Litigation Capital Management Limited
Litigation Capital Management Limited (LIT.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT.L | £30.00 | +12.78% | 32.9M | -15.00 | -£0.02 | +4.17% |
| 0R2Z.L | £557.20 | -3.08% | 502.2B | 39.13 | £14.24 | +0.53% |
| GACB.L | £110.00 | +0.00% | 30.8B | 1.83 | £0.60 | +38.30% |
| GACA.L | £110.00 | +0.00% | 30.8B | 1.83 | £0.60 | +50.50% |
| 0QIG.L | £6.52 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -4.81 | -£1.36 | N/A |
| LENZ.L | £108.00 | N/A | 645.8M | -0.49 | -£2.20 | N/A |
| PFG.L | £225.00 | +0.00% | 571.2M | 5.49 | £0.41 | N/A |
| IPF.L | £212.00 | +0.24% | 463.3M | 6.84 | £0.31 | +3.98% |
| FCH.L | £130.20 | -3.70% | 388M | 0.94 | £1.39 | N/A |
| 47IE.L | £65.00 | +0.00% | 343.2M | N/A | £312.70 | +5.75% |
Stock Comparison
LIT.L vs 0R2Z.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, 0R2Z.L has a market cap of 502.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while 0R2Z.L trades at £557.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas 0R2Z.L's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0R2Z.L's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to 0R2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check 0R2Z.L's competition here
LIT.L vs GACB.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, GACB.L has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while GACB.L trades at £110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GACB.L's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GACB.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to GACB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check GACB.L's competition here
LIT.L vs GACA.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, GACA.L has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while GACA.L trades at £110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas GACA.L's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GACA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to GACA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check GACA.L's competition here
LIT.L vs 0QIG.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, 0QIG.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while 0QIG.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas 0QIG.L's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QIG.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to 0QIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check 0QIG.L's competition here
LIT.L vs LENZ.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, LENZ.L has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while LENZ.L trades at £108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas LENZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LENZ.L's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to LENZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check LENZ.L's competition here
LIT.L vs PFG.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, PFG.L has a market cap of 571.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while PFG.L trades at £225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas PFG.L's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to PFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check PFG.L's competition here
LIT.L vs IPF.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, IPF.L has a market cap of 463.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while IPF.L trades at £212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas IPF.L's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to IPF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check IPF.L's competition here
LIT.L vs FCH.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, FCH.L has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while FCH.L trades at £130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas FCH.L's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to FCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check FCH.L's competition here
LIT.L vs 47IE.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, 47IE.L has a market cap of 343.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while 47IE.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas 47IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 47IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is less volatile compared to 47IE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check 47IE.L's competition here
LIT.L vs EQLS.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, EQLS.L has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while EQLS.L trades at £139.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas EQLS.L's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQLS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to EQLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check EQLS.L's competition here
LIT.L vs HAT.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, HAT.L has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while HAT.L trades at £648.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas HAT.L's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to HAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check HAT.L's competition here
LIT.L vs VANQ.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, VANQ.L has a market cap of 245.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while VANQ.L trades at £96.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas VANQ.L's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VANQ.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to VANQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check VANQ.L's competition here
LIT.L vs SUS.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, SUS.L has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while SUS.L trades at £1,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas SUS.L's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to SUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check SUS.L's competition here
LIT.L vs ASAI.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, ASAI.L has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while ASAI.L trades at £125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ASAI.L's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASAI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to ASAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check ASAI.L's competition here
LIT.L vs TRU.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, TRU.L has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while TRU.L trades at £98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TRU.L's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRU.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to TRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check TRU.L's competition here
LIT.L vs APP.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, APP.L has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while APP.L trades at £42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas APP.L's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to APP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check APP.L's competition here
LIT.L vs DFCH.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, DFCH.L has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while DFCH.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas DFCH.L's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DFCH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to DFCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check DFCH.L's competition here
LIT.L vs BFSP.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, BFSP.L has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while BFSP.L trades at £92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas BFSP.L's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BFSP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to BFSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check BFSP.L's competition here
LIT.L vs TIME.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, TIME.L has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while TIME.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TIME.L's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIME.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to TIME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check TIME.L's competition here
LIT.L vs AWEM.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, AWEM.L has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while AWEM.L trades at £134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AWEM.L's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AWEM.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to AWEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check AWEM.L's competition here
LIT.L vs BANK.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, BANK.L has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while BANK.L trades at £8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas BANK.L's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BANK.L's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to BANK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check BANK.L's competition here
LIT.L vs ORCH.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, ORCH.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while ORCH.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ORCH.L's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORCH.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to ORCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check ORCH.L's competition here
LIT.L vs CIN.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, CIN.L has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while CIN.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas CIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIN.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIT.L has daily volatility of 12.01 and CIN.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check CIN.L's competition here
LIT.L vs VCAP.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, VCAP.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while VCAP.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas VCAP.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCAP.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is less volatile compared to VCAP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check VCAP.L's competition here
LIT.L vs LEND.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, LEND.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while LEND.L trades at £0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas LEND.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to LEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check LEND.L's competition here
LIT.L vs ZAIM.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, ZAIM.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while ZAIM.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas ZAIM.L's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZAIM.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to ZAIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check ZAIM.L's competition here
LIT.L vs AMGO.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, AMGO.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while AMGO.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas AMGO.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMGO.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to AMGO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check AMGO.L's competition here
LIT.L vs NSF.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, NSF.L has a market cap of 274.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while NSF.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas NSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSF.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to NSF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check NSF.L's competition here
LIT.L vs 46IE.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, 46IE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while 46IE.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas 46IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 46IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to 46IE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check 46IE.L's competition here
LIT.L vs TSL.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, TSL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while TSL.L trades at £28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas TSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSL.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIT.L has daily volatility of 12.01 and TSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check TSL.L's competition here
LIT.L vs PCF.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, PCF.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while PCF.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas PCF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCF.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIT.L has daily volatility of 12.01 and PCF.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCF.L's competition here
LIT.L vs MCL.L Comparison August 2025
LIT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIT.L stands at 32.9M. In comparison, MCL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIT.L is priced at £30.00, while MCL.L trades at £0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.00, whereas MCL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIT.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCL.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIT.L is more volatile compared to MCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIT.L.Check MCL.L's competition here