Link Administration Holdings Limited
Link Administration Holdings Limited (LKADF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LKADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKADF | $1.44 | -53.40% | 759.7M | 3.13 | $0.46 | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 114.9B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| CIIHY | $36.25 | +0.00% | 60.2B | 17.26 | $2.10 | +2.00% |
| MQBKY | $140.77 | -0.17% | 54.3B | 19.64 | $7.18 | +2.81% |
| MCQEF | $141.12 | +0.47% | 51.5B | 19.63 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $3.03 | +0.00% | 49.1B | 14.43 | $0.21 | +2.40% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | +0.00% | 31B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| CNICF | $2.68 | -9.15% | 20.2B | 19.14 | $0.14 | +0.94% |
| NRSCF | $6.71 | -6.81% | 19.8B | 8.95 | $0.75 | +5.79% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
LKADF vs IBKKF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check IBKKF's competition here
LKADF vs CIIHY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CIIHY trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CIIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIIHY's competition here
LKADF vs MQBKY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while MQBKY trades at $140.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check MQBKY's competition here
LKADF vs MCQEF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while MCQEF trades at $141.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCQEF's competition here
LKADF vs CIIHF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CIIHF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CIIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIIHF's competition here
LKADF vs GUOSF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and GUOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUOSF's competition here
LKADF vs CNICF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CNICF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CNICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNICF's competition here
LKADF vs NRSCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while NRSCF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and NRSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRSCF's competition here
LKADF vs HTNGF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTNGF's competition here
LKADF vs HUATF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check HUATF's competition here
LKADF vs CMSQY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CMSQY trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CMSQY's competition here
LKADF vs CMSQF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CMSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMSQF's competition here
LKADF vs CGXYY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CGXYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGXYY's competition here
LKADF vs HAITY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAITY's competition here
LKADF vs DSEEY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DSEEY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check DSEEY's competition here
LKADF vs DSECF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DSECF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and DSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSECF's competition here
LKADF vs WSOUF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check WSOUF's competition here
LKADF vs BRPHF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BRPHF's competition here
LKADF vs IVTJF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check IVTJF's competition here
LKADF vs IGGHY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IGGHY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGGHY's competition here
LKADF vs IVTJY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check IVTJY's competition here
LKADF vs IGGRF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check IGGRF's competition here
LKADF vs CLPE Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPE's competition here
LKADF vs FNNTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while FNNTF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and FNNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNNTF's competition here
LKADF vs TCAPF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while TCAPF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and TCAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCAPF's competition here
LKADF vs LTSAP Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while LTSAP trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check LTSAP's competition here
LKADF vs MAUSY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check MAUSY's competition here
LKADF vs PLSQF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLSQF's competition here
LKADF vs LTSA Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check LTSA's competition here
LKADF vs NHMAF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHMAF's competition here
LKADF vs MNXBF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and MNXBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXBF's competition here
LKADF vs DEFTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check DEFTF's competition here
LKADF vs CFNCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CFNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFNCF's competition here
LKADF vs CBGPY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 881.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CBGPY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBGPY's competition here
LKADF vs CCORF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 820.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CCORF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCORF's competition here
LKADF vs CNSRF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 792M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CNSRF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CNSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSRF's competition here
LKADF vs CBGPF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CBGPF's competition here
LKADF vs PHIGW Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 680.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check PHIGW's competition here
LKADF vs PHIG Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 674.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while PHIG trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check PHIG's competition here
LKADF vs NAGGF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check NAGGF's competition here
LKADF vs CSCHF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CSCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CSCHF's competition here
LKADF vs ABGSF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 342.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ABGSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and ABGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABGSF's competition here
LKADF vs CESTY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CESTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CESTY's competition here
LKADF vs CESTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CESTF's competition here
LKADF vs APPCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while APPCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and APPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APPCF's competition here
LKADF vs OSHDF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check OSHDF's competition here
LKADF vs CYFRF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CYFRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 82.74. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CYFRF's competition here
LKADF vs ABIT Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ABIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check ABIT's competition here
LKADF vs NPPTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while NPPTF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 49.70. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check NPPTF's competition here
LKADF vs CAGPF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CAGPF's competition here
LKADF vs OZFRY Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check OZFRY's competition here
LKADF vs STGC Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check STGC's competition here
LKADF vs ARCNF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check ARCNF's competition here
LKADF vs PNPFF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while PNPFF trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and PNPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNPFF's competition here
LKADF vs GEVI Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while GEVI trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check GEVI's competition here
LKADF vs CURN Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CURN trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CURN's competition here
LKADF vs DGTLF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check DGTLF's competition here
LKADF vs XAUMF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while XAUMF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and XAUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XAUMF's competition here
LKADF vs DMGGF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DMGGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check DMGGF's competition here
LKADF vs UFFRF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UFFRF's competition here
LKADF vs CBTTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CBTTF's competition here
LKADF vs HAFG Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HAFG trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check HAFG's competition here
LKADF vs FDCT Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while FDCT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check FDCT's competition here
LKADF vs CMZZF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMZZF's competition here
LKADF vs BBKCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BBKCF's competition here
LKADF vs CFLSF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CFLSF's competition here
LKADF vs CRMZ Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CRMZ trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CRMZ's competition here
LKADF vs EBML Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check EBML's competition here
LKADF vs ARBKF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check ARBKF's competition here
LKADF vs BULT Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BULT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BULT's competition here
LKADF vs SMURF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check SMURF's competition here
LKADF vs HYHDF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HYHDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check HYHDF's competition here
LKADF vs BCNWF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BCNWF's competition here
LKADF vs FWAV Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWAV's competition here
LKADF vs MATEF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while MATEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check MATEF's competition here
LKADF vs DYNA Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and DYNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DYNA's competition here
LKADF vs AVFCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check AVFCF's competition here
LKADF vs DBKSF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DBKSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DBKSF's competition here
LKADF vs HIPH Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check HIPH's competition here
LKADF vs DPXCF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and DPXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPXCF's competition here
LKADF vs TRAA Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check TRAA's competition here
LKADF vs ABSOF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ABSOF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check ABSOF's competition here
LKADF vs FFTTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check FFTTF's competition here
LKADF vs ITEX Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while ITEX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check ITEX's competition here
LKADF vs BLVDF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BLVDF's competition here
LKADF vs AAMTF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check AAMTF's competition here
LKADF vs BTCWF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BTCWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BTCWF's competition here
LKADF vs IHLDF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHLDF's competition here
LKADF vs CSTXF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CSTXF's competition here
LKADF vs CCPUF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CCPUF's competition here
LKADF vs PHIL Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check PHIL's competition here
LKADF vs BZRD Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZRD's competition here
LKADF vs CRKR Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CRKR's competition here
LKADF vs BKBLF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BKBLF's competition here
LKADF vs BKLIF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BKLIF's competition here
LKADF vs GBCHF Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check GBCHF's competition here
LKADF vs BLQC Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BLQC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check BLQC's competition here
LKADF vs BEGI Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF and BEGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEGI's competition here
LKADF vs CBTC Comparison July 2025
LKADF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKADF stands at 759.7M. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKADF is priced at $1.44, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKADF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.13, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKADF's ROE is -0.89%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKADF is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKADF.Check CBTC's competition here