American Lithium Corp.
American Lithium Corp. LIACF Peers
See (LIACF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIACF | $2.90 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.26 | -0.99% | 123.10B | 10.64 | $2.28 | +5.11% |
| RTNTF | $78.57 | +3.89% | 108.42B | 11.11 | $7.07 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $61.16 | -1.75% | 104.68B | 8.65 | $7.07 | +6.38% |
| GLCNF | $3.57 | +0.19% | 42.84B | -27.42 | -$0.13 | +3.22% |
| GLNCY | $7.13 | +0.85% | 42.84B | -27.42 | -$0.26 | +3.01% |
| GMBXF | $5.37 | -1.32% | 41.81B | 11.67 | $0.46 | +2.31% |
| NGLOY | $14.25 | +0.49% | 34.58B | -11.22 | -$1.27 | +2.24% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | N/A | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUMF | $10.35 | -4.61% | 31.82B | 8.15 | $1.27 | +8.55% |
Stock Comparison
LIACF vs BHPLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 123.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BHPLF trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs RTNTF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 108.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while RTNTF trades at $78.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs RTPPF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 104.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while RTPPF trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs GLCNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while GLCNF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs GLNCY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while GLNCY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs GMBXF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while GMBXF trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs NGLOY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while NGLOY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AAUKF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs FSUMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 31.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FSUMF trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and FSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs FSUGY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FSUGY trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs CMCLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while CMCLF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and CMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs TCKRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs IVPAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while IVPAF trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs BOLIF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs BDNNY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BDNNY trades at $63.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SHTLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs IPOAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 122.22. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs JXMNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ABML Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SMMYY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SMMYY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.48. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs STMNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs PUTKF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs LYSCF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LYSCF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 173.33. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs LYSDY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LYSDY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 129.63. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PUTKY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PUTKY trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs NILSY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs PAEKY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MALRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs FLMMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MALRY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MALRY trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PILBF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PILBF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -90.61. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs CHZQ Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs PTNDY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PTNDY trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs NGXXF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while NGXXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MIMTF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PTNDF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs AZZVF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs NICMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while NICMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs AFBOF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs DWMNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SOUHY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SOUHY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.96. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs IIDDY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs IPGDF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while IPGDF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs ERMAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ERMAY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ERMAY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs DETRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs ILKAY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs ADTLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ADTLF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AZRMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs ILKAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ADMLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ADMLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs LINRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LINRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -41.93. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs BQSSF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 943.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BQSSF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -56.87. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs FMCXF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 923.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FMCXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ATUSF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 922.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ATUSF trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs STTSY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AUSDF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs JMXXF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AFMJF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 858.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AMVMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MFRVF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs VULNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs CTJHF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs TAOFF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ALMTF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 500.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ALMTF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs TTNNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MJDLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 491.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MJDLF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs OSTTF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MCRZF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs BIRNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs REEMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 402.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs LLLAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 390.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs FGOVF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 380.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FGOVF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs NQMIY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs MCHHF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 380.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MCHHF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PXMFF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs CTJHY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs MNXMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 350.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MNXMF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ERLFF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 337.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.53. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs KMRPF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs MLYF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs AUMTF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SLGGF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 303.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and SLGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs MLXEF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SVMLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs ARAFF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 276.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs LTSRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 272.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs CGMLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs FWEDF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 269.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while FWEDF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs LRSRF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs STQNF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs SRHYY Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 243.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and SRHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs ERDCF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 242.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while ERDCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -66.70. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PMETF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 239.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PMETF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -50.73. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs RXRLF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs LTHHF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LIACF vs BSRUF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs SYAAF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 236.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while SYAAF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.
LIACF vs PTTMF Comparison
LIACF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIACF stands at N/A. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LIACF is priced at $2.90, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIACF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, LIACF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIACF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIACF.