Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.
Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. LGF-A Peers
See (LGF-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGF-A | $8.59 | +2.75% | 1.9B | -6.93 | -$1.24 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,284.86 | -0.68% | 546.7B | 60.68 | $21.17 | N/A |
| DIS | $122.98 | -0.41% | 221.1B | 25.10 | $4.90 | +0.81% |
| LYV | $149.11 | -0.51% | 34.6B | 50.55 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONA | $92.43 | +0.72% | 32.4B | 1542.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FWONK | $102.50 | +0.67% | 32.4B | 2050.40 | $0.05 | N/A |
| WBD | $11.12 | +1.65% | 27.5B | -2.53 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOX | $50.77 | -1.59% | 23.8B | 12.57 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| FOXA | $55.13 | -1.50% | 23.7B | 13.64 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
LGF-A vs NFLX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 546.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while NFLX trades at $1,284.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs DIS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 221.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while DIS trades at $122.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LYV Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LYV trades at $149.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 50.55. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs FWONA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while FWONA trades at $92.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1542.00. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs FWONK Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while FWONK trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 2050.40. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs WBD Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while WBD trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs FOX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while FOX trades at $50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs FOXA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while FOXA trades at $55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs VIAC Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs NWS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while NWS trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 41.91. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs NWSA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while NWSA trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs WMG Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while WMG trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs TKO Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while TKO trades at $177.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 89.60. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs ROKU Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while ROKU trades at $86.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -118.34. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs EDR Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs PARA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while PARA trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs PARAA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while PARAA trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs PARAP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs WWE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs SIRI Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while SIRI trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LLYVK Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LLYVK trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 297.52. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LLYVA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LLYVA trades at $78.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 290.74. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs NXST Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while NXST trades at $180.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MSGS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MSGS trades at $208.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 990.62. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CNK Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CNK trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MANU Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MANU trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -32.89. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BATRK Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BATRK trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -140.52. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BATRA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BATRA trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -148.86. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs APE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LGF-B Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MSGE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MSGE trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BOWL Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs IQ Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while IQ trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LION Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LION trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs SPHR Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while SPHR trades at $42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs IMAX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while IMAX trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AMC Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AMC trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs PLAY Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while PLAY trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs SBGI Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while SBGI trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs HUYA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 545.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while HUYA trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -34.86. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MCS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MCS trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -41.76. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RSVR Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RSVR trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AMCX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AMCX trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LIVX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AENT Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 234.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AENT trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs GAIA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while GAIA trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BREA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BREA trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs GNUS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CNVS Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CNVS trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LVO Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 87.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LVO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LVO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RSVRW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RSVRW trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AGAE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AGAE trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs NIPG Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while NIPG trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CIDM Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RDIB Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RDIB trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RDI Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RDI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs TOON Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while TOON trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs ANGHW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs ANGH Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while ANGH trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs ADD Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while ADD trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MMV Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs DLPN Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while DLPN trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CSCW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AENTW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AENTW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CPOP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CPOP trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs KUKE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while KUKE trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs HOFV Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while HOFV trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CSSEP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CSSE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CSSEN Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BZFDW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BZFDW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs BLMZ Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs CSSEL Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs HOFVW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs AESE Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs EMWP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs DISCB Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs VIACP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs HMTV Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs LVOPP Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LGF-A has daily volatility of 6.20 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
LGF-A vs ESGC Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs VIACA Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RDBX Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs RDBXW Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs DISCK Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.
LGF-A vs MSGN Comparison
LGF-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGF-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGF-A is priced at $8.59, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGF-A currently has a P/E ratio of -6.93, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, LGF-A's ROE is +1.87%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGF-A is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGF-A.