Linedata Services S.A.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, DSY.PA has a market cap of 44.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while DSY.PA trades at $33.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas DSY.PA's P/E ratio is 37.85. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DSY.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to DSY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALTTU.PA has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALTTU.PA trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALTTU.PA's P/E ratio is -545.00. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTTU.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to ALTTU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, VU.PA has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while VU.PA trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas VU.PA's P/E ratio is -65.69. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VU.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to VU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALESK.PA has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALESK.PA trades at $277.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALESK.PA's P/E ratio is 100.14. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALESK.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALESK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, LSS.PA has a market cap of 884.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while LSS.PA trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas LSS.PA's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LSS.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to LSS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ESI.PA has a market cap of 879.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ESI.PA trades at $154.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ESI.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESI.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ESI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, AXW.PA has a market cap of 800.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while AXW.PA trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas AXW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXW.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to AXW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, QDT.PA has a market cap of 577.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while QDT.PA trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas QDT.PA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QDT.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to QDT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, TOM2.AS has a market cap of 565.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while TOM2.AS trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas TOM2.AS's P/E ratio is -32.86. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TOM2.AS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to TOM2.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALBFR.PA has a market cap of 342.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALBFR.PA trades at $242.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALBFR.PA's P/E ratio is 46.52. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALBFR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALBFR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, SWP.PA has a market cap of 292.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while SWP.PA trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas SWP.PA's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWP.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to SWP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, CMCOM.AS has a market cap of 206.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while CMCOM.AS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas CMCOM.AS's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMCOM.AS's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to CMCOM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MTRK.AS has a market cap of 204.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MTRK.AS trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MTRK.AS's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTRK.AS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to MTRK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALVIV.PA has a market cap of 170.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALVIV.PA trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALVIV.PA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALVIV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALVIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, CLA.PA has a market cap of 147.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while CLA.PA trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas CLA.PA's P/E ratio is -51.70. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to CLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, UPG.BR has a market cap of 137.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while UPG.BR trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas UPG.BR's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UPG.BR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to UPG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALTBG.PA has a market cap of 119.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALTBG.PA trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALTBG.PA's P/E ratio is 63.95. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTBG.PA's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALTBG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, HYSG.BR has a market cap of 114.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while HYSG.BR trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas HYSG.BR's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYSG.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to HYSG.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALSTW.PA has a market cap of 91.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALSTW.PA trades at $34.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALSTW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALSTW.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALSTW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALPRO.PA has a market cap of 83.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALPRO.PA trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALPRO.PA's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALPRO.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALPRO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, DLE.IR has a market cap of 65.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while DLE.IR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas DLE.IR's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DLE.IR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to DLE.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALPHI.PA has a market cap of 62.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALPHI.PA trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALPHI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALPHI.PA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALPHI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, TIE.AS has a market cap of 62.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while TIE.AS trades at $31.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas TIE.AS's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIE.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to TIE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, COH.PA has a market cap of 47.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while COH.PA trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas COH.PA's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COH.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to COH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALTTI.PA has a market cap of 26.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALTTI.PA trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALTTI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTTI.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to ALTTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALWED.PA has a market cap of 26.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALWED.PA trades at $30.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALWED.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALWED.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to ALWED.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALPRG.PA has a market cap of 24.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALPRG.PA trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALPRG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALPRG.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALPRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLMCA.PA has a market cap of 24.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLMCA.PA trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLMCA.PA's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLMCA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to MLMCA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, EXR.IR has a market cap of 20.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while EXR.IR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas EXR.IR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXR.IR's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to EXR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALVGO.PA has a market cap of 15.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALVGO.PA trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALVGO.PA's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALVGO.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALVGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALNRG.PA has a market cap of 10.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALNRG.PA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALNRG.PA's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALNRG.PA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALNRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, PROAC.PA has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while PROAC.PA trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas PROAC.PA's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PROAC.PA's ROE of -28.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to PROAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, NEDSE.AS has a market cap of 6.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while NEDSE.AS trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas NEDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEDSE.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to NEDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLPAC.PA has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLPAC.PA trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLPAC.PA's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLPAC.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to MLPAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, GOJXN.AS has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while GOJXN.AS trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas GOJXN.AS's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOJXN.AS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to GOJXN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLTV.BR has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLTV.BR trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLTV.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLTV.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to MLTV.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALSIM.PA has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALSIM.PA trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALSIM.PA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALSIM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to ALSIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, EOS.PA has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while EOS.PA trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas EOS.PA's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOS.PA's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to EOS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLDAM.PA has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLDAM.PA trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLDAM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLDAM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to MLDAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALIMR.PA has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALIMR.PA trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALIMR.PA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALIMR.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALIMR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ALNMR.PA has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ALNMR.PA trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ALNMR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALNMR.PA's ROE of +5.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to ALNMR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLIDS.PA has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLIDS.PA trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLIDS.PA's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLIDS.PA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to MLIDS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, MLMGL.PA has a market cap of 255530.00. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while MLMGL.PA trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas MLMGL.PA's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLMGL.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to MLMGL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, CAS.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while CAS.PA trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas CAS.PA's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAS.PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to CAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, ICT.AS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while ICT.AS trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas ICT.AS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ICT.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to ICT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, PROL.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while PROL.PA trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas PROL.PA's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PROL.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to PROL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, IGE.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while IGE.PA trades at $210.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas IGE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IGE.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to IGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, 6VR.IR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while 6VR.IR trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas 6VR.IR's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 6VR.IR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is more volatile compared to 6VR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.

LIN.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIN.PA stands at 365.04M. In comparison, GENX.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LIN.PA is priced at $73.60, while GENX.PA trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.24, whereas GENX.PA's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, LIN.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GENX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN.PA is less volatile compared to GENX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.PA.