Legends Business Group, Inc.
Legends Business Group, Inc. LGBS Peers
See (LGBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGBS | $0.00 | N/A | 140.4K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EXPGF | $50.87 | -0.25% | 46.6B | 40.37 | $1.26 | +1.18% |
| EXPGY | $50.66 | -1.45% | 46.3B | 40.21 | $1.26 | +1.15% |
| SGSOY | $10.36 | -1.17% | 20.1B | 28.77 | $0.36 | +3.02% |
| SGSOF | $99.40 | N/A | 19.3B | 27.38 | $3.63 | +3.04% |
| BVVBY | $67.02 | -1.41% | 15B | 23.43 | $2.86 | +3.06% |
| BVRDF | $30.95 | -2.98% | 13.9B | 21.80 | $1.42 | +3.33% |
| CPBLF | $11.00 | N/A | 5.6B | 32.35 | $0.34 | +1.72% |
| BYCRF | $34.12 | +57.58% | 5.2B | 24.37 | $1.40 | +0.51% |
| DKSHF | $66.87 | N/A | 4.3B | 19.78 | $3.38 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
LGBS vs EXPGF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while EXPGF trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to EXPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs EXPGY Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while EXPGY trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs SGSOY Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while SGSOY trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs SGSOF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while SGSOF trades at $99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to SGSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs BVVBY Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while BVVBY trades at $67.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs BVRDF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while BVRDF trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to BVRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs CPBLF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while CPBLF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs BYCRF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while BYCRF trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs DKSHF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while DKSHF trades at $66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to DKSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs IPSOF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while IPSOF trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs EUBG Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 567.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while EUBG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs BGPBF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs RCDOF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs AYAG Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while AYAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to AYAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs KMNCF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while KMNCF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to KMNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs FLCX Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FLCX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to FLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs MANOF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while MANOF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs GPLS Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while GPLS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs DFCO Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while DFCO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DFCO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs VIZC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs ADHC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs AIMH Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while AIMH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs INTO Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while INTO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to INTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs BLDV Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs MRDH Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 536.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while MRDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to MRDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs AMMJ Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 464.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of +15.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to AMMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs AERS Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 449.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while AERS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to AERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs QPRC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 368.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while QPRC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs SGDH Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 346.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while SGDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs DEQI Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 278.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to DEQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs DCAC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DCAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS and DCAC have similar daily volatility (196.04).
LGBS vs GTVH Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 141.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTVH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs SYNJ Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS and SYNJ have similar daily volatility (196.04).
LGBS vs MSYN Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs CSLI Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to CSLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs ITEC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ITEC's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS and ITEC have similar daily volatility (196.04).
LGBS vs ENCC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 57K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while ENCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs PCHK Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 35.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to PCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs FUGI Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while FUGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FUGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs STWC Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 8.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while STWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS and STWC have similar daily volatility (196.04).
LGBS vs HDST Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to HDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs RPSGF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, RPSGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to RPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs ISAT Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, ISAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while ISAT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to ISAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.
LGBS vs GLSEF Comparison
LGBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGBS stands at 140.4K. In comparison, GLSEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LGBS is priced at $0.00, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGBS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, LGBS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGBS is more volatile compared to GLSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGBS.