | $1.60 | +1.83% |
| EADSF | $184.70 | -1.96% | 145.4B | 28.81 | $6.41 | +1.83% |
| SAFRF | $292.51 | -2.81% | 121.9B | -159.84 | -$1.83 | +0.91% |
| SAFRY | $72.68 | -2.53% | 121.8B | -157.99 | -$0.46 | +0.97% |
| RYCEY | $11.90 | -2.06% | 100.7B | 29.75 | $0.40 | +0.47% |
| RYCEF | $11.79 | -2.08% | 99.8B | 29.48 | $0.40 | +0.50% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | -5.17% | 96.6B | 0.31 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RNMBF | $2,065.28 | +2.65% | 94B | 105.64 | $19.55 | +0.39% |
| RNMBY | $412.76 | +2.19% | 92.1B | 97.12 | $4.25 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
LLLI vs EADSY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while EADSY trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs EADSF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while EADSF trades at $184.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SAFRF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SAFRF trades at $292.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -159.84. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SAFRY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SAFRY trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -157.99. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RYCEY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RYCEY trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RYCEF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RYCEF trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RLLCF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RNMBF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RNMBF trades at $2,065.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 105.64. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RNMBY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RNMBY trades at $412.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 97.12. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BAESF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BAESF trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BAESY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BAESY trades at $105.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs FINMY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while FINMY trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs THLEF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while THLEF trades at $295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 52.87. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs THLLY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while THLLY trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 51.41. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs FINMF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while FINMF trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs DUAVF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while DUAVF trades at $351.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SAABY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SAABY trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SAABF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SAABF trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MTUAY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MTUAY trades at $198.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MTUAF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MTUAF trades at $389.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SGGKF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SGGKF trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and SGGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs SGGKY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SGGKY trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs HAGHY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while HAGHY trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 119.98. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs HNSDF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while HNSDF trades at $109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 139.74. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BDRXF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BDRXF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and BDRXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs BOMBF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BOMBF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BDRBF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BDRBF trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BDRAF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BDRAF trades at $73.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs NSKFF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while NSKFF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs YSHLF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while YSHLF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ACLLY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ACLLY trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SMBMF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SMBMF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BDRPF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and BDRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs SMBMY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SMBMY trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs FNCNF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while FNCNF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 89.53. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ACLIF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ACLIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs AVIJF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while AVIJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs QNTQY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while QNTQY trades at $28.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -16.03. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs QNTQF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while QNTQF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and QNTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs MDALF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MDALF trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs CMGMY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while CMGMY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs CMGMF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while CMGMF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs AUTLF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while AUTLF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs GGRGF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs LSIIF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while LSIIF trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ATROB Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ATROB trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -327.27. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs CZGZF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while CZGZF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and CZGZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs MIESY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and MIESY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs SNIRF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 812.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SNIRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MIESF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MALJF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 742.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MALJF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and MALJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs HERXF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and HERXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs AVNBF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 718.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while AVNBF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 115.24. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ASTGY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and ASTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs AERG Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 436.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while AERG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs JMCCF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs EOPSF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 313.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while EOPSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs FTGFF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while FTGFF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and FTGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs BUKS Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BUKS trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs SAFS Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs NORSF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while NORSF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs CNRD Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while CNRD trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 320.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ACCMF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ACCMF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -50.43. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and ACCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs TIPGF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs VLTTF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -7.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs STTLF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and STTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs NRPI Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while NRPI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs QCKSF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs OPST Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while OPST trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MAXQF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MAXQF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ETCC Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ETCC trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs AKRRF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs TIKK Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while TIKK trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs NEXD Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while NEXD trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs FLYLF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs XERI Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs OBTEF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while OBTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs USDR Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and USDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs SNAVF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SNAVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and SNAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs DEWY Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while DEWY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and DEWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs HWKE Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 870.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while HWKE trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs PMEA Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MDEX Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and MDEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs DLRWF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LLLI has daily volatility of 0.00 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
LLLI vs RNWR Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and RNWR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs PSSR Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 123.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while PSSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs CFFMF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and CFFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs DSUS Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and DSUS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs UITA Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and UITA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs ASAV Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and ASAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs LNGT Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs ADFS Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and ADFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs SDSS Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs MSNVF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and MSNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs EPEO Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs BANT Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BANT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI and BANT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LLLI vs BRSI Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs HSFI Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.
LLLI vs RDEGF Comparison
LLLI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLLI stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLLI is priced at $0.01, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LLLI's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLLI is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLLI.