Bank Linth LLB AG
Bank Linth LLB AG (LINN.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LINN.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINN.SW | CHF 585.00 | +0.00% | 0 | 16.44 | CHF 35.59 | N/A |
| DBK.SW | CHF 23.72 | +3.40% | 85.6B | 10.05 | CHF 2.36 | +2.68% |
| LLOY.SW | CHF 0.83 | N/A | 38.3B | 10.35 | CHF 0.08 | +1.59% |
| GLE.SW | CHF 24.17 | N/A | 15.4B | 14.05 | CHF 1.72 | +2.65% |
| BCVN.SW | CHF 129.40 | +1.33% | 11.1B | 25.83 | CHF 5.01 | +3.40% |
| LUKN.SW | CHF 106.00 | +0.38% | 5.2B | 17.76 | CHF 5.97 | +2.45% |
| SGKN.SW | CHF 679.00 | +0.74% | 4.1B | 17.89 | CHF 37.95 | +2.80% |
| BEKN.SW | CHF 408.50 | +0.62% | 3.8B | 22.21 | CHF 18.39 | +2.55% |
| LLBN.SW | CHF 99.60 | -0.60% | 3B | 18.31 | CHF 5.44 | +2.81% |
| ZUGER.SW | CHF 10,250.00 | +0.49% | 2.9B | 22.47 | CHF 456.13 | +2.15% |
Stock Comparison
LINN.SW vs DBK.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, DBK.SW has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while DBK.SW trades at CHF 23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas DBK.SW's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBK.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW and DBK.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DBK.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs LLOY.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LLOY.SW has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while LLOY.SW trades at CHF 0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas LLOY.SW's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLOY.SW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW and LLOY.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLOY.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs GLE.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, GLE.SW has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while GLE.SW trades at CHF 24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas GLE.SW's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLE.SW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW and GLE.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLE.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BCVN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BCVN.SW has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BCVN.SW trades at CHF 129.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BCVN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCVN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to BCVN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check BCVN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs LUKN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LUKN.SW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while LUKN.SW trades at CHF 106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas LUKN.SW's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUKN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to LUKN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check LUKN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs SGKN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SGKN.SW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while SGKN.SW trades at CHF 679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas SGKN.SW's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGKN.SW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to SGKN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check SGKN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BEKN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BEKN.SW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BEKN.SW trades at CHF 408.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BEKN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEKN.SW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to BEKN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check BEKN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs LLBN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LLBN.SW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while LLBN.SW trades at CHF 99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas LLBN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLBN.SW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to LLBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check LLBN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs ZUGER.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ZUGER.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while ZUGER.SW trades at CHF 10,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ZUGER.SW's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZUGER.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to ZUGER.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check ZUGER.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs CMBN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CMBN.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while CMBN.SW trades at CHF 100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CMBN.SW's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMBN.SW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to CMBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check CMBN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs VATN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, VATN.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while VATN.SW trades at CHF 177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas VATN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VATN.SW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to VATN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check VATN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BCGE.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BCGE.SW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BCGE.SW trades at CHF 35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BCGE.SW's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCGE.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to BCGE.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check BCGE.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs WKBN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, WKBN.SW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while WKBN.SW trades at CHF 156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas WKBN.SW's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WKBN.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to WKBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check WKBN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs GRKP.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, GRKP.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while GRKP.SW trades at CHF 2,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas GRKP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRKP.SW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to GRKP.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check GRKP.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs TKBP.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, TKBP.SW has a market cap of 754M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while TKBP.SW trades at CHF 188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TKBP.SW's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKBP.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to TKBP.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check TKBP.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BLKB.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BLKB.SW has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BLKB.SW trades at CHF 1,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BLKB.SW's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLKB.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to BLKB.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check BLKB.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BSKP.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BSKP.SW has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BSKP.SW trades at CHF 105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BSKP.SW's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSKP.SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to BSKP.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check BSKP.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs SNBN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SNBN.SW has a market cap of 344M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while SNBN.SW trades at CHF 3,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas SNBN.SW's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNBN.SW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to SNBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check SNBN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs GLKBN.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, GLKBN.SW has a market cap of 326.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while GLKBN.SW trades at CHF 24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas GLKBN.SW's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLKBN.SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW is less volatile compared to GLKBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINN.SW.Check GLKBN.SW's competition here
LINN.SW vs BCJ.SW Comparison April 2026
LINN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINN.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BCJ.SW has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINN.SW is priced at CHF 585.00, while BCJ.SW trades at CHF 92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BCJ.SW's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, LINN.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCJ.SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINN.SW and BCJ.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCJ.SW's competition here