LIGATT Security International, Inc.
LIGATT Security International, Inc. LGTT Peers
See (LGTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGTT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 384.2K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ASAZY | $15.74 | +0.25% | 34.5B | 22.81 | $0.69 | +1.79% |
| ASAZF | $31.72 | +0.01% | 33.4B | 22.99 | $1.38 | +0.89% |
| SOMLF | $38.19 | N/A | 15.9B | 22.73 | $1.68 | +1.73% |
| SOMLY | $9.32 | +0.22% | 15.5B | 22.19 | $0.42 | +0.50% |
| SCTBY | $15.36 | N/A | 8.4B | 15.52 | $0.99 | +2.63% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | N/A | 8.4B | 15.51 | $0.99 | +2.63% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | N/A | 2.6B | 15.80 | $2.50 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | -80.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.00 | N/A | 392.6M | -166.67 | -$0.03 | +31.00% |
Stock Comparison
LGTT vs ASAZY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ASAZF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SOMLF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SOMLY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SCTBY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SCTBF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs LOIMF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SOHGF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs MRLWF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs CRFQF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ICTSF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.45. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs RSKIA Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs WPNNF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs GKPRF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SECUF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PRBCF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ALXXF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs LDDFF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs CSTI Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs VOTDF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs DIGTF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs DADTF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PLRTF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs IWAL Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SSECF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs MACE Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs DTII Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 580.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs VCON Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs DRNG Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 522.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs BLPG Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 488.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ATWT Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 411.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs WCCP Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs VSYS Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PSGI Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PTEFF Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 117.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SCTY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs MGNT Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs GDSI Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs HCGS Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs MIHL Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs SKVY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ABPR Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs WOAM Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PERL Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs EKCS Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs EBWK Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs HWSY Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs CVAS Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs ARGL Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs DIRV Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs VSYM Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs PWLK Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs HLCN Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.
LGTT vs GTKP Comparison
LGTT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGTT stands at 384.2K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGTT is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGTT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGTT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGTT is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGTT.